宁夏贺兰山东麓葡萄产业生态系统服务功能价值评估

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.201903.028

应用生态学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 979-985.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201903.028

宁夏贺兰山东麓葡萄产业生态系统服务功能价值评估

宋振威^1,2, 孙美莹^1,2, 杨荣金^2*, 窦广玉², 张一^1,2, 张乐²

¹北京师范大学全球变化与地球系统科学研究院, 北京 100875;
²中国环境科学研究院, 北京 100012

收稿日期:2018-07-04 出版日期:2019-03-20 发布日期:2019-03-20
通讯作者: E-mail: yangrj@craes.org.cn
作者简介:宋振威,女,1993年生,硕士研究生. 主要从事区域资源开发与生态安全维持研究. E-mail: szwzsx@126.com
基金资助:
本文由宁夏贺兰山东麓葡萄产业生态文明试验区创建规划服务项目(2017-横向-418)资助

Evaluation of ecosystem service value of the grape industry at the eastern foot of Helan Mountain, Ningxia, China

SONG Zhen-wei^1,2, SUN Mei-ying^1,2, YANG Rong-jin^2*, DOU Guang-yu², ZHANG Yi^1,2, ZHANG Le²

¹College of Global Change and System Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
²Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China

Received:2018-07-04 Online:2019-03-20 Published:2019-03-20
Supported by:
This work was supported by the Service Item of the Ecological Civilization Experimental Zone Creation Planning of the Grape Industry at the Eastern Foot of Helan Mountain, Ningxia (2017-Horizontal project-418).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 利用宁夏回族自治区统计局、宁夏回族自治区葡萄产业发展局和国家统计局等的相关统计数据,从食品生产、固碳释氧、净化大气、土壤保持、涵养水源、节水增效、生态旅游和生态扶贫等角度,对宁夏贺兰山东麓葡萄产业生态系统服务价值进行评估.结果表明: 1)宁夏贺兰山东麓葡萄产业生态系统服务功能价值为35.98亿元,其中直接效益为22亿元,生态效益为13.98亿元.生态效益占整个产业生态系统服务价值的38.85%.2)生态效益中,各项功能的价值量依次为: 生态扶贫>生态旅游>固碳释氧>节水增效>净化大气>土壤保持>涵养水源.3)生态效益中,生态扶贫的价值最高,占64.39%;生态旅游的价值次之,占24.47%.对葡萄产业进行生态系统服务功能价值评估,既可以让人们在看到葡萄产业直接效益的同时,又可以意识到葡萄产业所带来的生态效益.这对全面指导葡萄产业健康持续发展具有重要参考价值.

关键词: 贺兰山东麓, 生态系统, 葡萄产业, 服务价值, 价值评估

Abstract: Using statistical data from Statistics Bureau of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, the Grape Industry Development Bureau of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, and National Bureau of Statistics, ecosystem service value of grape industry at the eastern foot of Helan Mountain in Ningxia was evaluated from eight facets, i.e., food production, carbon fixation and oxygen release, air purification, soil conservation, water-holding, water conservation and efficiency, eco-tourism, and ecological poverty alleviation. The results showed that: 1) ecosystem service value of the grape industry was 3.6 billion (RMB), with direct benefit of 2.2 billion and the ecological benefit of 1.4 billion. Ecological benefit accounted for 38.85% of the total ecosystem service value. 2) The service value of the grape industry was in the order of ecological poverty alleviation> eco-tourism> carbon fixation and oxygen release> water conservation and efficiency > air purification > soil conservation> water-holding. 3) Among the ecological benefits, the value of ecological poverty alleviation was the highe-st, accounting for 64.39%; the value of ecotourism was the second, accounting for 24.47%. The results indicated the necessity of assessing ecosystem service value of the grape industry, which could enable people to realize the direct economic benefits as well as the ecological benefits. This study had important reference value for comprehensively guiding the healthy and sustainable deve-lopment of the grape industry.

Key words: ecosystem, value eva-luation, service value, eastern foot of Helan Mountain, grape industry

宋振威, 孙美莹, 杨荣金, 窦广玉, 张一, 张乐. 宁夏贺兰山东麓葡萄产业生态系统服务功能价值评估[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(3): 979-985.

SONG Zhen-wei, SUN Mei-ying, YANG Rong-jin, DOU Guang-yu, ZHANG Yi, ZHANG Le. Evaluation of ecosystem service value of the grape industry at the eastern foot of Helan Mountain, Ningxia, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(3): 979-985.

参考文献

[1] Yan S-Y (阎水玉), Wang X-R (王祥荣). Progress in ecosystem services research. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 2002, 21(5): 61-68 (in Chinese)
[2] Wang Y-K (汪有奎), Guo S-X (郭生祥), Wang J (汪杰), et al. Evaluation of forest ecosystem service value in Qilian Mountain National Nature Reserve in Gansu Province. Journal of Desert Research (中国沙漠), 2013, 33(6): 1905-1911 (in Chinese)
[3] Ma G-J (马国军), Lin D (林栋). Evaluation of economic value of ecosystem service function in Shiyang River Basin. Journal of Desert Research (中国沙漠), 2009, 29(6): 1173-1177 (in Chinese)
[4] Wang B (王兵), Lu S-W (鲁绍伟). Evaluation of economic forest ecosystem service value in China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2009, 20(2): 417-425 (in Chinese)
[5] Wu N (吴楠), Chen H-F (陈红枫), Ge J (葛菁). Accounting of ecosystem productivity in Anhui Province under the framework of green GDP2.0. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University (安徽农业大学学报), 2018, 27(1): 39-49 (in Chinese)
[6] Zhang W-Y (张伟燕), Shi Q-D (师庆东), Zhang Y-T (张毓涛), et al. Valuation of ecological service functions of characteristic forest fruits in Southern Xinjiang. Journal of Arid Land Research (干旱区研究), 2017, 34(1): 215-222 (in Chinese)
[7] Zhang Y-G (张永国). Analysis of suitability of grape economic forest in Liugou valley in the third district of Huangqiu. Soil and Water Conservation of China (中国水土保持), 2013(8): 40-42 (in Chinese)
[8] Ma Y-M (马永明). Research on the Development Strate-gy of Grape Industry in Ningxia Nongken. Master Thesis. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2011 (in Chinese)
[9] Na H (纳慧). Coupling of characteristic industry, culture and tourism: A case study of western region wine industry. Commercial Economics Research (商业经济研究), 2016(19): 203-205 (in Chinese)
[10] Du J (杜军), Shen R-Z (沈润泽), Ma S-M (马术梅), et al. Study on the integration technology of drip irrigation and fertilizer for irrigation at the eastern foot of Helan Mountain in Ningxia. China Rural Water and Hydropower (中国农村水利水电), 2013(8): 65-69, 72 (in Chinese)
[11] Sha Y-X (沙月霞), Wang G-Z (王国珍), Fan Z-Q (樊仲庆), et al. Identification of resistance to downy mildew in different grape varieties at the eastern foot of Helan Mountain of Ningxia. Journal of Fruit Science (果树学报), 2007, 24(6): 803-809 (in Chinese)
[12] Li Y-D (李玉鼎), Zhang J-X (张军翔), Zhang G-D (张光弟), et al. Diagnosis and analysis of soil nutrients in wine grape bases at the eastern foot of Helan Mountain of Ningxia. Chinese and Foreign Grape & Wine (中外葡萄与葡萄酒), 2004(3): 17-21 (in Chinese)
[13] Li Q-Y (李秋燕), He X-X (何雪煊). Resources advantages and development strategies for grape industry at the eastern foot of Helan Mountain in Ningxia. Ning-xia Agriculture and Forestry Technology (宁夏农林科技), 2009(3): 80-81 (in Chinese)
[14] Xiao Q (肖强), Xiao Y (肖洋), Ouyang Z-Y (欧阳志云), et al. Valuation of forest ecosystem ser-vice function in Chongqing City. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 2014, 34(1): 216-223 (in Chinese)
[15] Wang B (王兵), Ren X-X (任晓旭), Hu W (胡文). Service functions and value evaluation of forest ecosystem in China. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 2011, 47(2): 145-153 (in Chinese)
[16] Wang X-Y (王希义), Xu H-L (徐海量), Zhao X-F (赵新风), et al. Assessment of ecological service value of natural Populus euphratica forest reserve in Tarim Basin. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment (干旱区资源与环境), 2015, 29(3): 92-97 (in Chinese)
[17] Ma X-H (马新辉), Sun G-N (孙根年), Ren Z-Y (任志远). Determination and value evaluation of air quality of vegetation purification in Xi’an City. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment (干旱区资源与环境), 2002, 16(4): 83-86 (in Chinese)
[18] He B-Y (何宝银), Tian C-L (田成龙). Status and characteristics of soil erosion in Ningxia. Soil and Water Conservation in China (中国水土保持), 2000(8): 28-30 (in Chinese)
[19] Kong F-W (孔繁文), He N-H (何乃蕙), Gao L (高岚). Preliminary accounting of the value of China’s forest resources. Forestry Economics (林业经济), 1990(3): 15-25 (in Chinese)
[20] Sun G (孙刚). Accounting method for ecosystem services. Environmental Science Monthly (环境科学导刊), 2000, 19(8): 70-72 (in Chinese)
[21] Bian Y-X (边银霞), Shi Y-Z (石玉璋). Analysis of fresh and dried benefits of Dunhuang seedless white grapes in Gansu Province. Useful Techniques and Information of Fruit Trees (果树实用技术与信息), 2018(2): 38-40 (in Chinese)
[22] Guo H-P (郭惠萍), Tuo W-S (拓维庶), Liu Z-D (刘自东), et al. Analysis of input, output, and economic benefits of wine grape production. Chinese and Foreign Grape & Wine (中外葡萄与葡萄酒), 2013(4): 53-55 (in Chinese)
[23] Guo W-H (郭维华). Study on Water and Carbon Flux Variation and Carbon Flux Simulation of Vineyards in Arid Region of Northwest China. Master Thesis. Yang-ling: Northwest A&F University, 2010 (in Chinese)
[24] Ningxia Water Conservancy (宁夏回族自治区水利厅). Water Resources Bulletin of Ningxia in 2016 [EB/OL].(2017-12-09)[2019-01-08]. http://www.nxsl.gov.cn/slzw_4294/zfxxgk/gkml/gbxx/szygb/201803/t20180309_111360.html (in Chinese)
[25] Xiao H (肖寒), Ouyang Z-Y (欧阳志云), Zhao J-Z (赵景柱), et al. A preliminary study on the service function of forest ecosystem and its ecological economic value evaluation: A case study of Jianfengling tropical forest in Hainan Island. Chinese Journal of Applied Eco-logy (应用生态学报), 2000, 11(4): 481-484 (in Chinese)
[26] Yu X-X (余新晓), Lu S-W (鲁绍伟), Jin F (靳芳), et al. Valuation of forest ecosystem service function in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 2005, 25(8): 2096-2102 (in Chinese)
[27] Statistics Bureau of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region (宁夏回族自治区统计局). Statistical Yearbook of Ningxia (2017). Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2017 (in Chinese)
[28] Zhang L (张丽). Analysis of water resources allocation schemes for irrigation projects in the core area of the longitudinal grapevine at the eastern foot of Helan Mountain, Ningxia// International Water Ecological Security Committee of China Secretariat, Beijing Water Consul-ting Co., Ltd. Water Ecological Security-2015 Annual Excellent Papers of Water Summit Forum. Beijing: International Water Ecological Security Committee of China Secretariat, Beijing Water Consulting Co., Ltd., 2015: 9 (in Chinese)
[29] Wang Y (王莹). Development of grape industry in the whole region [EB/OL]. (2018-03-16)[2019-01-08]. http://www.nxputao.org.cn/cqgk/hlsdl/201803/t20180316_4474350.html (in Chinese)

宁夏贺兰山东麓葡萄产业生态系统服务功能价值评估

Evaluation of ecosystem service value of the grape industry at the eastern foot of Helan Mountain, Ningxia, China

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王进, 周广胜, 何奇瑾, 周莉. 内蒙古克氏针茅草原净生态系统碳交换的物候特征及遥感监测 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 659-668.
[2]	梁华秋, 沈梦晗, 邵明, 姚朋. 基于生态系统服务供需的临沂市固碳生态网络构建 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 759-768.
[3]	梁仕豪, 李文, 高宇, 刘保住. 吉林省生态系统服务价值与景观生态风险关联性及其空间分异 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 769-779.
[4]	蔡露露, 孙守家, 施光耀, 杜灵通, 倪细炉, 张劲松, 孟平. 自然状态下栓皮栎林空气负离子与PM_2.5的关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 347-353.
[5]	路昌, 蔡雪芹, 郝灿书, 刘玉珍, 王之语, 马亚男. 黄河三角洲高效生态经济区生态系统服务权衡协同关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 457-468.
[6]	于海霞, 王禹骁. 东江流域生态系统服务价值的时空演变及空间分异机制 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2498-2506.
[7]	祁育汀, 张平, 刘雷, 马雪楠, 王欢, 赵娟. 关中平原城市群土地利用结构多情景优化和生态系统服务价值预测 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2507-2517.
[8]	孔东彦, 杨灵芳, 刁静文, 郭鹏. 不同生境下氮沉降对土壤N₂O通量影响的整合分析 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(8): 2171-2177.
[9]	熊昕莹, 孟梅. 基于生态系统服务供需关系及空间流动的新疆生态管理分区与优化策略 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(8): 2237-2248.
[10]	巴晓博, 隋鑫, 刘鸣达, 解宏图, 梁超, 鲍雪莲. 东北黑土区覆盖作物-玉米间作保护性耕作的生态系统服务价值 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1883-1891.
[11]	陈红莲, 李瑞, 张玉珊, 吴清林, 袁江, 高家勇. 赤水河流域不同地貌区生态系统健康对比 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1912-1922.
[12]	黄庆阳, 谢立红, 曹宏杰, 王立民, 杨帆, 王继丰, 刘赢男, 倪红伟. 细菌对五大连池火山森林凋落物早期分解的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1941-1948.
[13]	庞丹波, 吴梦瑶, 赵娅茹, 杨娟, 董立国, 吴旭东, 陈林, 李学斌, 倪细炉, 李静尧, 梁咏亮. 贺兰山东坡不同海拔土壤微生物群落特征及其影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1957-1967.
[14]	晨阳, 李慧融, 李冬楠, 孙鹏飞, 宿江华. 锡林浩特草原净生态系统碳交换量特征及源区分布 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1509-1516.
[15]	李成龙, 周广胜, 周梦子, 周莉, 刘杰. 1971—2020年盘锦芦苇湿地净生态系统生产力及其影响因子 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1331-1340.