Welcome to Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology! Today is Share:

Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology ›› 2020, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 608-614.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202002.025

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Remediation performance and mechanism of aquatic plants for iron polluted water

CHU Shu-yi1, JING Chuang-xin2, ZHANG Xia-ying2, HUANG Zhi-da3,4, XIAO Ji-bo2*   

  1. 1Wenzhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wenzhou 325006, Zhejiang, China;
    2College of Life and Environmental Science, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, Zhejiang, China;
    3Wenzhou Institute of Industry & Science, Wenzhou 325028, Zhejiang, China;
    4Wenzhou Chuangyuan Environment Technology Co. Ltd., Wenzhou 325036, Zhejiang, China
  • Received:2019-06-30 Online:2020-02-15 Published:2020-02-15
  • Contact: * E-mail: jbxiao@126.com
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Zhejiang Provincial Basic Public Research Program (LGF19E090002) and the Wenzhou Science and Technology Project (Z20160011).

Abstract: To solve the yellow colorization in water caused by iron ion, we evaluated the remediation performances of six aquatic plant species (Hygroryza aristata, Myriophyllum verticillatum, Hydrocotyle verticillata, Jussiaea stipulacea, Pistia stratiotes and Rotala rotundifolia) using hydroponic experiment. Effects of iron concentration, pH, plant biomass on iron removal were investigated, and the intensification of removing iron incurred by aeration was also discussed. Results showed that all the examined plant species could improve both divalent iron and total iron removal, but with significant difference in their performance. Divalent iron concentrations were decreased by H. aristata and H. verticillata from 5.0 mg·L-1 to 0.23 and 0.26 mg·L-1 within 24 h, respectively, meeting the standard of supplementary items for the drinking water and surface water sources (divalent iron concentration ≤0.3 mg·L-1), while total iron concentrations declined to 0.84 and 1.21 mg·L-1 with removal efficiency of 83.2% and 75.8%, respectively. Concentrations of divalent iron and total iron of plant treatment plots at pH 5, 6, 7, 8 were not significantly different, with removal efficiency of divalent iron and total iron being among 95.4%-98.4% and 92.2%-94.6%, separately. When initial divalent iron concentration was less than 5.0 mg·L-1, removal efficiency of divalent iron and total iron increased with the increases of divalent iron concentration. The growth of H. aristata was inhibited at divalent iron concentration of 10.0 mg·L-1. Total iron removal was not stable during the trial. Removal efficiency of plant treatment rose only by 7.0% compared with the control, which was much lower than other concentration treatments. The divalent iron concentration was decreased to < 0.3 mg·L-1 in 24 h at plant biomass >300 g, with no difference of removal efficiency among biomass treatments. Both intermittent and continuous aeration enhanced iron removal by H. aristata, but continuous aeration was more favorable for the removal of total iron due to stabilization.