Welcome to Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology! Today is Share:

Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology ›› 2016, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (5): 1503-1510.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201605.034

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of phosphorus fertilizer application methods and types on the yield and phosphorus uptake of winter wheat.

JIANG Shang-tao1,2, WANG Huo-yan1*, ZHOU Jian-min1, CHEN Zhao-ming1,2, LIU Xiao-wei1,2, JIA Yun-sheng1,2   

  1. 1State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China;
    2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2015-11-09 Online:2016-05-18 Published:2016-05-18

Abstract: A field micro-plot experiment was conducted to determine the effect of different placement methods and types of phosphorus (P) fertilizer on winter wheat growth and phosphorus uptake. P fertilizer types included monocalcium phosphate (MCP) and diammonium phosphate (DAP). P fertilizer application methods included: 1) surface broadcasting (S); 2) banding 5 cm below seeds (B0); 3) banding 5 cm below and 3 cm away from seeds (B3); 4) banding 5 cm below and 10 cm away from seeds (B10); 5) mixing with the 20% of the top soil below seeds (M). The result showed that B0 had the best effect on increasing yield, reached 7.63 t·hm-2 in MCP-B0 and 7.99 t·hm-2 in DAP-B0, which increased 10.3% and 10.7%, respectively compared with surface broadcasting. B10 had the lowest grain yield (6.60-6.77 t·hm-2). The total P uptake by wheat in B0 and M was at a relatively high level (34.42-35.60 kg·hm-2), B10 performed worst at all growth stages of wheat, while P uptake of DAP-B10 was 11.9% higher than MCP-B10. These results indicated that concentrating P fertilizer in a short distance near the seeds was an optimized application method for winter wheat in this region, and DAP performed better than MCP on P uptake and utilization of wheat under far banding.