Welcome to Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology! Today is Share:

Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology ›› 2016, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (3): 973-980.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201603.040

• reviews • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Research progress on the mechanisms and influence factors of nitrogen retention and transformation in riparian ecosystems

YANG Dan1,2, FAN Da-yong1, XIE Zong-qiang1*, ZHANG Ai-ying1,2, XIONG Gao-ming1, ZHAO Chang-ming1, XU Wen-ting1   

  1. 1State Key Laboratory of Ve-getation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China;
    2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2015-07-01 Online:2016-03-18 Published:2016-03-18
  • Contact: * E-mail: xie@ibcas.ac.cn
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by West Action Plan of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KZCX2-XB3-09).

Abstract: Riparian zone, the ecological transition buffer between terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems (rivers, lakes, reservoirs, wetlands, and other specific water bodies) with unique eco-hydrological and biogeochemical processes, is the last ecological barrier to prevent ammonium, nitrate and other non-point nitrogen pollutants from adjacent water bodies. Based on a summary of current progress of related studies, we found there were two major mechanisms underpinning the nitrogen retention/removal by the riparian ecosystems: 1) the relative locations of nitrogen in the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum system could be altered by riparian vegetation; 2) nitrogen could also be denitrified and then removed permanently by microorganisms in riparian soil. However, which process is more critical for the nitrogen removal remains elusive. Due to large variances of hydro-dynamic, vegetation, microbial, and soil substrate properties in nitrogen retention and transformation with various watersheds, it’s difficult to identify which factor is the most important one driving nitrogen cycle in the riparian ecosystems. It is also found that the limitation of study methods, paucity of data at large spatial and temporal scale, and no consensus on the riparian width, are the three major reasons leading to large variances of the results among studies. In conclusion, it is suggested that further efforts should be focused on: 1) the detailed analysis on the successive environmental factors with long-term; 2) the application of a comprehensive method combining mathematical models, geographic information system, remote sensing and quantified technique (such as the coupled technique of the isotopic tracer and gas exchange measurement); 3) the implementation of studies at large temporal and spatial scales. It is sure that, these efforts can help to optimize the nitrogen removal pathways in the riparian ecosystems and provide scientific basis for ecosystem management.