太白山锐齿栎林物种-多度分布格局

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202105.010

应用生态学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 1717-1725.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202105.010

太白山锐齿栎林物种-多度分布格局

尉文¹, 宋文超^2,3, 郭毅春^2,3, 张厚发^2,3, 闫琰^1*, 张硕新^1,4

¹西北农林科技大学林学院, 陕西杨凌 712100;
²气候适应型城市重点实验室, 陕西商洛 726000;
³商洛市气象局, 陕西商洛 726000;
⁴陕西秦岭森林生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站, 陕西杨凌 712100

收稿日期:2020-10-15 接受日期:2021-02-21 出版日期:2021-05-15 发布日期:2021-11-15
通讯作者: *E-mail: yanyanemail@nwafu.edu.cn
作者简介:尉文,女,1993年生,硕士研究生。主要从事森林生态研究。E-mail:yw2358200052@126.com
基金资助:
商洛市气候适应型城市重点实验室开放研究基金项目(SLSY2019006)、国家自然科学基金项目(31700380)和中央高校基本科研业务费专项(2452016139)资助

Species-abundance distribution patterns of Quercus aliena var. acutiserrata forest in Taibai Mountain, China.

YU Wen¹, SONG Wen-chao^2,3, GUO Yi-chun^2,3, ZHANG Hou-fa^2,3, YAN Yan^1*, ZHANG Shuo-xin^1,4

¹College of Forestry, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi China;
²Key Laboratory of Climate Adaptation City, Shangluo 726000, Shaanxi, China;
³Shangluo Meteorological Bureau, Shangluo 726000, Shaanxi, China;
⁴Qinling National Forest Ecosystem Research Station, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China

Received:2020-10-15 Accepted:2021-02-21 Online:2021-05-15 Published:2021-11-15
Contact: *E-mail: yanyanemail@nwafu.edu.cn
Supported by:
Open Research Found of Key Laboratory of Climate Adaptation City, Shangluo Meteorological Bureau (SLSY2019006), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31700380) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2452016139).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以太白山1.5 hm²的锐齿栎原始林和次生林样地中环境因子和胸径≥1 cm的木本植物调查数据为基础,采用统计模型(对数正态模型)、生态位模型(Zipf模型、断棍模型、生态位优先模型)和中性模型,拟合了锐齿栎群落的物种多度分布。结果表明: 太白山锐齿栎林物种多度分布格局受到生境异质性的影响。其中,地形因子对原始林物种分布影响较大,在凹凸度较大的生境中,物种分布同时受到中性过程和生态位过程的影响,但中性过程发挥的作用较小;而在凹凸度较小的生境中,中性模型被拒绝,物种的多度分布符合生态位理论的假设。在群落坡度大的区域,群落中生态位过程和中性过程同等重要;而在坡度较小的平缓区域,生态位分化对群落物种分布的影响较大。在次生林中,影响物种分布的因素主要是土壤养分。在次生林土壤速效磷含量高的生境中,生态位过程是影响群落物种分布的主要生态学过程;而在土壤速效磷含量低的生境中,中性过程和生态位过程在群落物种分布中同时存在。太白山锐齿栎林物种多度分布格局存在明显的尺度效应。原始林在20 m×20 m尺度上,生态位模型和中性模型都能预测物种多度分布,而在40 m×40 m和70 m×70 m尺度上,生态位过程可解释物种多度分布格局。在次生林样地20 m×20 m、40 m×40 m、70 m×70 m尺度上,生态位过程和中性过程共同作用于物种的分布,但是生态位过程更为重要。可见,除了尺度和生境异质性外,原始林与受干扰的次生林中的物种多度分布也存在明显的差异。

关键词: 锐齿栎林, 物种-多度分布格局, 尺度, 生境异质性

Abstract: The statistical model (log-normal model), niche models (Zipf model, broken stick mo-del, niche preemption model), and neutral model were used to fit the species-abundance distribution patterns based on the measurements of environmental factors and inventory data of trees with DBH≥1 cm in a 1.5 hm² plot in the primary forest (PF) and a 1.5 hm² plot in the secondary forest (SF). The results showed that species-abundance distribution was affected by habitat heterogeneity in Q. aliena var. acutiserrata forest. Topography had a predominant impact on the species-abundance distribution in PF. Species distribution was affected by both neutral and niche processes, with neutral process having a less prominent effect in large convexity habitats. While the neutral model was rejected by the K-S and Chi-square test in low convexity habitats, the species-abundance distribution satisfied the assumption of niche theory. Niche process and neutral process were equally important in the community in areas with steep slopes, while niche differentiation was the dominant in flat areas. In SF, the main factors affecting species distribution were soil nutrients. The niche process was the mainly ecological process affected species-abundance distribution in habitats with high soil available phosphorus, while the niche and neutral processes existed simultaneously in habitats with low soil phosphorus availability. There was a significant scale effect on the species-abundance distribution pattern of Q. aliena var. acutiserrata forests in Taibai Mountain. The niche and neutral processes could protect the species-abundance distribution at the 20 m×20 m scale in PF, while the niche process could explain the species-abundance distribution at the 40 m×40 m and 70 m×70 m scales. The niche and neutral processes combined acted on the species abundance distribution at the 20 m×20 m, 40 m×40 m and 70 m×70 m scales in SF, with niche process being more important than neutral process. Moreover, besides the scale and habitat heterogeneity, the species-abundance distribution patterns of Q. aliena var. acutiserrata forests differed significantly between primary forest and secondary forest under anthropogenic disturbance.

Key words: Quercus aliena var. acutiserrata forest, species-abundance distribution pattern, scale, habitat heterogeneity

尉文, 宋文超, 郭毅春, 张厚发, 闫琰, 张硕新. 太白山锐齿栎林物种-多度分布格局[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(5): 1717-1725.

YU Wen, SONG Wen-chao, GUO Yi-chun, ZHANG Hou-fa, YAN Yan, ZHANG Shuo-xin. Species-abundance distribution patterns of Quercus aliena var. acutiserrata forest in Taibai Mountain, China.[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(5): 1717-1725.

参考文献

[1] 牛克昌, 刘怿宁, 沈泽昊, 等. 群落构建中的中性理论和生态位理论. 生物多样性, 2009, 17(6): 579-593 [Niu K-C, Liu Y-N, Shen Z-H, et al. Community assembly: The relative importance of neutral theory and niche theory. Biodiversity Science, 2009, 17(6): 579-593]
[2] May F, Wiegand T, Lehmann S, et al. Do abundance distributions and species aggregation correctly predict macroecological biodiversity patterns in tropical forests? Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2016, 25: 575-585
[3] Zhang JX, Qiao XJ, Liu YN, et al. Species-abundance distributions of tree species varies along climatic gradients in China's forests. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2015, 9: 1-7
[4] Chuyong GB, Kenfack D, Harms KE, et al. Habitat specificity and diversity of tree species in an African wet tropical forest. Plant Ecology, 2011, 212: 1363-1374
[5] Wang ZG, Ye WH, Cao HL, et al. Species-topography association in a species-rich subtropical forest of China. Basic and Applied Ecology, 2009, 10: 648-655
[6] 温佩颖, 金光泽. 地形对阔叶红松林物种多样性的影响. 生态学报, 2019, 39(3): 945-956 [Wen P-Y, Jin G-Z. Effects of topography on species diversity in a typical mixed broadleaved-Korean pine forest. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(3): 945-956]
[7] John R, Dalling JW, Harms KE, et al. Soil nutrients influence spatial distributions of tropical tree species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007, 104: 864-869
[8] Bohlman SA, Laurance WF, Laurance SG, et al. Importance of soils, topography and geographic distance in structuring central Amazonian tree communities. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2008, 19: 863-874
[9] Liu JJ, Tan YH, Slik JWF. Topography related habitat associations of tree species traits, composition and diversity in a Chinese tropical forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 2014, 330: 75-81
[10] Chang LW, Zeleny D, Li CF, et al. Better environmental data may reverse conclusions about niche- and dispersal-based processes in community assembly. Ecology, 2013, 94: 2145-2151
[11] Güler B, Jentsch A, Apostolova I. How plot shape and spatial arrangement affect plant species richness counts: Implications for sampling design and rarefaction analyses. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2016, 27: 692-703
[12] Cheng JJ, Mi XC, Nadrowski K, et al. Separating the effect of mechanisms shaping species-abundance distributions at multiple scales in a subtropical forest. Oikos, 2012, 121: 236-244
[13] Wu AC, Deng XW, He HL, et al. Responses of species abundance distribution patterns to spatial scaling in subtropical secondary forests. Ecology and Evolution, 2019, 9: 5338-5347
[14] Seidl R, Schelhaas MJ, Rammer W, et al. Increasing forest disturbances in Europe and their impact on carbon storage. Nature Climate Change, 2014, 4: 806-810
[15] 任学敏, 朱雅, 陈兆进, 等. 太白山锐齿槲栎林乔木更新特征及其影响因子. 林业科学, 2019, 55(1): 11-21 [Ren X-M, Zhu Y, Chen Z-J, et al. Regeneration of arbor trees and its contributing factors in an oak forest in Taibai Mountain, China. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(1): 11-21]
[16] 尉文, 闫琰, 刘晓云, 等. 太白山锐齿栎林群落结构特征. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(6): 1923-1932 [Yu W, Yan Y, Liu X-Y, et al. Community structure of Quercus aliena var. acuteserrata forest in the Taibai Mountain, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(6): 1923-1932]
[17] Preston FW. The commonness and rarity of species. Ecology, 1948, 29: 254-283
[18] 彭少麟, 殷祚云, 任海, 等. 物种集合的种-多度关系模型研究进展. 生态学报, 2003, 23(7): 1590-1605 [Peng S-L, Yin Z-Y, Ren H, et al. Advances in research on the species-abundance relationship models in multi-species collection. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2003, 23(7): 1590-1605]
[19] Frontier S. Diversity and structure in aquatic ecosystems. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review. Aberdeen, Scotland, UK: Aberdeen University Press, 1985: 253-312
[20] MacArthur RH. On the relative abundance of bird species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1957, 43: 293-295
[21] Motomura I. On the statistical treatment of communities. Zoological Magazine, 1932, 44: 379-383
[22] Hubbell SP. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, 2001: 375
[23] Etienne RS. A new sampling formula for neutral biodiversity. Ecology Letters, 2005, 8: 253-260
[24] Breugel M, Craven D, Lai HR, et al. Soil nutrients and dispersal limitation shape compositional variation in secondary tropical forests across multiple scales. Journal of Ecology, 2019, 107: 566-581
[25] Mascaro J, Asner GP, Muller-Landau HC, et al. Controls over aboveground forest carbon density on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Biogeosciences, 2011, 8: 1615-1629
[26] Steidinger B. Qualitative differences in tree species distributions along soil chemical gradients give clues to the mechanisms of specialization: Why boron may be the most important soil nutrient at Barro Colorado Island. New Phytologist, 2015, 206: 895-899
[27] 闫琰, 张春雨, 赵秀海. 长白山不同演替阶段针阔混交林群落物种多度分布格局. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(9): 923-934 [Yan Y, Zhang C-Y, Zhao X-H. Species-abundance distribution patterns at different successional stages of conifer and broad-leaved mixed forest communities in Changbai Mountains, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2012, 36(9): 923-934]
[28] Turner WR, Tjørve E. Scale-dependence in species-area relationships. Ecography, 2005, 28: 721-730
[29] Yuan ZQ, Gazol A, Wang XG, et al. Scale specific determinants of tree diversity in an old growth temperate forest in China. Basic and Applied Ecology, 2011, 12: 488-495
[30] Brown C, Burslem DFRP, IIIiana JB, et al. Multispecies coexistence of trees in tropical forests: Spatial signals of topographic niche differentiation increase with environmental heterogeneity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2013, 280: 1-8
[31] Bataineh M, Kenefic L, Weiskittel A, et al. Influence of partial harvesting and site factors on the abundance and composition of natural regeneration in the Acadian Forest of Maine, USA. Forest Ecology and Management, 2013, 306: 96-106
[32] Chisholm RA, Pacala SW. Niche and neutral models predict asymptotically equivalent species abundance distributions in high-diversity ecological communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010, 107: 15821-15825
[33] Hu YH, Sha LQ, Blanchet FG, et al. Dominant species and dispersal limitation regulate tree species distributions in a 20-ha plot in Xishuangbanna, southwest China. Oikos, 2012, 121: 952-960
[34] Letcher SG, Chazdon RL, Andrade ACS, et al. Phylogenetic community structure during succession: Evidence from three Neotropical forest sites. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 2012, 14: 79-87
[35] Fisher CK, Mehta P. The transition between the niche and neutral regimes in ecology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014, 111: 13111-13116
[36] Ulrich W, Soliveres S, Thomas AD, et al. Environmental correlates of species rank-abundance distributions in global dry lands. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 2016, 20: 56-64
[37] Chao A, Hsieh TC, Chazdon RL, et al. Unveiling the species-rank abundance distribution by generalizing the Good-Turing sample coverage theory. Ecology, 2015, 96: 1189-1201

太白山锐齿栎林物种-多度分布格局

Species-abundance distribution patterns of Quercus aliena var. acutiserrata forest in Taibai Mountain, China.

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吴绍雄, 张勇勇, 赵文智, 康文蓉, 田子晗. 基于COSMIC模型的宇宙射线中子反演荒漠-绿洲区土壤水分 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2445-2452.
[2]	肖武, 阮琳琳, 岳文泽, 周妍, 张丽佳, 胡月明. 面向国土空间生态保护修复的多尺度成效评估体系构建 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2566-2574.
[3]	杜箫宇, 吕飞南, 王春雨, 宇振荣. 基于MSPA-Conefor-MCR的县域尺度生态网络构建——以延庆区为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 1073-1082.
[4]	魏萌, 范文义, 张海军, 于颖, 吴国明, 程腾辉. 4-Scale几何光学模型冠层反射率模拟的空间尺度适用性 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(3): 605-613.
[5]	韦昊延, 陆彦玮, 李敏, 华溢, 潘君佐, 张子瑶. 中国西北内陆季风区基于不同时间尺度和回归方法的大气水线比较 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(3): 657-663.
[6]	邓钰栎, 王丹, 许涵. 双尺度下广东韶关市生态系统服务及其权衡/协同关系及社会生态驱动因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 3073-3084.
[7]	韩安霞, 邱婧, 何春梅, 尹秋龙, 贾仕宏, 罗颖, 李晨璐, 郝占庆. 秦岭皇冠优势灌木苦糖果的空间分布格局及种内种间关联 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(8): 2027-2034.
[8]	张永娥, 赵阳, 路伟伟, 余新晓, 张晓明, 王昭艳, 刘冰, 辛艳. CO₂浓度和土壤含水量对植物个体尺度短期水分利用效率的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(6): 1505-1510.
[9]	孙义, 秦彧, 魏天锋, 常丽, 张仁平, 刘志有, 吕燕燕, 宜树华. 草地植物物种多样性测度方法及发展趋势 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(3): 655-663.
[10]	莫帅豪, 郑粉莉, 冯志珍, 易祎. 典型黑土区侵蚀-沉积对土壤微生物数量空间分布的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(3): 685-693.
[11]	黄金夏, 易雪梅, 贾伟涛, 刘莹, 张松林, 李小红, 吴胜军, 马茂华. 三峡库区消落带外来植物入侵与景观基质组成结构的关联性 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(2): 477-488.
[12]	元冰瑜, 高建华, 池源, 扎边, 龚照辉. 1990—2020年江苏省海岸带景观生态状况指数跨尺度时空特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(2): 489-499.
[13]	薛冰, 李宏庆, 黄蓓佳, 王鹤鸣, 赵雪雁, 方恺, 陈成, 陈伟强, 石磊, 勾晓华. 数据驱动的社会-经济-自然复合生态系统研究:尺度、过程及其决策关联 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(12): 3169-3176.
[14]	于贵瑞, 任小丽, 杨萌, 陈智. 宏观生态系统科学整合研究的多学科知识融合及其技术途径 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(9): 3031-3044.
[15]	于贵瑞, 张黎, 何洪林, 杨萌. 大尺度陆地生态系统动态变化与空间变异的过程模型及模拟系统 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(8): 2653-2665.