欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (01): 41-47.

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

水分胁迫下不同基因型小麦苗期的形态生理差异

田梦雨1.2;李丹丹1,2;戴廷波1,2**;姜东1,2;荆奇1,2;曹卫星1,2   

  1. 1南京农业大学农业部南方作物生理生态重点开放实验室,南京 210095;2江苏省信息农业高技术研究重点实验室,南京 210095
  • 出版日期:2010-01-20 发布日期:2010-01-20

Morphological and physiological differences of wheat genotypes at seedling stage under water stress.

TIAN Meng-yu1.2;LI Dan-dan1.2;DAI Ting-bo1.2;JIANG Dong1.2;JING Qi1,2;CAO Wei-xing1.2   

  1. 1Ministry of Agriculture Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology in Southern China|Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095,China|2Jiangsu Province Hi Tech Key Laboratory of Information Agriculture|Nanjing 210095, China
  • Online:2010-01-20 Published:2010-01-20

摘要: 以36个不同育成年代和生态区域的小麦品种为材料,研究了水分胁迫对小麦苗期生长的影响,并基于灰色关联分析评价了小麦品种苗期抗旱性的基因型差异.结果表明:小麦品种抗旱性差异显著,加权抗旱指数在0.2434~0.6580之间;17个形态生理性状中与抗旱性关联程度最大的是地上部干物质量(0.9473),最小的是叶绿素含量(0.5356).采用聚类分析将36个小麦品种分为3类,其中抗旱型8个、中间型23个、敏感型5个.3类基因型的地上部干物质量、根干物质量、植株干物质量、株高、根系氮积累量、叶面积和单株分蘖数差异显著,可作为小麦品种苗期抗旱性鉴定的直接指标.

关键词: 小麦, 苗期, 抗旱性, 基因型差异, 长时间尺度, 土地利用格局, 景观指数, 额济纳三角洲

Abstract: Taking thirty six wheat cultivars bred in different era and ecological regions as test materials, their seedlings growth under water stress was investigated, and their drought resistance was evaluated by gray correlation grade analysis. Significant difference was observed in the drought resistance among the cultivars. The weighted drought resistance index ranged from 0.6580 to 0.2434. Among the test seventeen morphological and physiological traits, shoot dry mass had the greatest correlation degree (0.9473) with drought resistance, while SPAD had the smallest one (0.5356). The test cultivars were clustered into three groups, among which, eight cultivars belonged to strong drought resistance group, twenty three cultivars belonged to medium drought resistance group, and five cultivars belonged to drought-sensitive group. The shoot dry mass, root dry mass, plant dry mass, plant height, root nitrogen accumulation, leaf area, and tiller number per plant differed significantly among the three groups, which could be used for evaluating the drought resistance of wheat cultivars at seedling stage.

Key words: wheat, seedling, drought resistance, genotype variation, long-scale, land use pattern, landscape index, Ejin Delta.