Welcome to Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology! Today is Share:

Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology ›› 2018, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 997-1005.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201803.018

Previous Articles     Next Articles

A diachronic study on resettlers’ perceptions toward ecological relocation in world heritage site: A case study of Wulingyuan Scenic Area, China.

WANG Kai, CHEN Qin-chang, LI Zhi-miao*   

  1. Tourism College of Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
  • Received:2017-07-27 Online:2018-03-18 Published:2018-03-18
  • Contact: * E-mail: kingviry@163.com
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (D010202) and the Key Scientific Research Project of Education Department of Hunan Province (14A088)

Abstract: Perceptions of residents in ecological resettlement area are important for evaluating the implementation effect of ecological relocation and sustainable development of world heritage site. With the residents from three different resettlement communities in Wulingyuan Scenic Area as the research object, we carried out a diachronic study on changes of the resettlers’ perceptions of ecological relocation at different times and the main driving factors based on systematic survey data in 2010 and 2016. The results showed that in the year 2010 and 2016, resettlers reacted negatively to the indicators such as “enhancement of employment opportunity”, “improvement of education and training opportunity”, “enhanced environment in scenic area”, “recognizing the identity change ‘from rural to non-rural’ after relocation”. They favored the indicators such as “undermining traditional value”, “lack of supervision during the implementation of policies”. In 2016, resettlers of different gender, age and average monthly income had substantial different opinions on the economic and psychological impacts of ecological relocation. Education and income level had great impacts on their opinions of ecological relocation policies. Resettlers relocated by the way of investment for developing perceived were more sensitive to the economic impacts. Economic and policy impacts became the dominant driving factors for their general perception of ecological relocation. They pay more attention to employment, children’s education opportunity as well as social security system for relocation.