欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同玉米与大豆栽培模式的能值效益分析

徐敏1,宋春1,2*,陈宇亮1,张腾1,徐锋1,赵伟1,杨文钰2*#br#   

  1. (1四川农业大学环境学院生态环境研究所, 成都 611130;  2农业部西南作物生理生态与耕作重点实验室, 成都 611130)
  • 出版日期:2016-10-10 发布日期:2016-10-10

Emergy benefit analysis of different maize and soybean planting patterns.

XU Min1, SONG Chun1,2*, CHEN Yu-liang1, ZHANG Teng1, XU feng1, ZHAO wei1, YANG Wen-yu2*#br#   

  1. (1Institute of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, College of Environment, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China; 2Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Cultivation in Southwest, Ministry of Agriculture, Chengdu 611130, China).
  • Online:2016-10-10 Published:2016-10-10

摘要:

合理的田间配置是农田生态系统可持续发展的前提。本研究采用能值理论与方法,分析2∶2玉米-大豆带状套作(M/S1)、1∶1玉米-大豆传统套作(M/S2)、玉米单作(M)、大豆单作(S)4种栽培模式下系统能值投入产出、环境负载率及可持续发展指数等指标,为优化农田配置提供依据。结果表明:4种栽培模式下能值投入表现为M/S2>M/S1>M>S,工业辅助能以肥料为主,可更新有机能以人工投入为主,能值产出表现为M/S1>M/S2>S>M;与玉米相比,大豆具有能值产出高、能值投入低、环境负载率小、可持续发展程度高等特点;经济效益表现为M/S1、M/S2、M显著高于S;可通过降低化肥投入,特别是磷、钾肥,减少耕作次数或深度,适当提高大豆密度,降低玉米种植密度,降低环境负载率,提高能值可持续发展指数,以优化M/S1栽培模式。
 

关键词: 土壤环境, 微生物群落, 高粱, 轮作, 连作障碍

Abstract: Proper field arrangements are essential for sustainable agricultural ecosystem. Using emergy theory and method, this paper analyzed the differences of emergy input and output, environmental loading rate and emergy sustainability index under four cultivation modes: 2∶2 cornsoybean strip intercropping (M/S1), cornsoybean traditional intercropping 1∶1 (M/S2), maize monoculture (M) and soybean monoculture (S), in order to provide reference for optimized arrangement of farmlands. The results showed that the emergy inputs were in order of M/S2>M/S1>M>S. Fertilizer input accounted for a large proportion of subsidiary industrial emergy, and labor input accounted for a large proportion of renewable organic emergy. The emergy outputs were in order of M/S1>M/S2>S>M. Compared with maize, soybean had higher energy output, lower energy input, lower environmental load rate, higher emergy sustainability index. Economic benefits of M/S1, M/S2 and M were higher than that of mode S. In order to further optimize M/S1, we should reduce fertilizer input, especially phosphorus and potassium fertilizer, reduce the frequency and depth of farming, and increase the density of soybean, reduce density of maize, reduce environmental load rate and improve the emergy sustainability index.

Key words: rotation cropping, sorghum, soil environment, microbial community, continuous cropping obstacle.