Regional ecological compensation accounting in Fuzhou City based on a payment for ecosystem services (PES)model

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.009

Abstract

Abstract: The determination of regional ecological compensation quota and spatial selection are key issues in the study of horizontal transfer payment ecological compensation mechanism. Taking 12 districts of Fuzhou City as the basic research unit, we accounted the ecological function values of forest, grassland, wetland, agriculture, and marine ecosystems in 2015 and 2018. Combined with local economic development situation, we constructed an ecological compensation model. With this model, we determined the ecological compensation quota and spatial distribution of different ecosystems in various districts and counties of Fuzhou. The results showed that from 2015 to 2018, Gulou District had the largest ecological payment, with 36.384 billion yuan, followed by Mawei, Cangshan and Jin’an districts, with 7.809, 6.974 and 6.669 billion yuan, respectively. Luoyuan County and Taijiang District had lower payment, which were 2.942 and 1.903 billion yuan respectively. Among the areas requiring ecological compensation, Lianjiang County and Changle District had high compensation quotas, being 25.120 and 20.261 billion yuan, followed by Yongtai County (12.570 billion yuan). The compensation amounts in Minhou County, Fuqing City and Minqing County were less than 10 billion yuan. The distribution of ecological compensation differed across various ecosystems. In general, the main ecological compensation areas of forest, grassland, wetland and agriculture ecosystem were in Yongtai, Minqing, Minhou, Lianjiang and Luoyuan counties. The compensation amounts were 2.424-31.379 billion yuan in forest, 1.181-20.708 billion yuan in grassland, 1.015-45.493 billion yuan in wetland, and 5.780-23.954 billion yuan in cropland. The main regions that need compensation for marine ecosystem were Lianjiang County, Changle District, and Fuqing City, with the amount of compensation being 8.216-47.854 billion yuan. The results could properly reflect the coordinated development of regional ecological and economic conditions, which could provide a reference for the improvement of the ecological compensation mechanism in Fuzhou City.

Key words: regional ecological compensation, ecosystem regulation services value, Fuzhou City.

NIU Le, WANG Jiao-yue, XI Feng-ming, YIN Yan, BING Long-fei, MA Ming-jing, ZHANG Wen-feng. Regional ecological compensation accounting in Fuzhou City based on a payment for ecosystem services (PES)model[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(11): 3805-3814.

References 36

[1]	毛显强, 钟瑜, 张胜. 生态补偿的理论探讨. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2002, 12(4): 40-43 [Mao X-Q, Zhong Y, Zhang S. Conception, theory and mechanism of eco-compensation. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2002, 12(4): 40-43]
[2]	黄征学. 地区间横向生态补偿制度的内涵特征. 区域经济评论, 2015(6): 124-129 [Huang Z-X. The chara-cteristics and connotation of regional horizontal ecological compensation. Regional Economic Review, 2015(6): 124-129]
[3]	王思博, 李冬冬, 李婷伟. 新中国70年生态环境保护实践进展: 由污染治理向生态补偿的演变. 当代经济管理, 2021, 43(6): 36-42 [Wang S-B, Li D-D, Li T-W. Development of ecological environment protection in PRC in the past 70 years: Evolution from pollution control to ecological compensation. Contemporary Economic Management, 2021, 43(6): 36-42]
[4]	王德凡. 基于区域生态补偿机制的横向转移支付制度理论与对策研究. 华东经济管理, 2018, 32(1): 62-68 [Wang D-F. Research on the theory and countermeasures of horizontal transfer payment system based on regional ecological compensation mechanism. East China Economic Management, 2018, 32(1): 62-68]
[5]	王女杰, 刘建, 吴大千, 等. 基于生态系统服务价值的区域生态补偿——以山东省为例. 生态学报, 2010, 30(23): 6646-6653 [Wang N-J, Liu J, Wu D-Q, et al. Regional eco-compensation based on ecosystem service assessment: A case study of Shandong Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(23): 6646-6653]
[6]	袁广达, 杜星博, 孙笑. 流域生态补偿横向转移支付标准量化范式——基于生态损害成本核算的视角. 财会通讯, 2021(11): 3-10 [Yuan G-D, Du X-B, Sun X. Quantitative paradigm of horizontal transfer payment standard for watershed ecological compensation: Based on the perspective of ecological damage cost accounting. Communication of Finance and Accounting, 2021(11): 3-10]
[7]	郑湘萍, 何炎龙. 我国生态补偿机制市场化建设面临的问题及对策研究. 广西社会科学, 2020(4): 66-72 [Zheng X-P, He Y-L. Research on the problems and countermeasures of the marketization construction of ecological compensation mechanism in China. Social Sciences in Guangxi, 2020(4): 66-72]
[8]	饶清华, 林秀珠, 邱宇, 等. 基于机会成本的闽江流域生态补偿标准研究. 海洋环境科学, 2018, 37(5): 655-662 [Rao Q-H, Lin X-Z, Qiu Y, et al. Research on ecological compensation standard in Minjiang River basin based on the opportunity cost. Marine Environmental Science, 2018, 37(5): 655-662]
[9]	Li H, Yang XH, Zhang X, et al. Estimation of rural households' willingness to accept two PES programs and their service valuation in the Miyun Reservoir Catchment, China. Sustainability, 2018, 10: 1-15
[10]	潘美晨, 宋波. 受偿意愿在确定生态补偿标准上下限中的作用. 中国环境科学, 2021, 41(4): 1932-1939 [Pan M-C, Song B. The role of willingness to accept in determining the upper of lower limit of eco-compensation standard. China Environmental Science, 2021, 41(4): 1932-1939]
[11]	吴强, Peng Yuanying, 马恒运, 等. 森林生态系统服务价值及其补偿校准——以马尾松林为例. 生态学报, 2019, 39(1): 117-130 [Wu Q, Peng Y-Y, Ma H-Y, et al. Research on the value of forest ecosystem services and compensation in a Pinus massoniana forest. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(1): 117-130]
[12]	王璟睿, 陈龙, 张燚, 等. 国内外生态补偿研究进展及实践. 环境与可持续发展, 2019, 44(2): 121-125 [Wang J-R, Chen L, Zhang Y, et al. Research process and practice of ecological compensation in China and abroad. Environment and Sustainable Development, 2019, 44(2): 121-125]
[13]	Pei S, Zhang C, Liu C, et al. Forest ecological compensation standard based on spatial flowing of water services in the upper reaches of Miyun Reservoir, China. Ecosystem Services, 2019, 39, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100983
[14]	仲俊涛, 王蓓, 米文宝, 等. 基于InVEST模型的宁夏盐池县禁牧草地生态补偿标准空间识别. 地理科学, 2020, 40(6): 1019-1028 [Zhong J-T, Wang B, Mi W-B, et al. Spatial recognition of ecological compensation standard for grazing grassland in Yanchi County based on InVEST model. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(6): 1019-1028]
[15]	朱弘业, 张守志, 佟守正, 等. 中国东北地区湿地生态补偿策略研究. 湿地科学, 2018, 16(5): 651-657 [Zhu H-Y, Zhang S-Z, Tong S-Z, et al. Ecological compensation strategy for wetlands in northeast China. Wetland Science, 2018, 16(5): 651-657]
[16]	杨欣, 尚光引, 李研, 等. 农户农田生态补偿方式选择偏好及其影响因素研究——基于农户分化视角的实证. 中国农业资源与区划, 2020, 41(10): 131-137 [Yang X, Shang G-Y, Li Y, et al. Research on the farmland ecological compensation patterns and its influen-cing factors: From the perspective of farmers'differentiation. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2020, 41(10): 131-137]
[17]	朱冰莹, 陈留根, 盛婧, 等. 稻麦两熟农田径流养分循环利用模式的能值分析与生态补偿标准测算. 农业资源与环境学报, 2019, 36(5): 592-599 [Zhu B-Y, Chen L-G, Sheng J, et al. Emergy analysis and ecological compensation standard of the runoff nutrient recycling system in rice-wheat rotation systems. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2019, 36(5): 592-599]
[18]	蔡玉莹, 于冰. 基于CVM的海洋保护区生态补偿标准及影响因素研究——以嵊泗马鞍列岛为例. 海洋环境科学, 2021, 40(1): 107-113 [Cai Y-Y, Yu B. The standard and its influencing factors of ecological compensation on marine protected areas based on CVM: A case study of Shengsi Ma’an Islands. Marine Environmental Science, 2021, 40(1): 107-113]
[19]	倪琪, 徐涛, 李晓平, 等. 跨区域流域生态补偿标准核算——基于成本收益双视角. 长江流域资源与环境, 2021, 30(1): 97-110 [Ni Q, Xu T, Li X-P, et al. Transboundary river basin ecological compensation standard accounting: Based on cost-benefit perspective. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2021, 30(1): 97-110]
[20]	李智, 张小林, 李红波. 基于PES模型的区域生态补偿额度的测算研究——以江苏省为例. 国土与自然资源研究, 2014(5): 40-44 [Li Z, Zhang X-L, Li H-B. Accounting for eco-compensation based on a PES model: A case study of Jiangsu Province. Territory and Natural Resources Study, 2014(5): 40-44]
[21]	靳乐山, 刘晋宏, 孔德帅. 将GEP纳入生态补偿绩效考核评估分析. 生态学报, 2019, 39(1): 24-36 [Jin L-S, Liu J-H, Kong D-S. Evaluation of the incorporation of gross ecosystem product into performance appraisals for ecological compensation. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(1): 24-36]
[22]	Lin YS, Guo ZX, Zheng YM, et al. Net horizontal payments for ecosystem services: An application in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region of China. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2019, 10: 63-68
[23]	Jin Y, Huang JF, Peng DL. A new quantitative model of ecological compensation based on ecosystem capital in Zhejiang Province, China. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B: Biomedicine and Biotechnology, 2009, 10: 301-305
[24]	徐瑞蓉. 综合性生态补偿制度设计与实践进路——以福建省为例. 福建论坛: 人文社会科学版, 2020(6): 136-142 [Xu R-R. Comprehensive ecological compensation system design and practice approach road: A case study of Fujian Province. Fujian Tribune: Humanities and Social Sciences, 2020(6): 136-142]
[25]	福州市生态环境局. 福州市生态环境损害赔偿制度改革实施方案 [EB/OL]. (2019-03-27) [2021-07-20]. http://www.fuzhou.gov.cn/zgfzzt/shbj/zz/hjzc/201903/t20190327_2790498.htm [Fuzhou Municipal Bureau of Ecology and Environment. Implementation Plan of Ecological and Environmental Damage Compensation System Reform in Fuzhou City [EB/OL]. (2019-03-27) [2021-07-20]. http://www.fuzhou.gov.cn/zgfzzt/shbj/zz/hjzc/201903/t20190327_2790498.htm]
[26]	福州市生态环境局. 福州市国家生态文明建设示范市规划(2018—2025年) [EB/OL]. (2020-04-01) [2021-07-20]. http://fuzhou.gov.cn/zgfzzt/shbj/zz/hjjg_31440/zrst/202004/t20200401_3235526.htm [Fuzhou Bureau of Ecology and Environment. Planning of Fuzhou National Ecological Civilization Construction Demonstration City (2018-2025) [EB/OL]. (2020-04-01) [2021-07-20]. http://fuzhou.gov.cn/zgfzzt/shbj/zz/hjjg_31440/zrst/202004/t20200401_3235526.htm]
[27]	福州市统计局. 2019年福州统计年鉴. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2019 [Fuzhou Bureau of Statistics. Fuzhou Statistical Yearbook in 2019. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2019]
[28]	福州市人民政府. 福州自然资源情况 [EB/OL]. (2020-07-09) [2021-08-20]. http://www.fuzhou.gov.cn/zgfzzt/zjrc/zrdl/ [Fuzhou Municipal People’s Gover-nment. Natural Resources of Fuzhou in 2018 [EB/OL]. (2020-07-09) [2021-08-20]. http://www.fuzhou.gov.cn/zgfzzt/zjrc/zrdl/]
[29]	欧阳志云, 王如松, 赵景柱. 生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值评价. 应用生态学报, 1999, 10(5): 635-640 [Ouyang Z-Y, Wang R-S, Zhao J-Z. Ecosystem services and their economic valuation. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 1999, 10(5): 635-640]
[30]	牛乐, 王娇月, 郗凤明, 等.福州市经济生态生产总值核算. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(11), doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.015 [Niu L, Wang J-Y, Xi F-M, et al. Gross economic-ecological product accounting of Fuzhou City, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(11), doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.015]
[31]	吴强, 张合平. 森林生态补偿研究进展. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(1): 226-233 [Wu Q, Zhang H-P. Research progress on compensation to ecological service of forests. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2016, 35(1): 226-233]
[32]	曾梦婷, 李志刚. 基于改进价值当量因子的北京市生态-经济协调度实证分析. 生态经济, 2021, 37(4): 163-169 [Zeng M-T, Li Z-G. An empirical analysis of eco-economic coordination degree in Beijing based on improved value equivalent factor. Ecological Economy, 2021, 37(4): 163-169]
[33]	史培军, 张淑英, 潘耀忠, 等. 生态资产与区域可持续发展. 北京师范大学学报: 社会科学版, 2005(2): 131-137 [Shi P-J, Zhang S-Y, Pan Y-Z, et al. Ecosystem capital and regional sustainable development. Journal of Beijing Normal University: Social Sciences, 2005(2): 131-137]
[34]	Fan M, Chen L. Spatial characteristics of land uses and eco-logical compensations based on payment for ecosystem services model from 2000 to 2015 in Sichuan Province, China. Ecological Informatics, 2019, 50: 162-183
[35]	Yang W, Gong Q, Zhang XY. Surplus or deficit? Quantifying the total ecological compensation of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30: 621-641
[36]	Fan M, Chen L, Wang Q. Assessing the high impacts of land use change: Spatial characteristics of land uses and ecological compensation based on payment for ecosystem services model in a mountainous area, China. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2019, 24: 1431-1460