Welcome to Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology! Today is Share:

Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 370-378.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201902.013

• Special Features of Soil Physics and Ecological Enviornment • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of soil organic matter, bulk density and clay content in small watersheds under different ecological managements of Loess Plateau, China.

HUANG Yan-li1,2, LI Zhan-bin1,3,4*, SU Hui5, WANG Shan-shan4, LI Yao-lin6, LIU Chen-guang1   

  1. 1State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dry-land Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China;
    2College of Surveying and Land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, Henan, China;
    3Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Northwest Water Resources and Environment Ecology, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China;
    4Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Acade-my of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China;
    5School of Life Science and Technology, Xinxiang University, Xinxiang 453003, Henan, China;
    6Xifeng Experiment Station of Soil and Water Conservation, Yellow River Conservancy Committee, Xifeng 745000, Gansu, China
  • Received:2018-06-27 Revised:2018-12-17 Online:2019-02-20 Published:2019-02-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Key Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (41330858).

Abstract: To explore the effects of small watersheds with different ecological managements on soil properties, the spatial differences of soil organic matter (SOM), bulk density (BD), and clay content (CC) in the four facets, including slope aspect, slope position, zone, and soil layer, were analyzed between Yangjiagou (YJG, artificial Robinia pseudoacacia forest watershed) and Dongzhuanggou (DZG, closed grassland watershed). The results showed that SOM, BD and CC were 12.78 g·kg-1, 1.24 g·cm-3, 19.2% for YJG and 11.13 g·kg-1, 1.21 g·cm-3, 18.2% for DZG, respectively. The values for YJG were slightly higher than those for DZG, but the difference was insignificant. All indices in the east slope were bigger than those in the west slope. Across different slope positions, the variation of BD was small, SOM and CC showed increasing trends from top to bottom. BD and CC declined downward the watershed, whereas SOM changed in an opposite trend. From the soil surface down to 60 cm soil depth, BD and CC increased and SOM decreased. The spatial sensitivity followed CC > SOM > BD, and the effects of the spatial factors can be ordered as soil layer > zone > slope aspect > slope position. There were significant differences in CC of the upper reaches, BD and CC of the middle reaches between the two basins. The sensitivity of each index to slope position, zone and soil layer in YJG was lower than that in DZG.

Key words: ecological management, small watershed, soil bulk density, clay content, soil organic matter