Welcome to Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology! Today is Share:

Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology ›› 2016, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (10): 3247-3256.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201610.031

• CONTENTS • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of N application reduction and fertilizing distance on saving fertilizer and improving yield in maize/soybean intercropping system

CHEN Ping1, DU Qing1, ZHOU Li1, YANG Huan1, DONG Qian2, SONG Chun3, YANG Wen-yu1, YONG Tai-wen1*   

  1. 1College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University/Ministry of Agriculture Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Cultivation in Southwest, Chengdu 611130, China;
    2Shehong Bureau of Agriculture, Suining 629200, Sichuan, China;
    3College of Environmental Sciences, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China;
  • Received:2016-02-29 Published:2016-10-18
  • Contact: * E-mail: yongtaiwen@sicau.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31271669) and the Special Scientific Research Fund in the Public Interest (Agriculture, 201203096).

Abstract: To study the effect of N supplied levels and fertilization distances on saving fertilizer and improving yield in maize/soybean intercropping system, a field experiment was carried out with three N supplying levels ( RN1: 210 kg N·hm-2, RN2: 270 kg N·hm-2 and CN: 330 kg N·hm-2) and four fertilizing distances (D1: 0 cm, D2: 15 cm, D3: 30 cm and D4: 45 cm, indicating the distance between fertilizing site and maize in narrow row). Compared with CN, the results showed that dry matter accumulation and translocation, and their contribution to grain of post-anthesis maize under RN2 were increased by 1.4%, 23.0% and 16.0%, respectively. Meanwhile, kernel number per ear and grain yield per plant of maize were increased by 1.6% and 4.9%. For soybean, dry matter accumulation and translocation, and their contribution to grain at pre-anthesis under RN2 were increased by 2.1%, 37.9% and 26.9%, respectively. Both of soybean grain number and yield per plant were increased by 7.3%. For the maize-soybean intercropping system, N uptake and use efficiency of RN2 were 5.0% and 44.4% higher than those of CN. The soil N content of maize was raised by 4.1% under RN2, but decreased by 0.8% for soybean. The saving fertilizer and improving yield effect of D2 were the best among all the fertilizing distances. Under RN2, contribution rate of dry matter accumulation to grain after anthesis and kernel number per ear of maize in D2 were 57.2% and 9.4% higher than those of D1. Compared with D4, the contribution rate of dry matter accumulation to grain before anthesis and grain number per plant of soybean in D2 were increased by 335.2% and 2.4%, respectively. For the maize/soybean intercropping system, N uptake and use efficiency of D2 were 15.1% and 112.4% greater than those of D1, and 21.4% and 66.3% higher than those of D4. The total soil N content of maize in D2 was 6.6% higher than that of D1, and the index for soybean was 16.0% higher than that of D4. Appropriate N application reduction and fertilizing distance would be beneficial to transfer dry matter to grain, improve grain number per plant, 100-grain mass and yield, promote N uptake and increase fertilizer use efficiency in the intercropping system, which could achieve the purpose of saving fertilizer and improving yield.