Identification of keystone predators in Haizhou Bay food web based on the revised SURF index

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202011.040

Abstract

Abstract: Keystone predator species play an important role in regulating the number, richness and distribution of prey species. Based on the bottom trawl surveys in Haizhou Bay, keystone predator species in fish communities were identified by the revised SURF (supportive role to fishery ecosystems) index. Conger myriaster, Saurida elongata, Hexagrammos otakii, Chelidonichthys spinosus, and Larimichthys polyactis were the keystone predators in the fish community. They had high number of nodes degree, and were also the main predators of many species. Further, they had strong ability of clustering. The fluctuations of their density would have great impacts on ecosystem energy flow and food web structure. The method not only considered the feeding ratio between species, but also took the amount of catch and abundance of species as important factors in the identification of keystone predators. Compared with the traditional method, this method had great improvement and provided a new one for the identification of key predators. Our results showed that the strong inter-specific interactions played an important role in maintaining the structure and function of food webs. Protection of key predators would benefit the stability of biological communities and species diversity. Therefore, ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) should give priority to the protection of key species. The important economic fish species, C. myriaster and L. polyactis, should be protected with high priority as they suffered from higher fishing pressure.

Key words: keystone predator, food composition, SURF index, Haizhou Bay

XU Cong-jun, ZHANG Chong-liang, XU Bin-duo, REN Yi-ping, XUE Ying. Identification of keystone predators in Haizhou Bay food web based on the revised SURF index[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(11): 3889-3894.

References

[1] Paine RT. A note on trophic complexity and community stability. American Naturalist, 1969, 103: 91-93
[2] 李忠义, 吴强, 单秀娟, 等. 渤海鱼类群落结构关键种. 中国水产科学, 2018, 25(2): 229-236 [Li Z-Y, Wu Q, Shan X-J, et al. Keystone species of fish community structure in the Bohai Sea. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China, 2018, 25(2): 229-236]
[3] 葛宝明, 鲍毅新, 郑祥. 生态学中关键种的研究综述. 生态学杂志, 2004, 23(6): 102-106 [Ge B-M, Bao Y-X, Zheng X. A review on key species study in ecology. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2004, 23(6): 102-106]
[4] Plagányi ÉE, Essington TE. When the SURFs up, forage fish are key. Fisheries Research, 2014, 159: 68-74
[5] Kaplan IC, Francis TB, Punt AE, et al. A multi-model approach to understanding the role of Pacific sardine in the California current food web. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 2019, 617: 307-321
[6] Eddy TD, Lotze HK, Fulton EA, et al. Ecosystem effects of invertebrate fisheries. Fish and Fisheries, 2017, 18: 40-53
[7] Eddy TD, Coll M, Fulton EA, et al. Trade-offs between invertebrate fisheries catches and ecosystem impacts in coastal New Zealand. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 2015, 72: 1380-1388
[8] Xu BD, Ren YP, Chen Y, et al. Optimization of stratification scheme for a fishery-independent survey with multiple objectives. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2015, 34: 154-169
[9] Xu BD, Zhang CL, Ren YP, et al. Optimization of sampling effort for a fishery-independent survey with multiple goals. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2015, 187: 252
[10] 郑晓春, 戴小杰, 朱江峰, 等. 太平洋中东部海域大眼金枪鱼胃含物分析. 南方水产科学, 2015, 11(1): 75-80 [Zheng X-C, Dai X-J, Zhu J-F, et al. Analysis on stomach content of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) in the eastern-central Pacific Ocean. South China Fisheries Science, 2015, 11(1): 75-80]
[11] 王荣夫, 张崇良, 徐宾铎, 等. 海州湾秋季小眼绿鳍鱼的摄食策略及食物选择性. 中国水产科学, 2018, 25(5): 1059-1070 [Wang R-F, Zhang C-L, Xu B-D, et al. Feeding strategy and prey selectivity of Chelidonichthys spinosus during autumn in Haizhou Bay. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China, 2018, 25(5): 1059-1070]
[12] 林群, 李显森, 李忠义, 等. 基于Ecopath模型的莱州湾中国对虾增殖生态容量. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(4): 1131-1140 [Lin Q, Li X-S, Li Z-Y, et al. Ecological carrying capacity of Chinese shrimp stock enhancement in Laizhou Bay of East China based on Ecopath model. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2013, 24(4): 1131-1140]
[13] 蒋晓辉, 刘晓燕, 张曙光, 等. 黄河干流水生态系统关键物种的识别. 人民黄河, 2005(10): 1-3, 78 [Jiang X-H, Liu X-Y, Zhang S-G, et al. Distinguishing key species of aquatic ecosystem of the main Yellow River. Yellow River, 2005(10): 1-3, 78]
[14] Vasas V, Jordán F. Topological keystone species in ecological interaction networks: Considering link quality and non-trophic effects. Ecological Modelling, 2006, 19: 365-378
[15] 杨涛, 单秀娟, 金显仕, 等. 莱州湾鱼类群落的关键种. 水产学报, 2016, 40(10): 1613-1623 [Yang T, Shan X-J, Jin X-S, et al. Keystone species of fish community in the Laizhou Bay. Journal of Fisheries of China, 2016, 40(10): 1613-1623]
[16] 高世科, 于雯雯, 张硕. 基于稳定同位素方法的吕泗渔场近岸海域夏季主要生物营养级. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(1): 301-308 [Gao S-K, Yu W-W, Zhang S. Trophic level of main organisms in coastal water of Lyusi fishing ground based on stable isotope method. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(1): 301-308]
[17] 吴筱桐, 丁翔翔, 江旭, 等. 海州湾鱼类群落平均营养级和大型鱼类指数的变化特征. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(8): 2829-2836 [Wu X-T, Ding X-X, Jiang X, et al. Variations in the mean trophic level and large fish index of fish community in Haizhou Bay, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(8): 2829-2836]
[18] 唐峰华, 沈新强, 王云龙. 海州湾附近海域渔业资源的动态分析. 水产科学, 2011, 30(6): 335-341 [Tang F-H, Shen X-Q, Wang Y-L. Dynamics of fishe-ries resources near Haizhou Bay waters. Fisheries Science, 2011, 30(6): 335-341]
[19] Rodhouse PO. Role as consumers. Philosophical Tran-sactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 1996, 351: 1003-1022
[20] 刘军. 长江上游特有鱼类受威胁及优先保护顺序的定量分析. 中国环境科学, 2004, 24(4): 395-399 [Liu J. A quantitative analysis on threat and priority of conservation order of the endemic fishes in upper reaches of the Yangtze River. China Environmental Science, 2004, 24(4): 395-399]
[21] Bascompte J, Melian CJ, Sala E. Interaction strength combinations and the overfishing of a marine food web. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102: 5443-5447
[22] Quince C, Higgs PG, Mckane AJ. Topological structure and interaction strengths in model food webs. Ecological Modelling, 2005, 187: 389-412
[23] Navia AF, Cruz-Escalona VH, Giraldo A, et al. The structure of a marine tropical food web, and its implications for ecosystem-based fisheries management. Ecological Modelling, 2016, 328: 23-33
[24] Deruiter PC, Neutel AM, Moore JC. Energetics, patterns of interaction strengths, and stability in real ecosystems. Science, 1995, 269: 1257-1260
[25] Zhao L, Zhang H, O'Gorman EJ, et al. Weighting and indirect effects identify keystone species in food webs. Ecology Letters, 2016, 19: 1032-1040
[26] 唐启升. 海洋食物网与高营养层次营养动力学研究策略. 海洋水产研究, 1999(2): 1-6 [Tang Q-S. Strategies of research on marine food web and trophodynamics between high trophic levels. Marine Fisheries Research, 1999(2): 1-6]
[27] 孙刚, 盛连喜. 生态系统关键种理论的研究进展. 动物学杂志, 2000, 35(4): 53-57 [Sun G, Sheng L-X. Developments of the studies on the theory of keystone species in ecosystems. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 2000, 35(4): 53-57]
[28] 杜洪业, 徐程扬. 森林生态系统中关键种与群落动态的关系研究进展. 世界林业研究, 2012, 25(5): 35-39 [Du H-Y, Xu C-Y. Research progress of the relationship between keystone species and the dynamic of community in forestry ecosystem. World Forestry Research, 2012, 25(5): 35-39]