Welcome to Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology! Today is Share:

Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Development mechanism of concentrated poverty areas under the sustainable livelihood: The example of the developmentrestricted ecological district of Ningxia, Northwest China.

ZHONG Jun-tao1, MI Wen-bao2, FAN Xin-gang3, YANG Mei-ling2   

  1. (1School of Agriculture, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China; 2School of Resources and Environment, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China; 3Department of Science and Technology, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China)
  • Online:2015-09-18 Published:2015-09-18

Abstract: Livelihood capital has a close relationship with the income and expenditure of farmers’ households. For example, the survival strategies of farmers’ households are determined by it and it also influences regional development mechanisms and models. Under the analysis framework of sustainable livelihoods, this study evaluated farmers’ livelihood capital, income, and expenditure, based on a participatory rural appraisal and a statistical method, in the developmentrestricted ecological district of Ningxia, decomposed into the nationality, terrain, and type of farmers’ household. Further, by using an index of non-farm business households, the correlations between the livelihood capital and income with the expenditure of farmers’ households and the index of non-farm business households were quantified to understand the mechanism of regional development. The results showed that livelihood capital was generally low in the study area. In particular, the livelihood capital of Hui nationality households was slightly higher than that of Han nationality households, that of river valley households was higher than that of mountain households, and that of combined occupation households and non-farm business households was significantly higher than that of agricultural households. Moreover, there was a significant positive correlation between the net annual income of farmers’ households and the nonagricultural index, human capital, physical capital, and financial capital, while a significant negative correlation existed between net annual income and natural capital. These findings suggested that efforts were required to enhance the capacity of the nonagricultural index and the human, material, and other capital in the study area. They also served as a guideline for the circulation of peasants’ means of production in order to accelerate the polarization of natural capital.