哈尼梯田景观水源区土壤水分时空变异性

生态学杂志

哈尼梯田景观水源区土壤水分时空变异性

宗路平¹,角媛梅^1**,李石华²,张贵³,张家元⁴,何礼平¹,邓钰¹,胡志昕^1

（¹云南师范大学旅游与地理科学学院，昆明 650500； ²云南省基础地理信息中心，昆明 650034； ³云南省地质环境监测院，昆明 650031； ^4云南师范大学民生办公室，昆明 650500）

出版日期:2015-06-10 发布日期:2015-06-10

Spatial and temporal variability of soil moisture in water source region of Hani terrace landscape.

ZONG Lu-ping¹, JIAO Yuan-mei^1**, LI Shi-hua², ZHANG Gui³, ZHANG Jia-yuan⁴, HE Li-ping¹, DENG Yu¹, HU Zhi-xin¹

(¹School of Tourism and Geography Science, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China; ^2Yunnan Province Geomatics Centre, Yunnan 650034,
China; ³Institute of Geological Environment of Yunnan Province, Kunming, 650031, China; ⁴Livelihood Office, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China)

Online:2015-06-10 Published:2015-06-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 哈尼梯田景观的稳定维持依赖于上游水源区对水资源的涵养，土壤水分的时空变异性是揭示水源区土壤水源涵养格局的重要指标。通过网格法采集水源区表层（0～20 cm）土样162个（旱季81个，雨季81个），应用经典统计学和地统计学方法分析水源区旱、雨季土壤水分空间变异特征。结果表明：（1）以200 m的间距采样，旱季土壤水分变异系数（Cv）为18.50%，半变异函数结构比值为99.9%，变程为383 m；雨季土壤水分Cv为18.19%，半变异函数结构比值为99.9%，变程475 m。土壤水分均呈中度变异，表现出高度的空间自相关性。从旱季到雨季，土壤水分的空间结构参数存在差异，变程变化最明显；各向异性存在一致性但各向异性比值差异明显。（2）Kriging插值图表明，旱季土壤水分空间格局明显呈斑块分布，斑块破碎度较大，空间连续性较差。雨季呈阶梯状分布，空间连续性强，土壤水分变异的复杂程度变小。旱、雨季土壤水分格局总体变化趋势较一致，但旱季的格局更显著，基本与土地利用格局分布相一致。（3）旱、雨季土壤含水量及其变异受降雨量影响而存在相一致的变化趋势，但旱季土壤水分对降雨量的反应较敏感。（4）土地利用是导致土壤水分空间变异的主要因素，降雨会加强或减弱这种差异的趋势；土壤水分含量受海拔的影响大，受坡度的影响小。（5）土壤水分时空变异能够反映水源涵养格局，对识别水源涵养关键区，保护水源区生态安全格局，维持整个流域水源供给平衡，维持梯田景观的稳定性意义重大。

关键词: 亚精胺, 干旱胁迫, 渗透调节, 细胞膜透性, 玉米幼苗, 光合特性

Abstract:

The water conservation of the water source region in the upper reaches is the key to the sustainability of the landscape of Hani Terraces. The heterogeneity of soil moisture is an important indicator to reveal the pattern of water conservation. Using the grid sampling method, we collected 162 samples (81 in the dry season, 81 in the rainy season) from surface soil (0-20 cm) of the water source region, and analyzed the spatial variability of soil moisture on Hani Terraces based on classical statistics and geostatistics method. The results indicated that: (1) Soil moisture in the dry season is of moderate variation (Cv is 18.19%), the ratio of semivariogram’s structure is 99.9%, and the range is 383 m. Soil moisture in the rainy season is also of moderate variation (Cv is 18.50%), the ratio of semivariogram’s structure is 99.9%, and the range is 475 m, indicating a high spatial autocorrelation of soil moisture. From the dry season to the rainy season, the spatial structure parameters of soil moisture are different, and the most obvious one is the range. There is a consistency of the anisotropy, but the ratio is different. (2) Kriging interpolation figure indicates that soil moisture’s spatial pattern in the dry season shows obvious patches with high fragmentation and poor continuity of space. Soil moisture’s spatial pattern in the rainy season shows stripes with good continuity of space. The overall trends of the soil moisture pattern are consistent in the two seasons, but the spatial pattern of the dry season is more significant and is almost same as the land use pattern. (3) Soil moisture and its variation are consistent regarding their spatial tendencies in the dry and rainy seasons because they are both affected by rainfall, but the response of soil moisture in the dry season is more sensitive to rainfall. (4) Land use types are the key factors affecting the heterogeneity of soil moisture, but meteorological factors (such as rainfall) can reinforce or weaken that trend. Soil moisture is significantly correlated with the elevation, but less affected by the slope gradient. (5) Spatial and temporal variability of soil moisture can reflect the differences of water conservation pattern, being of great significance in identifying the key water conservation region, protecting the ecological security pattern, and maintaining the balance of water supply and the stability of the terrace landscape.

Key words: cell membrane permeability., maize seedling, drought stress, photosynthetic characteristics, spermidine, osmotic adjustment

宗路平1,角媛梅1**,李石华2,张贵3,张家元4,何礼平1,邓钰1,胡志昕1. 哈尼梯田景观水源区土壤水分时空变异性[J]. 生态学杂志.

[1]	孙会, 高丽倩, 许明祥, 郭玥微, 赵允格. 干燥速率对黄土丘陵区林下藓类植物生理特征的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(2): 445-454.
[2]	邢媛, 李凯峰, 周进华, 郭华春, 李俊. 不同马铃薯品种（系）耐旱性综合评价及其指标筛选 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(1): 178-187.
[3]	陈玉, 贾剑波, 颜成正, 胡育文, 任鑫磊, 王一帆, 吴小红. 干旱胁迫下杉木叶片吸水及水分逆向运移特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(9): 2091-2099.
[4]	盛伟, 吴欣池, 李慈云, 马艳艳, 梁浩, 张靖雪, 丁西朋, 刘国道, 李欣勇. 41份木豆萌发期抗旱性综合评价 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(7): 1627-1634.
[5]	赵杏花, 张格, 韩彦隆, 郭璐, 何玉婷, 高永. 唐古特白刺枝叶形态结构对水分条件的响应 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(6): 1290-1298.
[6]	王琦, 许艳丽, 闫鹏, 董好胜, 张薇, 卢霖, 董志强. 聚天门冬氨酸和壳聚糖复配剂对谷子光合特性、氮素利用率及产量的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(3): 643-652.
[7]	偶春, 程雯慧, 王泽璐, 沈钟媛, 姚侠妹. 硅对镉胁迫下香椿幼苗光合特性和离子吸收的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(2): 333-341.
[8]	杨阳, 赵鸿, 唐国瑛, 黄小燕, 王鹤龄. 半干旱区马铃薯叶片光合生理参数的土壤水分阈值效应 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(11): 2622-2629.
[9]	李聪聪, 宋勇, 孙东泉. 不同品种玉米在盐碱复合胁迫下的幼苗生长差异及其生理机制 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(10): 2486-2493.
[10]	肖璐洁, 杨武德, 冯美臣, 孙慧, 王超. 基于高光谱植被指数的冬小麦估产模型 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(7): 1433-1440.
[11]	高歌, 李正才, 葛晓改, 黄润霞, 李爱博. 施氮对干旱胁迫下毛竹幼苗生物量和根系形态的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(5): 858-864.
[12]	余明龙, 黄露, 郑殿峰, 冯乃杰, 牟保民, 刘美玲. 外源调环酸钙对盐碱胁迫下大豆幼苗生长及生理特性的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(4): 683-692.
[13]	李木子, 陈雅昕, 李秋丽, 张倩, 殷有, 朱文旭, 周永斌. 辽西北风沙地区不同无性系桑树抗旱性 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(2): 256-262.
[14]	明立伟, 马婷玉, 肖珊珊, 杨克军, 王玉凤. 芽胞杆菌对盐碱胁迫下玉米幼苗促生作用 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(12): 2352-2360.
[15]	田露, 郭晓霞, 苏文斌, 黄春燕, 李智, 韩康, 菅彩媛, 薛春雷, 潘天遵. 不同改良材料对苏打盐碱化耕地甜菜叶片光合特性、干物质积累和分配的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(12): 2461-2470.