陆地碳循环研究中的模型方法

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 陆地碳循环是全球变化研究中的重要内容,碳循环模型已成为研究陆地碳循环的必要方法。其中气候变化、大气CO₂浓度上升以及人类活动引起的土地利用和土地覆盖变化导致陆地生态系统在结构、功能、组成和分布等方面的变化及其反馈关系对陆地碳循环的影响是模型模拟的关键问题。生物地理模型和生物地球化学模型是碳循环模型的两大类型,建模方法、模型性质、特点和应用范围各异。碳循环模型的发展方向是综合两类模型的特点,建立全球动态碳循环模型。

关键词: 陆地生态系统, 碳循环, 模型

Abstract: Terrestrial carbon cycling is one of the important components in the research of global change, and simulation modeling is a necessary method in understanding the carbon cycling in terrestrial ecosystem.The key processes in the modeling of carbon cycling include the response and feedback of the structure, function, composition and distribution of terrestrial ecosystem to climate change, elevated CO₂ concentration and human induced land use/cover change.Biogeographical and biogeochemical model are the two kinds of models in modeling carbon cycling, which differentiate in the way of model establishment, character and domain of model application.The developmental direction of carbon cycling modeling is to combine the elements of both kinds of models toward the formulation of global dynamic model of carbon cycling.

Key words: Terrestrial ecosystem, Carbon cycling, Model

汪业勖, 赵士洞. 陆地碳循环研究中的模型方法[J]. 应用生态学报, 1998, 9(6): 658-664.

Wang Yexu, Zhao Shidong . Modelings of terrestrial carbon cycling[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 1998, 9(6): 658-664.

参考文献

1 延晓冬、赵士洞. 1995. 温带针阔混交林林分碳贮量动态的模拟模型. 生态学杂志, 14(2):6～12.

2 陈泮勤等编. 1994. 国际全球变化研究核心计划(二). 北京:气象出版社. 90～130.

3 周广胜、张新时. 1995. 自然植被净第一性生产力模型初探. 植物生态学报, 17:1～8.

4 周广胜、张新时. 1996. 全球变化的中国气候2植被分类研究. 植物学报, 38(1):8～17.

5 盛永伟、陈维英等. 1995. 利用气象卫星植被指数进行我国植被的宏观分类. 科学通报, 40(1):68～71.

6 Amt hor J. S. and Loomis, R. S. 1996. Integrating knowledge of crop responses to elevated CO₂ and temperature wit h mechanistic simulation models:model components and research needs. In:Carbon Dioxide and Terrestrial Ecosyst ms. San Diego:Academic Press, pp. 443.

7 Bolin, B. , Degens, E. T. et al. 1979. The global biogeochemical carbon cycle. In:The Global Carbon Cycle, SCOPE 13. Chichester:John Wiley&Sons, 1～56.

8 Box, E. O. 1995. Factors determining distributions of tree species and plant functional types. V egetatio, 121:101～116.

9 Dahlman, R. C. 1985. Modeling needs for predicting responses to CO₂ enrichment:plants, communities and ecosystems. Ecological Modelli ng, 29:77～106.

10 Emanuel, W. R. , Killough, G. G. , Post, W. M. et al. 1984. Modeling terrestrial ecosystems in t he global carbon cycle wit h shifts in carbon storage capacity by land use change. Ecology, 65(3):970～983.

11 Esser, G. 1987. Sensitivity of global carbon pools and fluxes to human and potential climatic impacts. Tell us, 39B:245～260.

12 Esser, G. 1995. Contribution of monsoon Asia to t he carbon budget of t he biosphere, past and future. V egetatio, 121:175～188.

13 Gifford, R. M. 1993. Implications of CO₂ effects on vegetation for t he global carbon budget. In:The Global Carbon Cycle. NA TO ASI Series, Vol. I 15. Heidelberg:Springer Verlag, 159～199.

14 Goldewijk, K. K. , Leemans, R. 1995. System models of terrestrial carbon cycling. In:Carbon Sequestration in t he Biosphere. NA TO ASI Series, Vol. I33. Heidelberg:Springer Verlag, 129～151.

15 Houghton, R. A. , Hobbie, J. E. and Melillo, J. M. 1983. Changes in t he carbon content of terrestrial biota and soils between 1860 and 1980:A net release of CO₂ to t he at mosphere. Ecological Monographs, 53(3):235～262.

16 Hudson, R. J. M. , Gherini, S. A. , Goldstein, R. A. 1994. Modeling t he global carbon cycle:Nitrogen fertilization of t he terrestrial biosphere and t he”missing”CO₂ sink. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 8(3):307～333.

17 Iverson, L. R. , Brown, S. , Prasad, A. et al. 1994. Use of GIS for estimating potential and actual forest biomass for continental sout h and sout heast Asia. In:Effects of Land use Change on Atmospheric CO₂ Concentration:Sout h and Sout heast Asia as a Case Study. New York:Springer Verlag, 67～116.

18 Kohlmaier, G. H. et al. 1987. Modelling stimulation of plants and ecosystem response to present levels of excess at mospheric CO₂. Tell us, 39B:155～170.

19 Leemans, R. 1997. Effects of global change on agricultural land use:scaling up from physiological processes to ecosystem dynamics. In:Ecology in Agriculture. San Diego:Academic Press, 415～452.

20 Leemans, R. and Zuidema, G. 1995. Evaluating changes in land cover and t heir importance for global change. T ree, 10(2):76～81.

21 Luo, Yiqi and Mooney, H. A. 1996. Stimulation of global photosynt hetic carbon influx by an increase in at mospheric carbon dioxide concentration. In Carbon Dioxide and Terrestrial Ecosystem. San Diego:Academic Press, 381～397.

22 Moore, B. , Boone, R. D. , Hobbie, J. E. et al. 1981. A simple model for analysis of t he role of terrestrial ecosystems in t he global carbon budget. In:Carbon Cycle Modelling. Bert Bolin(ed. ). Chichester:John Wiley&Sons, 365～385.

23 Parton, W. J. et al. 1993. Observations and modeling of biomass and soil organic matter dynamics for t he grassland biome worldwide. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 7(4):785～809.

24 Post, W. M. , Emanuel, W. R. , Zinke, P. J. et al. 1982. Soil carbon pools and world life zones. N at ure, 298:156～159.

25 Post, W. M. , Peng, T2H. et al. 1990. The global carbon cycle. A merican Scientist, 78:310～326.

26 Potter, C. S. and Klooster, S. A. 1997. Global model estimates of carbon and nitrogen storage in litter and soil pools:response to changes in vegetation quality and biomass allocation. Tell us, 49B:1～17.

27 Prentice, I. C. 1993. A simulation model for t he transient effects of climate change on forest landscapes. Ecological Modelli ng, 65:51～70.

28 Prentice, I. C. 1993. Biome modelling and t he carbon cycle. In:The Global Carbon Cycle. NA TO ASI Series, Vol. I 15. Heidelberg:Springer Verlag, 219～238.

29 Reynolds, J. F. , Kemp, P. R. et al. 1996. Progress, limitation and challenges in modeling t he effects of elevated CO₂ on plants and ecosystems. In:Carbon Dioxide and Terrestrial Ecosystem. San Diego:Academic Press, 347～381.

30 Rot mans, J. and Den Elzen, M. G. J. 1993. Modelling feedback mechanisms in t he carbon cycle:balancing t he carbon budget. Tell us, 45B:301～320.

31 Running, S. W. 1993. Modeling terrestrial carbon cycles at varying temporal and spatial resolutions. In:The Global Carbon Cycle. NA TO ASI Series, Vol. I15. Heidelberg:Springer Verlag, 201～217.

32 Shugart, H. H. and Smit h, T. M. 1996. A review of forest patch models and t heir application to global change research. Cli m atic Change, 34:131～153.

33 Smit h, T. M. , Cramaer, W. P. et al. 1993. The global terrestrial carbon cycle. W ater, A i r, and Soil Poll ution, 70:19～37.

34 Sykes, M. T. and Prentice, I. C. 1995. Carbon storage and climate change in Swedish forest:a comparison of static and dynamic modelling approachs. In:Forest Ecosystems, Forest Management and t he Global Carbon Cycle. NA TO ASI Series. Vol. I40. Heidelberg:Springer Verlag, 69～78.

35 Townsend, A. R. and Rastetter, E. B. 1993. Nutrient constraints on carbon storage in forested ecosystems. In:Forest Ecosystem, Forest Management and t he Global Carbon Cycle. NA TO ASI Series. Vol. I40. Heidelberg:Springer Verlag, 35～45.

36 V EMAP Members. 1995. Vegetation/ecosystem modeling and analysis project:Comparing biogeography and biogeochemistry models in a continentalscale study of terrestrial ecosystem responses to climate change and CO₂ doubling. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, (4):407～437.

37 Walker, B. H. 1994. Landscape to regional scale responses of terrestrial ecosystems to global change. A MB IO, 23(1):67～73.

38 Walker, B. and Steffen, W. 1997. IGBP Science No. 1:A synt hesis of GCTE and related research. Stockholm:I GBP, 1～24.

39 Waring, R. H. and Running, S. W. 1998. Forest Ecosystem, Analysis at Multiple Scales. 2nd edition. San Diego:Academic Press:286～320.

40 Warnat, P. , Francois, L. et al. 1994. CARAIB:A global model of terrestrial biological productivity. Global Biogeochemical Cycle, 8(3):255～270.

41 Woodward, F. I. , Smit h, T. M. and Emanuel, W. R. 1995. A global land primary productivity and phytogeography model. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 9(4):471～490.

[1]	肖晨, 田栋元, 马榕, 董灵波. 兴安落叶松天然林更新数量相容性预测模型 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2345-2354.
[2]	杨振康, 杨婉蓉, 刘志娟, 高伟达, 任图生, 沈彦俊, 杨晓光. 气候变化对东北三省土壤风蚀的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2429-2435.
[3]	孙龙, 马灵感, 郭妍, 范佳乐, 陈伯轩, 胡同欣. 基于卷积神经网络及气象要素回归法的地表死可燃物含水率预测模型 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2453-2461.
[4]	谢卓洪, 雷敏, 刘利杰, 莫燕卿, 战国强, 刘萍. 珠三角城市群景观生态格局评价与优化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2481-2488.
[5]	祁育汀, 张平, 刘雷, 马雪楠, 王欢, 赵娟. 关中平原城市群土地利用结构多情景优化和生态系统服务价值预测 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2507-2517.
[6]	任孟林, 郭妍, 陈伯轩, 范佳乐, 胡同欣, 孙龙. 红松人工林地表可燃物火蔓延速率预测模型 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(8): 2091-2100.
[7]	邢衍阔, 康斌, 鹿志创, 高祥刚, 王震, 田甲申. 气候变化条件下太平洋丽龟的适宜生境及其变化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(8): 2267-2273.
[8]	贾肖肖, 肖辉杰, 辛智鸣, 范光鹏, 李俊然, 杨玉丽, 汪立韬. 农田防护林不同树种三维模型构建与风场模拟 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1892-1900.
[9]	陈红莲, 李瑞, 张玉珊, 吴清林, 袁江, 高家勇. 赤水河流域不同地貌区生态系统健康对比 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1912-1922.
[10]	王复标, 杨小龙, 康华靖, 叶子飘. 不同环境条件下光合作用对光响应模型的研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1995-2005.
[11]	夏卓异, 苏杰, 尹海伟, 孔繁花. 气候变化背景下中国朱鹮适宜生境时空格局 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1467-1473.
[12]	李久林, 胡大卫, 储金龙, 尹海伟. 基于未来情景模拟的安徽省潜山市生态网络构建与优化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1474-1482.
[13]	郭蓉, 吴旭东, 王占军, 蒋齐, 俞鸿千, 贺婧, 刘文娟, 马琨. 荒漠草原土壤细菌和真菌群落对降水变化的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1500-1508.
[14]	蓝浩宸, 刘琰琰, 张玉芳, 康杨. 基于标准化降水蒸散指数的川西高原干旱时空变化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1533-1540.
[15]	徐彩瑶, 任燕, 孔凡斌. 浙江省土地利用变化对生态系统固碳服务的影响及其预测 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1610-1620.