黄土丘陵沟壑区黄土坡面侵蚀过程及其影响因素

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202108.016

应用生态学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (8): 2886-2894.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202108.016

黄土丘陵沟壑区黄土坡面侵蚀过程及其影响因素

刘冉¹, 余新晓¹, 蔡强国^2,3, 孙莉英², 方海燕^2,3, 贾国栋¹, 和继军^4*

¹北京林业大学水土保持学院/水土保持国家林业和草原局重点试验室, 北京 100083;
²中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,陆地水循环及地表过程重点试验室, 北京 100101;
³中国科学院大学资源环境学院, 北京 100049;
⁴首都师范大学,城市环境过程和数字模拟国家重点试验室培育基地, 北京资源环境与GIS重点试验室, 北京 100048

收稿日期:2021-01-03 接受日期:2021-05-18 出版日期:2021-08-15 发布日期:2022-02-15
通讯作者: *E-mail: hejiun_200018@163.com
作者简介:刘冉, 女, 1997年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事水土保持研究。E-mail: liuran808@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41771314,41977069)资助

Erosion process of loess slope and influencing factors in the loess hilly-gully region, China

LIU Ran¹, YU Xin-xiao¹, CAI Qiang-guo^2,3, SUN Li-ying², FANG Hai-yan^2,3, JIA Guo-dong¹, HE Ji-jun^4*

¹School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University/Key Laboratory of State Forestry and Grassland Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing 100083, China;
²Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Related Land Surface Processes, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
³College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
⁴Cultivation Base of State Key Laboratory of Urban Environmental Processes and Numerical Simulation, Beijing Key Laboratory of Resources Environment and GIS, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China

Received:2021-01-03 Accepted:2021-05-18 Online:2021-08-15 Published:2022-02-15
Contact: *E-mail: hejiun_200018@163.com
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (41771314, 41977069).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 降雨强度、坡长、坡度是影响坡面产流产沙的重要因素。为定量分析降雨强度、坡长、坡度对黄土丘陵沟壑区安塞黄土坡面侵蚀过程的影响,本研究基于室内人工模拟降雨试验,分析2个坡长(5、10 m)、3个坡度(5°、10°、15°)、2个降雨强度(60、90 mm·h^-1)下安塞黄土坡面产流产沙规律。结果表明: 初始产流时间随坡长增加呈减小趋势,但总体变化不大;初始产流时间随降雨强度增加而减小,与60 mm·h^-1相比,90 mm·h^-1下缩短5.7～18 min;10°坡度上的径流起始时间最快。随降雨历时延长,产流率先快速增加,最终逐渐稳定在某一产流率值上下波动;产沙率在产流初期短时间内突然升高,达到最大值后减小,再逐渐达到稳定。产流率和产沙率随坡长和降雨强度的增加而增加,但随坡度变化规律不明显。随着降雨强度、坡长和坡度的增加,总产沙量相应增加。在降雨强度90 mm·h^-1时,坡长和坡度分别为10 m和15°的坡面产生了细沟,导致总侵蚀量最大(11885.66 g)。降雨强度为60 mm·h^-1时,随着坡长增加单位面积侵蚀量减小,在5～10 m坡段存在临界侵蚀坡长。坡长、坡度和降雨强度对坡面径流过程均有促进作用,降雨强度、坡长和两者之间交互作用对产流率和总侵蚀量的贡献率较大,其中,对产流率贡献最大的影响因素是降雨强度,贡献率为49.8%;坡长对总侵蚀的贡献率最大,为37.8%。

关键词: 黄土坡面, 侵蚀过程, 影响因素, 模拟降雨, 贡献率

Abstract: Rainfall intensity, slope length, and slope gradient are the important factors affecting runoff and sediment yield. In order to quantitatively analyze the effects of rainfall intensity, slope length, and slope gradient on the erosion process of Ansai loess slope in loess hilly and gully region, we analyzed the variation of runoff and sediment yield on Ansai loess with two slope lengths (5, 10 m), three slopes (5°, 10°, 15°) and two rainfall intensities (60, 90 mm·h^-1) in an indoor simulated rainfall experiment. The results showed that the initial runoff generation time decreased with the increases of slope length, though the overall change was not significant. The initial runoff generation time decreased with the increases of rainfall intensity. Compared with the intensity of 60 mm·h^-1, the initial runoff generation time decreased by 5.7-18 min under the intensity of 90 mm·h^-1. Among them, the runoff initiation time on the slope of 10° was the fastest. With the duration of rainfall, runoff yield rate increased rapidly at first, and then gradually fluctuated around a certain value. The sediment yield rate increased rapidly in a short period of time at the initial stage of runoff generation, and then decreased after reaching the maximum, and being gradua-lly stable. The rates of runoff and sediment yield increased with the increases of slope length and rainfall intensity, but the law of change with slope was not obvious. With the increases of rainfall intensity, slope length and gradient, the total sediment yield increased accordingly. Under the rainfall intensity of 90 mm·h^-1, the slope surface with the length of 10 m and slope of 15° generated rill, leading to the highest total erosion amount (11885.66 g). Under the rainfall intensity of 60 mm·h^-1, the erosion amount per unit area decreased with the increases of slope length, and there was a critical erosion slope length in 5-10 m slope section. Slope length, slope and rainfall intensity all played a promoting role in runoff process. Rainfall intensity, slope length, and their interaction contributed more to runoff yield rate and total erosion amount. Rainfall intensity contributed the most to runoff yield rate, with a contribution rate of 49.8%. The contribution rate of slope length to the total erosion was the largest, which reached 37.8%.

Key words: loess slope, erosion process, influencing factor, simulated rainfall, contribution rate

刘冉, 余新晓, 蔡强国, 孙莉英, 方海燕, 贾国栋, 和继军. 黄土丘陵沟壑区黄土坡面侵蚀过程及其影响因素[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(8): 2886-2894.

LIU Ran, YU Xin-xiao, CAI Qiang-guo, SUN Li-ying, FANG Hai-yan, JIA Guo-dong, HE Ji-jun. Erosion process of loess slope and influencing factors in the loess hilly-gully region, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(8): 2886-2894.

参考文献

[1] Guo Z, Ma M, Cai C, et al. Combined effects of simulated rainfall and overland flow on sediment and solute transport in hillslope erosion. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2018, 18: 1120-1132
[2] 陈浩, Tsui Y, 蔡强国, 等. 沟道流域坡面与沟谷侵蚀演化关系——以晋西王家沟小流域为例. 地理研究, 2004, 23(3): 329-338 [Chen H, Tsui Y, Cai Q-G, et al. A study of landform morphologic relationships between hillslopes and gullies: Taking small catchment of Wangjiagou in west Shanxi as a case. Geographical Research, 2004, 23(3): 329-338]
[3] 王礼先, 朱金兆, 余新晓, 等. 水土保持学. 第2版. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2005 [Wang L-X, Zhu J-Z, Yu X-X, et al. Soil and Water Conservation. Version 2. Beijing: China Forestry Press, 2005]
[4] 余新晓, 毕华兴. 水土保持学. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2013 [Yu X-X, Bi H-X. Soil and Water Conservation. Beijing: China Forestry Press, 2013]
[5] 甘艺贤, 戴全厚, 伏文兵, 等. 基于模拟降雨试验的喀斯特坡耕地土壤侵蚀特征. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(9): 2754-2760 [Gan Y-X, Dai Q-H, Fu W-B, et al. Characteristics of soil erosion on Karst slopes under artificial rainfall experiment condition. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(9): 2754-2760]
[6] 李子君, 于兴修. 冀北土石山区坡面尺度径流特征及其影响因素. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(17): 109-116 [Li Z-J, Yu X-X. Characteristics of surface runoff and its influencing factors on slope scale in rocky mountain area of northern Hebei Province. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2012, 28(17): 109-116]
[7] Shi ZH, Fang NF, Wu FZ, et al. Soil erosion processes and sediment sorting associated with transport mechanisms on steep slopes. Journal of Hydrology, 2012, 454: 123-130
[8] Asadi H, Ghadiri H, Rose CW, et al. Interrill soil erosion processes and their interaction on low slopes. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2010, 32: 711-724
[9] 黄凯, 刘瑞禄, 覃莉, 等. 不同降雨条件下坡长对喀斯特坡面土壤侵蚀的影响. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(1): 271-280 [Huang K, Liu R-L, Qin L, et al. Effects of slope length on soil erosion of Karst slope under different rainfall conditions. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(1): 271-280]
[10] 李毅, 邵明安. 间歇降雨和多场次降雨条件下黄土坡面土壤水分入渗特性. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(7): 1511-1516 [Li Y, Shao M-A. Infiltration characteristics of soil water on loess slope land under intermittent and repetitive rainfall conditions. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008, 19(7): 1511-1516]
[11] 和继军, 蔡强国, 刘松波. 次降雨条件下坡度对坡面产流产沙的影响. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(5): 1263-1268 [He J-J, Cai Q-G, Liu S-B. Effects of slope gradient on slope runoff and sediment yield under diffe-rent single rainfall conditions. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2012, 23(5): 1263-1268]
[12] Dennis MF, Bryan RB. The relationship of soil loss by interrill erosion to slope gradient. Catena, 2000, 38: 211-222
[13] 方海燕, 蔡强国, 李秋艳. 黄土丘陵沟壑区坡面产流能力及影响因素研究. 地理研究, 2009, 28(3): 583-591 [Fang H-Y, Cai Q-G, Li Q-Y. Study on the runoff generation capacity of slope surface and its influen-cing factors in a hilly loess region on the Loess Plateau. Geographical Research, 2009, 28(3): 583-591]
[14] 吴发启, 赵晓光, 刘秉正. 缓坡耕地降雨、入渗对产流的影响分析. 水土保持研究, 2000, 12(1): 12-17 [Wu F-Q, Zhao X-G, Liu B-Z. Analysis of the effect of rainfall and infiltration on runoff in gently sloping farmland. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2000, 12(1): 12-17]
[15] 朱显谟. 黄土高原水蚀的主要类型及有关因素. 水土保持通报, 1981, 1(3): 1-9 [Zhu X-M. Main types and related factors of water erosion in the Loess Plateau. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 1981, 1(3): 1-9]
[16] 王玲玲, 范东明, 王文龙, 等. 水蚀风蚀交错区不同坡长坡面产流产沙过程. 人民黄河, 2016, 38(3): 72-75 [Wang L-L, Fan D-M, Wang W-L, et al. A field experiment of runoff and sediment yielding processes of different slopes in water and wind erosion crisscross region. Yellow River, 2016, 38(3): 72-75]
[17] 蔡强国. 坡长在坡面侵蚀产沙过程中的作用. 泥沙研究, 1989(4): 84-91 [Cai Q-G. Role of slope length in the process of slope erosion and sediment yield. Journal of Sediment Research, 1989(4): 84-91]
[18] 付兴涛, 张丽萍. 坡长对红壤侵蚀影响人工降雨模拟研究. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2015, 23(3): 474-483 [Fu X-T, Zhang L-P. Impact of slope length on red soil erosion under simulated rainfall. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2015, 23(3): 474-483]
[19] 廖义善, 蔡强国, 程琴娟. 黄土丘陵沟壑区坡面侵蚀产沙地形因子的临界条件. 中国水土保持科学, 2008(2): 35-41 [Liao Y-S, Cai Q-G, Cheng Q-J. Critical topographic condition for slope erosion in hilly-gully region of Loess Plateau. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2008(2): 35-41]
[20] 李玥. 黄土丘陵区退耕与农业生态经济社会系统协同发展研究. 硕士论文. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2019 [Li Y. Study on the Coupling Development of Grain for Green and Agricultural Eco-economic System in Loess Hilly Region: Ansai County. Master Thesis. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2019]
[21] 和继军, 王硕, 蔡强国, 等. 黄土缓坡片蚀过程及其水力参数适宜性试验研究. 水科学进展, 2021, 32(1): 97-108 [He J-J, Wang S, Cai Q-G, et al. Experimental study on sheet erosion process of loess and its suitability of hydraulic parameters on gentle slopes. Advances in Water Science, 2021, 32(1): 97-108]
[22] 雷廷武, 张晴雯, 赵军, 等. 细沟侵蚀动力过程输沙能力试验研究. 土壤学报, 2002, 39(4): 476-482 [Lei T-W, Zhang Q-W, Zhao J, et al. Laboratory study on sediment transport capacity in the dynamic process of rill erosion. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2002, 39(4): 476-482]
[23] 彭珂珊. 黄土高原水土流失区退耕还林(草)的基本思路. 水利水电科技进展, 2000, 20(3): 9-14 [Peng K-S. Thinking for returning the grain plots to forest and grass lands in soil and water loess areas on Loess Plateau. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 2000, 20(3): 9-14]
[24] 周佩华, 王占礼. 黄土高原土壤侵蚀暴雨标准. 水土保持通报, 1987, 7(1): 38-44 [Zhou P-H, Wang Z-L. Soil erosion storm rainfall standard in the Loess Pla-teau. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 1987, 7(1): 38-44]
[25] 国务院. 水土保持工作条例. 北京: 国务院, 1982 [The State Council. Regulations on Soil and Water Conservation Work. Beijing: The State Council, 1982]
[26] 曹晓娟, 谢林妤, 张风宝, 等. 沙层特性对沙盖黄土坡面产流产沙变化贡献的定量分析. 地理学报, 2019, 74(5): 128-140 [Cao X-J, Xie L-S, Zhang F-B, et al. Quantifying the contributions of sand layer characteristic to variations of runoff and sediment yields from sand-covered loess slopes during simulated rainfall. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(5): 128-140]
[27] 郑粉莉, 唐克丽, 周佩华. 坡耕地细沟侵蚀影响因素的研究. 土壤学报, 1989, 26(2): 109-116 [Zheng F-L, Tang K-L, Zhou P-H. Study on factors affecting rill erosion on cultivated slope land. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 1989, 26(2): 109-116]
[28] 孔亚平, 张科利, 唐克丽. 坡长对侵蚀产沙过程影响的模拟研究. 水土保持学报, 2001, 15(2): 17-20 [Kong Y-P, Zhang K-L, Tang K-L. Impacts of slope length on soil erosion process under simulated rainfall. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2001, 15 (2): 17-20]
[29] 李裕元, 邵明安. 降雨条件下坡地水分转化特征实验研究. 水利学报, 2004(4): 48-53 [Li Y-Y, Shao M-A. Experimental study on characteristics of water transformation on slope land. Journal of Hydraulic Enginee-ring, 2004(4): 48-53]
[30] 张会茹, 郑粉莉. 不同降雨强度下地面坡度对红壤坡面土壤侵蚀过程的影响. 水土保持学报, 2011, 25(3): 40-43 [Zhang H-R, Zheng F-L. Effect of slope gradients on erosion from a red soil hillslope under different rainfall intensity. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011, 25(3): 40-43]
[31] 霍云梅, 毕华兴, 朱永杰, 等. 模拟降雨条件下南方典型粘土坡面土壤侵蚀过程及其影响因素. 水土保持学报, 2015, 29(4): 23-26 [Huo Y-M, Bi H-X, Zhu Y-J, et al. Erosion process and its affecting factors of southern typical clay slope under simulated rainfall condition. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015, 29(4): 23-26]
[32] 付兴涛, 张丽萍. 红壤丘陵区坡长对作物覆盖坡耕地土壤侵蚀的影响. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(5): 91-98 [Fu X-T, Zhang L-P. Impact of slope length on soil erosion of sloping farmland with crop in red soil hilly region. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2014, 30(5): 91-98]
[33] Wang L, Shi ZH. Size selectivity of eroded sediment associated with soil texture on steep slopes. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2015, 79: 917-929
[34] Quan X, He JJ, Cai QG, et al. Soil erosion and deposition characteristics of slope surfaces for two loess soils using indoor simulated rainfall experiment. Soil and Tillage Research, 2020, 204: 104714
[35] Romkens MJM, Helming K, Prasad SN. Soil erosion under different rainfall intensities surface roughness and soil water regimes. Catena, 2001, 46: 103-123
[36] 脱登峰, 许明祥, 郑世清, 等. 黄土高原风蚀水蚀交错区侵蚀产沙过程及机理. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(12): 3281-3287 [Tuo D-F, Xu M-X, Zheng S-Q, et al. Sediment-yielding process and its mechanisms of slope erosion in wind-water erosion crisscross region of Loess Plateau, Northwest China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2012, 23(12): 3281-3287]
[37] 盛贺伟, 郑粉莉, 蔡强国, 等. 降雨强度和坡度对粘黄土坡面片蚀的影响. 水土保持学报, 2016, 30(6):13-17 [Sheng H-W, Zheng F-L, Cai Q-G, et al. Effects of rainfall intensity and slope gradient on sheet erosion at the clay loess. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016, 30(6): 13-17]
[38] 陈晓安, 蔡强国, 张利超, 等. 黄土丘陵沟壑区不同雨强下坡长对坡面土壤侵蚀的影响. 土壤通报, 2011, 42(3): 721-725 [Chen X-A, Cai Q-G, Zhang L-C, et al. Impact of slope length on soil erosion under different rainfall intensity in a hilly loess region on the Loess Plateau. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2011, 42(3): 721-725]
[39] 罗来兴. 甘肃华亭粮食沟坡侵蚀量的野外观测及其初步分析结果. 地理学资料, 1958(2): 111-118 [Luo L-X. Field observation and preliminary analysis results of grain gully slope erosion in Huating, Gansu. Geographical Information, 1958(2): 111-118]
[40] 汪晓勇, 郑粉莉. 黄土坡面坡长对侵蚀-搬运过程的影响研究. 水土保持通报, 2008, 28(3): 1-4 [Wang X-Y, Zheng F-L. Effects of slope length on detachment and transport processes on a loessial hillslope. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2008, 28(3): 1-4]
[41] 杨帆. 北京山区坡面土壤颗粒分离和输移过程研究. 博士论文. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2016 [Yang F. Research on Particles Detachment and Transport Processes of the Slope in Beijing Mountainous Area. PhD Thesis. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2016]
[42] 李君兰, 蔡强国, 孙莉英, 等. 降雨强度、坡度及坡长对细沟侵蚀的交互效应分析. 中国水土保持科学, 2011, 9(6): 8-13 [Li J-L, Cai Q-G, Sun L-Y, et al. Analysis of interaction effects of rainfall intensity, slope degree and slope length on rill erosion. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011, 9(6): 8-13]

黄土丘陵沟壑区黄土坡面侵蚀过程及其影响因素

Erosion process of loess slope and influencing factors in the loess hilly-gully region, China

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张岁梦, 叶丽敏, 周肄智, 王晓霞, 许元科, 姜姜, 刘自强. 南方丘陵区马尾松-麻栎群落水分利用来源及其影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1729-1736.
[2]	邵明勤, 王剑颖, 丁红秀. 中国白鹤越冬适宜生境模拟及种群扩张驱动因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1639-1648.
[3]	曹尤淞, 张晨晖, 肖波, 孙福海. 黑土区农田藻藓两类结皮发育对土壤团聚体稳定性和击溅侵蚀的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 892-902.
[4]	张自正, 张蕾, 孙桂英, 刘俊祥. 清江流域生态系统服务权衡时空效应及驱动因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 1051-1062.
[5]	赵梓琨, 田园盛, 翁学先, 李欢玮, 孙文义. 1986—2021年黄河流域地表水体面积的时空变化特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(3): 761-769.
[6]	石铁矛, 王迪, 汤煜, 李沛颖, 初亚奇. 城市生态系统碳汇固碳能力计算方法与影响因素研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(2): 555-565.
[7]	管凝, 程金花, 侯芳, 曾合州, 沈子雅, 赵梦圆, 秦建淼. 西南喀斯特地区典型林分土壤优先流特征及影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 31-38.
[8]	张文龙, 张守红, 张建军. 生物滞留系统径流与水质调控效应研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 264-276.
[9]	李俊, 盛菲, 刘士余, 张婷, 余敏琪. 赣南九曲水流域基流变化特征及其对降水的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(8): 2251-2259.
[10]	江熳, 卜崇峰, 郭琦, 鞠孟辰, 庞景文, 莫秋霞, 王鹤鸣. 不同降水条件下生物结皮覆盖对沙地土壤有机碳的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1764-1772.
[11]	淡晨希, 张琼, 刘畅, 郭珍, 刘刚. 生物结皮与草本植物共生坡面的产流-入渗过程特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1853-1860.
[12]	毛立, 孙志高, 陈冰冰, 胡星云, 武慧慧. 湿地土壤硫氧化-还原过程及其与其他元素的耦合作用研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(2): 560-568.
[13]	王明慧, 黄来明, 陈翠柏. 西藏高寒区不同土地利用方式下土壤持水能力差异及其影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(12): 3287-3293.
[14]	张雅琪, 陈林, 庞丹波, 何文强, 李学斌, 吴梦瑶, 曹萌豪. 土壤微生物群落对枯落物输入的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(11): 2943-2953.
[15]	李瑞栋, 王文龙, 娄义宝, 白芸, 康宏亮, 崔志强, 卢正军. 模拟降雨条件下砾石含量对塿土工程堆积体坡面产流产沙的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(11): 3027-3036.