Gross ecosystem product accounting of national park: Taking Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park as an example

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.010

Abstract

Abstract: Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park has the most representative and largest contiguous tropical rainforest in China, which has advantages in exploring the realization mechanism of ecological product value in national parks. Based on the basic framework of “The Technical Guideline on Gross Ecosystem Product (GEP)”, we constructed a GEP accounting system in line with the characteristics of tropical rain forest national park, and calculated the GEP of Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park in 2019. The results showed that the GEP of Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park in 2019 was 204.513 billion yuan, and the GEP per unit area was 0.046 billion yuan·km^-2. Among all the service types, the value of material services was 4.850 billion yuan, accounting for 2.4% of the total GEP in the national park. The ecosystem regulation service value was 168.891 billion yuan, accounting for 82.6%. The value of cultural services was 30.772 billion yuan, accounting for 15.0%. Among different ecosystem types, the unit area value of the tropical rain forest ecosystem represented by mountain rain forest, lowland rain forest, deciduous monsoon forest, and tropical cloud forest was much higher than that of plantation or other ecosystems, indicating the dominant role of tropical rain forest ecosystem in providing ecosystem services. In addition, based on the GEP accounting results of the national park, we put forward relevant suggestions for further exploring the realization path and realization mechanism of ecological product value.

Key words: tropical rainforest, national park, gross ecosystem product, ecological product value.

CHEN Zong-zhu, LEI Jin-rui, WU Ting-tian, CHEN De-xiang, ZHOU Zhang, LI Yuan-ling, HONG Xiao-jiang, YANG Zhong-yang, LI Yi-de. Gross ecosystem product accounting of national park: Taking Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park as an example[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(11): 3883-3892.

References 29

[1]	Young KR. National park protection in relation to the ecological zonation of a neighboring human community: An example from northern Peru. Mountain Research and Development, 1993, 13: 267-280
[2]	臧振华, 张多, 王楠, 等. 中国首批国家公园体制试点的经验与成效、问题与建议. 生态学报, 2020, 40(24): 8839-8850 [Zang Z-H, Zhang D, Wang N, et al. Experiences, achievement, problems and recommendations of the first batch of China’s national park system pilots. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(24): 8839-8850]
[3]	中共中央办公厅. 建立国家公园体制总体方案. 北京: 中共中央办公厅, 2017 [Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China. Overall Plan for Establishing National Park System. Beijing: Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, 2017]
[4]	中共中央办公厅. 关于建立以国家公园为主体的自然保护地体系的指导意见. 北京: 中共中央办公厅, 2019 [Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China. Guiding Opinions on the Establishment of National Park-based Nature Reserve System. Beijing: Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, 2019]
[5]	中共中央办公厅. 关于建立健全生态产品价值实现机制的意见. 北京: 中共中央办公厅, 2021 [Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, Office of the State Council. Opinions on Establishing and Perfecting the Value Realization Mechanism of Ecological Products. Beijing: Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, 2021]
[6]	秦昌波, 苏洁琼, 王倩, 等. “绿水青山就是金山银山”理论实践政策机制研究. 环境科学研究, 2018, 31(6): 985-990 [Qin C-B, Su J-Q, Wang Q, et al. Practice mechanism analysis of the theory of “lucid waters and lush mountains are invaluable assets”. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2018, 31(6): 985-990]
[7]	臧振华, 徐卫华, 欧阳志云. 国家公园体制试点区生态产品价值实现探索. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(3): 275-277 [Zang Z-H, Xu W-H, Ouyang Z-Y. Exploration on the value realization of ecological products in China’s national park system pilots. Biodiversity Science, 2021, 29(3): 275-277]
[8]	王斌. 生态产品价值实现的理论基础与一般途径. 太平洋学报, 2019, 27(10): 78-91 [Wang B. Theoretical foundations and general means for value realization of ecological products. Pacific Journal, 2019, 27(10): 78-91]
[9]	欧阳志云, 朱春全, 杨广斌, 等.生态系统生产总值核算: 概念、核算方法与案例研究.生态学报, 2013, 33(21): 6747-6761 [Ouyang Z-Y, Zhu C-Q, Yang G-B, et al. Gross ecosystem product: Concept, accounting framework and case study. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(21): 6747-6761]
[10]	杨渺, 肖燚, 欧阳志云, 等. 四川省生态系统生产总值(GEP)的调节服务价值核算. 西南民族大学学报: 自然科学版, 2019, 45(3): 221-232 [Yang M, Xiao Y, Ouyang Z-Y, et al. Ecosystem regulation services accounting of gross ecosystem product (GEP) in Sichuan Province. Journal of Southwest Minzu University: Natural Science, 2019, 45(3): 221-232]
[11]	宋昌素, 欧阳志云. 面向生态效益评估的生态系统生产总值GEP核算研究——以青海省为例. 生态学报, 2020, 40(10): 3207-3217 [Song C-S, Ouyang Z-Y. Gross ecosystem product accounting for ecological benefits assessment: A case study of Qinghai Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(10): 3207-3217]
[12]	欧阳志云, 林亦晴, 宋昌素. 生态系统生产总值(GEP)核算研究——以浙江省丽水市为例. 环境与可持续发展, 2020, 45(6): 80-85 [Ouyang Z-Y, Lin Y-Q, Song C-S. Research on Gross Ecosystem Product(GEP): Case study of Lishui City, Zhejiang Province. Environment and Sustainable Development, 2020, 45(6): 80-85]
[13]	范振林, 李维明. 生态产品价值实现机制研究——以贵州省为例. 河北地质大学学报, 2020, 43(3): 82-90 [Fan Z-L, Li W-M. Research on realization mechanism of ecological product value: A case study of Guizhou Province. Journal of Hebei GEO University, 2020, 43(3): 82-90]
[14]	王莉雁, 肖燚, 欧阳志云, 等. 国家级重点生态功能区县生态系统生产总值核算研究——以阿尔山市为例. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2017, 27(3): 146-154 [Wang L-Y, Xiao Y, Ouyang Z-Y, et al. Gross ecosystem product accounting in the national key ecological function area: An example of Arxan. China Population,Resources and Environment, 2017, 27(3): 146-154]
[15]	白玛卓嘎, 肖燚, 欧阳志云, 等. 基于生态系统生产总值核算的习水县生态保护成效评估. 生态学报, 2020, 40(2): 499-509 [Pema D, Xiao Y, Ouyang Z-Y, et al. Assessment of ecological conservation effect in Xishui County based on gross ecosystem product. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(2): 499-509]
[16]	梁龙妮, 王明旭, 李朝晖, 等. 珠三角地区经济生态生产总值核算及“两山”转化路径探讨. 环境污染与防治, 2021, 43(1): 121-125 [Liang L-N, Wang M-X, Li Z-H, et al. Calculation of gross economic-ecological product in Pearl River Delta region and the discussion on the transformation path from “lucid waters and lush mountains” to “invaluable assets”. Environmental Pollution & Control, 2021, 43(1): 121-125]
[17]	冯刚. 深圳: 全国首创“1+3”GEP核算制度体系. 环境, 2021, 4(6): 42-44 [Feng G. Shenzhen: China’s first “1+3” GEP accounting system. The Environment, 2021, 4(6): 42-44]
[18]	杨小波, 陈宗铸,李东海,等. 海南植被志. 北京: 科学出版社, 2018 [Yang X-B, Chen Z-Z, Li D-H, et al. Vegetation of Hainan. Beijing: Science Press, 2018]
[19]	中华人民共和国生态环境部. 陆地生态系统生产总值(GEP)核算技术指南. 北京: 中华人民共和国生态环境部, 2020 [Ministry of Ecological Environment of the People’s Republic of China. The Technical Guideline on Gross Ecosystem Product(GEP). Beijing: Mini-stry of Ecological Environment of the People’s Republic of China, 2020]
[20]	国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会. 森林生态系统服务功能评估规范 (GB/T 38582—2020) [EB/OL]. (2020-12-12) [2021-03-03]. https://max.book118.com/html/2020/0404/5210144-043002234.shtm [General Administration for National Market Supervision. National Standardization Committee. Specifications for Forest Ecosystem Services (GB/T 38582-2020) [EB/OL]. (2020-12-12) [2021-03-03]. https://max.book118.com/html/2020/0404/52101440-43002234.shtm]
[21]	马国霞, 赵学涛, 吴琼, 等. 生态系统生产总值核算概念界定和体系构建. 资源科学, 2015, 37(9):1709-1715 [Ma G-X, Zhao X-T, Wu Q, et al. Mea-suring gross ecosystem product (GEP) of 2015 for terrestrial ecosystems in China. Resources Science,2015, 37(9): 1709-1715]
[22]	欧阳芳, 王丽娜, 闫卓, 等. 中国农业生态系统昆虫授粉功能量与服务价值评估. 生态学报, 2019, 39(1): 131-145 [Ouyang F, Wang L-N, Yan Z, et al. Evaluation of insect pollination and service value in China’s agricultural ecosystems. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(1): 131-145]
[23]	国家林业局. 湿地生态系统服务评估规范 (LY/T 2899—2017). 北京: 国家林业局, 2017 [State Fore-stry Administration. Specifications for Assessment of Wetland Ecosystems Services (LY/T 2899-2017). Beijing: State Forestry Administration, 2017]
[24]	王金南, 於方, 马国霞, 等. 规范生态系统价值核算助力生态产品价值实现 [EB/OL]. (2020-10-12) [2021-03-03]. https://www.cenews.com.cn/opinion/202010/t20201012_959981.html [Wang J-N, Yu F, Ma G-X, et al. Standardizing Ecosystem Value Accounting Helps Realize the Value of Ecological Products [EB/OL]. (2020-10-12) [2021-03-03]. https://www.cenews.com.cn/opinion/202010/t20201012_959981.html]
[25]	高晓龙, 林亦晴, 徐卫华, 等.生态产品价值实现研究进展. 生态学报, 2020, 40(1): 24-33 [Gao X-L, Lin Y-Q, Xu W-H, et al. Research progress on the value realization of ecological products. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(1): 24-33]
[26]	卞文志. 用“价格标签”体现生态价值——深圳市盐田区首创“城市GEP”核算体系. 环境保护与循环经济, 2015, 35(3): 18-19 [Bian W-Z. Using “price tag” to reflect ecological value: The first “urban GEP” accounting system in Yantian District, Shenzhen. Environmental Protection and Circular Economy, 2015, 35(3): 18-19]
[27]	白玛卓嘎, 肖邁, 欧阳志云, 等. 甘孜藏族自治州生态系统生产总值核算研究. 生态学报, 2017, 37(19): 6302-6312 [Pema D, Xiao Y, Ouyang Z-Y, et al. Gross ecosystem product accounting for the Garzê Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(19): 6302-6312]
[28]	马国霞, 於方, 王金南, 等. 中国2015年陆地生态系统生产总值核算研究. 中国环境科学, 2017, 37(4): 1474-1482 [Ma G-X, Yu F, Wang J-N, et al. Measuring gross ecosystem product (GEP) of 2015 for terrestrial ecosystems in China. China Environmental Science, 2017, 37(4): 1474-1482]
[29]	白杨, 李晖, 王晓媛, 等. 云南省生态资产与生态系统生产总值核算体系研究. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(7): 1100-1112 [Bai Y, Li H, Wang X-Y, et al. Evaluating natural resource assets and gross ecosystem products using ecological accounting system:A case study in Yunnan Province. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017, 32(7): 1100-1112]