Welcome to Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology! Today is Share:

Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology ›› 2016, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (4): 1125-1134.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201604.020

• Original Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Carbon storage and allocation in Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations with different stand ages.

LAN Si-an1,2,3, DU Hu1,2, ZENG Fu-ping1,2, SONG Tong-qing1,2*, PENG Wan-xia1,2, HAN Chang1,2,4, CHEN Li1,2,4, SU Liang1,2,4   

  1. 1Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, China;
    2Huanjiang Observation and Research Station of Karst Ecosystem, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Huanjiang 547100, Guangxi, China;
    3University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    4College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
  • Received:2015-08-26 Revised:2016-01-21 Online:2016-04-22 Published:2016-04-22
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Program of Science and Technology Service Network Initiative (STS), Chinese Academy of Sciences (KFJ-EW-STS-092), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31370485,31370623,31400412,31460135), Guangxi Provincial Benefiting Program of Science and Technology (1599001-6) and Guangxi Provincial Program of Distinguished Expert in China.

Abstract: Based on survey of 45 plots (1000 m2 each) of five different stand ages, i.e., young, middle-aged, pre-mature, mature, and over-mature plantations, in the main production area of Cunninghamia lanceolata in the north of Guangxi, China, carbon (C) storage and its allocation in vegetation and soil were studied. The results showed that total carbon storage of C. lanceolata plantations changed in the order of over-mature plantation (345.59 t·hm-2) > mature plantation (331.14 t·hm-2) > pre-mature plantation (299.11 t·hm-2) > young plantation (187.60 t·hm-2) > middle-aged plantation (182.81 t·hm-2). For all the stand ages, soil stored the greatest amount of carbon, C pool in vegetation layer was the second, while C storage in the litter layer was lowest. On average, C storage in belowground layer was greater than that in aboveground layer. Carbon storage in aboveground vegetation layer ranged from 34.80 to 134.55 t·hm-2, which contributed 18.6% to 38.9% to the total ecosystem carbon storage and increased with ages. Carbon storage in the litter layer ranged from 1.26 to 2.07 t·hm-2, which only contributed 0.4%-1.1% to the total ecosystem carbon storage. Carbon storage in the soil layer ranged from 149.24 to 206.02 t·hm-2 and represented 61.9%-80.0% of ecosystem carbon storage. Canopy layer stored the highest amount of carbon (33.51-133.7 t·hm-2) and comprised 92.8%-98.9% of aboveground vegetation carbon storage. Within the canopy layer, carbon storage differed with compartments. Stems stored the highest amount of carbon (20.98-95.68 t·hm-2) by accounting for 62.6%-72.6% of carbon storage in the canopy layer, which increased with ages. The branches and leaves accounted for 4.8%-11.0% and 11.1%-14.2% of C stored in the canopy layer, respectively, which all decreased with ages, while increased to some extent in the over-mature plantation. Roots occupied 11.3%-12.3% of carbon storage in the canopy layer with small fluctuation with the stand age.