欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (8): 2724-2736.

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于DPSIR的湖南省土地生态安全时空变化

王文萱,李明孝*   

  1. (湖南农业大学水利与土木工程学院, 湖南农业大学资源环境学院, 长沙 410128)
  • 出版日期:2020-08-10 发布日期:2021-02-10

Spatiotemporal change of land ecological security in Hunan based on DPSIR.

WANG Wen-xuan, LI Ming-xiao*   

  1. (College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering/College of Resources and Environment, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China).  
  • Online:2020-08-10 Published:2021-02-10

摘要: 根据DPSIR模型从自然、经济、社会、环境和景观格局方面构建指标体系,利用综合权重物元分析模型对湖南省土地生态安全进行评价,并对空间格局变化特征及其影响因素进行分析。结果表明:湖南省2000年土地生态不安全和较不安全等级的地区主要集中在中部和西部,较安全等级地区集中在东北部,2016年向西和向南上升至较安全等级,中北部地区为临界安全等级,空间差异缩小;湖南省土地生态安全总体呈现较不安全到较安全发展趋势,但等级状态不稳定;驱动力、压力、状态和响应系统生态安全等级均有提升,影响系统为临界安全等级且小幅下降,说明承载干扰的能力仍较弱;湖南省土地生态安全因经济密度、农村居民人均收入、人均GDP、城市人均公共绿地面积、农业机械化程度和污水处理率因素水平的提升保障其稳步发展,主要受人口自然增长率、城镇化率,农业面源污染、土地利用景观格局和科技投资比例因素制约。地形和土地利用景观格局因素是形成空间分异的根本原因。

关键词: 土地生态安全, DPSIR, 物元分析, 综合权重, 湖南

Abstract: An index system was constructed based on the “DriversPressureStateImpactResponse” (DPSIR) model, with nature, economy, society, environment, and landscape pattern being considered. The comprehensive weight matterelement analysis model was used to evaluate land ecological security in Hunan and to analyze the characteristics and driving factors of its spatiotemporal change. The results showed that the areas with unsafe and relatively unsafe land ecology were mainly concentrated in center and west of Hunan, while the relatively safe area was in the northeast in 2000. The west and south parts of Hunan were upgraded to the relatively safe level, while the north central parts were in critically safe level in 2016. Therefore, the spatial differences in land ecological security in Hunan were temporally reduced. The land ecological security in Hunan presented a development trend from relatively unsafe to relatively safe, with unstable status. The ecological security levels of driving force, pressure, state and response systems were all improved. The impact system was in critically safe level, which was slightly decreased, indicating a weak capacity of bearing disturbance. The steady development of land ecological security in Hunan was guaranteed by the improvement of economic density, per capita income of rural residents, per capita GDP, per capita public green area of cities, degree of agricultural mechanization and sewage treatment rate, which was mainly restricted by the natural growth rate of population, urbanization rate, non-point source pollution of agriculture, landscape pattern of land use, and rate of scientific and technological investment. Topography and land-use landscape pattern were the fundamental factors accounting for the spatial variations of land ecological security.

Key words: land ecological security, DPSIR, matter-element analysis, comprehensive weight, Hunan.