Welcome to Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology! Today is Share:

Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Influence of drought on leaf photosynthetic capacity and root growth of soybeans at grain filling stage.

GUO Shu-jin1, YANG Kai-min1, HUO Jin1, ZHOU Yong-hang1, WANG Yan-ping2, LI Gui-quan1   

  1. (1College of Agriculture, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu 030801, Shanxi, China; 2Mudanjiang Branch of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Mudanjiang 157041, Heilongjiang, China)
  • Online:2015-05-18 Published:2015-05-18

Abstract: A droughtresistant soybean cultivar Jinda 70 and a droughtsensitive soybean cultivar Jindou 26 were taken as test materials. At the grain filling stage, the cultivars were subject to three water treatments including sufficient water supply, light drought stress, and severe drought stress by using pot experiments for research on influence of drought on leaf photosynthetic capacity and root growth of soybeans. The results showed that as the degree of drought stress was aggravated, all of the indices including leaf area, chlorophyll content, net photosynthetic rates (Pn), stomatal conductance (gs), transpiration rate (Tr), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), plant mass, plant height, seed yield, and harvest index in the two cultivars declined. The root length and root mass increased under light drought stress, and decreased under severe drought stress. Rootshoot ratio ascended as the degree of drought stress was aggravated. Under severe drought stress, the increase of rootshoot ratio of the droughtresistant soybean cultivar Jinda 70 was up to 135.7%, which was higher than the that (116.7%) of the droughtsensitive soybean cultivar Jindou 26. Simultaneously, leaf area and chlorophyll content in Jinda 70 were respectively 69.3% and 85.5% of those in the control, which were better than those of Jindou 26. gs and Pn  of Jinda 70 respectively declined 67.9% and 77.9%, but still lower than those of Jindou 26. Therefore, the decline range of harvest index of Jinda 70 was 43.8%, which was lower than the range of 78.8% of Jindou 26. The Biplot revealed that under different dry treatments, there were significant positive correlations among the six indexes including leaf area, chlorophyll content, Pn, gs, Tr, and Ci of the two cultivars. There were also significant positive correlations among the six indices including plant mass, plant height, root length, root mass, seed yield, and harvest index. Rootshoot ratio only had significant positive correlation with root mass and had significant negative correlations with other five indices.