欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2003, Vol. ›› Issue (1): 61-65.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

低磷胁迫下不同磷效率水稻苗期根系的生理适应性研究

郭玉春, 林文雄, 石秋梅, 梁义元, 何华勤, 陈芳育   

  1. 福建农林大学作物学院, 福州 350002
  • 收稿日期:2002-09-19 修回日期:2002-11-08 出版日期:2003-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 林文雄
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(39970441);福建省科技厅百千万人才基金资助项目(99-Z-204).

Physiological adaptability of seeding rice genotypes with different P uptake effciency under low P-deficient stress

GUO Yuchun, LIN Wenxiong, SHI Qiumei, LIANG Yiyuan, HE Huaqin, CHEN Fangyu   

  1. College of Crop Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
  • Received:2002-09-19 Revised:2002-11-08 Online:2003-01-15

摘要: 以P效率差异显著的IR74(P高效型)、IR71331(中间型)及IR71379(P低效型)等3个品种为供试材料,采用水培法研究了这3类水稻在低P胁迫下P的吸收、转运及利用效率等P效率差异的原因以及P吸收动力学特征参数、R/S、酸性磷酸酯酶(acidphosphoesterase,简称APase)与核糖核酸酶(ribonuclease,简称RNase)等表现.结果表明,在低P胁迫下,P效率的高低是由水稻对P的吸收率、转运率以及利用效率综合作用的结果,存在基因型差异,P高效基因型IR74和P效率中间型的IR71331具有高的P吸收率,而IR71379P的吸收率低.不同P效率水稻在低P胁迫下,其Km、Cmin、Imax、R/S与Apase相对活性等参数表现出基因型的差异,小的Km和Cmin,大的Imax和R/S及高的APase升幅是水稻对P胁迫的生理适应性特征,也是植株在低P胁迫下较为敏感生理指标.其中各类型水稻叶片中RNase活性在低P胁迫下均表现大幅度上升,在品种间无显著差异,说明该酶是逆境胁迫并非低P胁迫的特征反应.

Abstract: The genotypic differences in Puptake efficiency of three rice varieties (IR74, IR71331 and IR71379) were studied under the P-deficiency condition with hydroponics, and their adaptability to low phosphorus stress about physio-biochemical mechanisms was further studied. The results showed that rice genotypes tolerated low Pstress resulted from the co-ordination of Puptake efficiency, internal utilization efficiency and its translocation efficiency. The higher P-efficiency type IR74 and the middle type IR71331 had a higher Puptake efficiency. The rice genotype with higher P-efficiency was characterized by higher activity and desirable kinetic parameters of H2PO4- uptake, showing lower Km and Cmin, but higher Imax values and relative APase activity,small amount of Km and Cmin. Moreover,under low Pstress, the activity of RN ase was about ten to fifteen times as high as that of the control (CK), but it had little genotypic differences.

中图分类号: