Welcome to Chinese Journal of Ecology! Today is Share:

cje ›› 2011, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (09): 2099-2106.

• Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Simulation of water and carbon fluxes in Harvard forest area by using improved Biome-BGC model.

ZHANG Ting-long1,2,3, SUN Rui1,2,3**, HU Bo4, FENG Li-chao1,2,3, ZHANG Rong-hua1,2,3   

  1. 1State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Jointly Sponsored by Beijing Normal University and the Institute of Remote Sensing Applications of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100875, China; 2 School of Geography and Remote Sensing Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China; 3 Beijing Key Lab for Remote Sensing of Environment and Digital Cities, Beijing 100875, China; 4Ningbo Meteorological Bureau, Ningbo 315012, Zhejiang, China
  • Online:2011-09-08 Published:2011-09-08

Abstract: Using Biome-BGC model can simulate vegetation productivity through the coupling of water and CO2 exchange processes between vegetation,soil and atmosphere, but the soil water balance module is not perfect enough, leading to a large deviation between simulated and observed values under condition of a long time no precipitation. Aiming at this problem, this paper improved and adjusted the equation of stomatal conductance stressed by soil water, the calculation formula of evapotranspiration, and the process of soil water loss in Biome-BGC model. Using this improved model, the evapotranspiration and vegetation productivity in Harvard Forest area were simulated, and compared with field observations. The accuracy of simulated results by the improved model enhanced obviously, with the evapotranspiration R2 between simulated and observed values increased from 0.483 to 0.617, NEE R2 increased from 0.658 to 0.813, root mean square error (RMSE) of annual evapotranspiration decreased averagely by 48.7%, and annual sum squared error (ASSE) of NEE decreased averagely by 39.8%, which suggested that the simulated results by using the improved model were more close to the observed results.

Key words: East China Sea, Mesocosm, Interspecific competition