Trade-off relationship and internal mechanism of plant leaf size and number in Hulunbuir grassland, China

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202102.004

Abstract

Abstract: The trade-off between leaf size and number is the basis for plant growth strategies. It is of great significance to study the underlying mechanism of leaf size and number trade-offs for well understanding plant growth strategies. In this study, leaf size was expressed by the dry mass of single leaf, while leafing intensity was expressed by the number of leaves per unit stem volume. We used standardized major axis regression analysis method to examine the trade-off relationship between leaf size and number in Hulunbuir grassland. There was a significant negative isometric-growth trade-off between leaf size and number in Chenqicuogang (typical steppe) and Chenqibayi (meadow steppe). There was a significant negative allometric-growth trade-off between leaf size and number in Xeltala (meadow steppe). The underlying mechanism of the relationship between leaf size and number depended on the leaf and stem biomass allocation mechanism and the changes of the stem tissue density.

Key words: leaf size, leafing intensity, trade-off, biomass allocation

WANG He-qi, SONG Yan-tao, LI Qiang, FAN Gao-hua, WANG Ting, ZHOU Dao-wei , HUANG Ying-xin. Trade-off relationship and internal mechanism of plant leaf size and number in Hulunbuir grassland, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(2): 425-432.

References

[1] Yagi T, Kikuzawa K. Patterns in size-related variations in current-year shoot structure in eight deciduous tree species. Journal of Plant Research, 1999, 112: 343-352
[2] Barthelemy D, Caraglio Y. Plant architecture: A dyna-mic, multilevel and comprehensive approach to plant form, structure and ontogeny. Annals of Botany, 2007, 99: 375-407
[3] Leishman MR. Does the seed size/number trade-off model determine plant community structure? An assessment of the model mechanisms and their generality. Oikos, 2001, 93: 294-302
[4] Parkhurst DF, Loucks OL. Optimal leaf size in relation to environment. Journal of Ecology, 1972, 60: 505-537
[5] 杨冬梅, 占峰, 张宏伟. 清凉峰不同海拔木本植物小枝内叶大小-数量权衡关系. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(4): 281-291 [Yang D-M, Zhan F, Zhang H-W. Trade-off between leaf size and number in current-year twigs of deciduous broad-leaved woody species at diffe-rent altitudes on Qingliang Mountain, southeastern China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2012, 36(4): 281-291]
[6] Bonsall MB, Jansen VAA, Hassell MP. Life history trade-offs assemble ecological guilds. Science, 2004, 306: 111-114
[7] Corner EJH. The durian theory or the origin of the mo-dern tree. Annals of Botany, 1949, 13: 367-414
[8] Westoby M, Falster DS, Moles AT, et al. Plant ecological strategies: Some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systema-tics, 2002, 33: 125-159
[9] Kleiman D, Aarssen LW. The leaf size/number trade-off in trees. Journal of Ecology, 2007, 95: 376-382
[10] Yang DM, Li GY, Sun SC. The generality of leaf size versus number trade-off in temperate woody species. Annals of Botany, 2008, 102: 623-629
[11] Milla R. The leafing intensity premium hypothesis tested across clades, growth forms and altitudes. Journal of Ecology, 2009, 97: 972-983
[12] Xiang S, Wu N, Sun SC. Testing the generality of the ‘leafing intensity premium’ hypothesis in temperate broadleaved forests: A survey of variation in leaf size within and between habitats. Evolutionary Ecology, 2010, 24: 685-701
[13] Whitman T, Aarssen LW. The leaf size/number trade-off in herbaceous angiosperms. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 3: 49-58
[14] Olson ME, Aguirre HR, Rosell JA. Universal foliage-stem scaling across environments and species in dicot trees: Plasticity, biomechanics and corner’s rules. Eco-logy Letters, 2009, 12: 210-219
[15] Huang YX, Lechowicz MJ, Price CA, et al. The underlying basis for the trade-off between leaf size and leafing intensity. Functional Ecology, 2016, 30: 199-205
[16] Xiang S, Wu N, Sun SC. Within-twig biomass allocation in subtropical evergreen broad-leaved species along an altitudinal gradient: Allometric scaling analysis. Trees-Structure and Function, 2009, 23: 637-647
[17] Ackerly DD, Knight CA, Weiss SB, et al. Leaf size, specific leaf area and microhabitat distribution of chaparral woody plants: Contrasting patterns in species level and community level analyses. Oecologia, 2002, 130: 449-457
[18] Fonseca CR, Overton JM, Collins B, et al. Shifts in trait-combinations along rainfall and phosphorus gra-dients. Journal of Ecology, 2000, 88: 964-977
[19] 徐大伟. 呼伦贝尔草原区不同草地类型分布变化及分析. 博士论文. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2019 [Xu D-W. Distribution Change and Analysis of Different Grassland Types in Hulunber Grassland. PhD Thesis. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2019]
[20] Enquist BJ, Niklas KJ. Global allocation rules for patterns of biomass partitioning in seed plants. Science, 2002, 295: 1517-1520
[21] Weiner J. Allocation, plasticity and allometry in plants. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 2004, 6: 207-215
[22] Mcculloh KA, Johnson DM, Meinzer FC, et al. Hydraulic architecture of two species differing in wood density: Opposing strategies in co-occurring tropical pioneer trees. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2012, 35: 116-125
[23] Poorter H, Niklas KJ, Reich PB, et al. Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: Meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. New Phyto-logist, 2012, 193: 30-50
[24] Poorter L, Mcdonald I, Alarcon A, et al. The importance of wood traits and hydraulic conductance for the performance and life history strategies of 42 rainforest tree species. New Phytologist, 2010, 185: 481-492
[25] Price CA, Enquist BJ, Savage VM. A general model for allometric covariation in botanical form and function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007, 104: 13204-13209
[26] Poorter H, Nagel O. The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO₂, nutrients and water: A quantitative review. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2000, 27: 595-607
[27] Chave J, Coomes D, Jansen S, et al. Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum. Ecology Letters, 2009, 12: 351-366
[28] Martinez CHI, Jochen SH, Cevallos FSRS, et al. Integration of vessel traits, wood density, and height in angiosperm shrubs and trees. American Journal of Botany, 2011, 98: 915-922
[29] Aiba M, Nakashizuka T. Architectural differences associated with adult stature and wood density in 30 tempe-rate tree species. Functional Ecology, 2009, 23: 265-273
[30] 孙俊, 王满堂, 程林, 等. 不同海拔典型竹种枝叶大小异速生长关系. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(1): 165-172 [Sun J, Wang M-T, Cheng L, et al. Allometry between twig size and leaf size of typical bamboo species along an altitudinal gradient. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(1): 165-172]
[31] 王继伟, 赵成章, 陈静, 等. 高寒退化草地星毛委陵菜叶大小与数量的权衡关系. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(4): 849-854 [Wang J-W, Zhao C-Z, Chen J, et al. Trade-off between leaf size and leaf number of Potentilla acaulis in degraded alpine grassland. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2016, 35(4): 849-854]