Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 1721-1728.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202306.028
• Reviews • Previous Articles
GAO Qian, CHEN Guangyan, SUN Kaijie, JIN Taihua, WANG Zhennan, WEI Mingji*
Received:
2023-01-14
Accepted:
2023-03-09
Online:
2023-06-15
Published:
2023-12-15
GAO Qian, CHEN Guangyan, SUN Kaijie, JIN Taihua, WANG Zhennan, WEI Mingji. Effects of “audience effects”on animal mate choice: A review[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(6): 1721-1728.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.cjae.net/EN/10.13287/j.1001-9332.202306.028
[1] Edward DA, Chapman T. The evolution and significance of male mate choice. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 2011, 26: 647-654 [2] McGregor PK, Peake TM. Communication networks: Social environments for receiving and signalling beha-viour. Acta Ethologica, 2000, 2: 71-81 [3] Brown C, Laland KN. Social learning in fishes: A review. Fish and Fisheries, 2003, 4: 280-288 [4] Valone TJ. From eavesdropping on performance to copying the behavior of others: A review of public information use. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2007, 62: 1-14 [5] Oliveira RF, McGregor PK, Latruffe C. Know thine enemy: Fighting fish gather information from observing conspecific interactions. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 1998, 265: 1045-1049 [6] Doutrelant C, McGregor PK, Oliveira RF. The effect of an audience on intra-sexual communication in male Siamese fighting fish, Betta splendens. Behavioral Ecology, 2001, 12: 283-286 [7] McGregor PK. Signalling in territorial systems: A context for individual identification, ranging and eavesdropping. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 1993, 340: 237-244 [8] Marler P, Dufty A, Pickert R. Vocal communication in the domestic chicken: II. Is a sender sensitive to the presence and nature of a receiver? Animal Behaviour, 1986, 34: 194-198 [9] Fisher HS, Rosenthal GG. Male swordtails court with an audience in mind. Biology Letters, 2007, 3: 5-7 [10] Berglund A, Bisazz A, Pilastro A. Armaments and ornaments: An evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1996, 58: 385-399 [11] Kim D, Aspbury AS, Zúñiga-Vega JJ, et al. Smaller rival males do not affect male mate choice or cortisol but do affect 11-ketotestosterone in a unisexual-bisexual mating complex of fish. Behavioural Processes, 2019, 167: 103916 [12] De Simone GA, Pompilio L, Manrique G. The effects of a male audience on male and female mating behaviour in the blood-sucking bug Rhodnius prolixus. Neotropical Entomology, 2022, 51: 212-220 [13] Ung D, Amy M, Leboucher G. Heaven it’s my wife! Male canaries conceal extra-pair courtships but increase aggressions when their mate watches. PLoS One, 2011, 6(8): e22686 [14] Plath M, Blum D, Schlupp I, et al. Audience effect alters mating preferences in a livebearing fish, the Atlantic molly, Poecilia mexicana. Animal Behaviour, 2008, 75: 21-29 [15] Auld HL, Godin JGJ. Sexual voyeurs and copiers: Social copying and the audience effect on male mate choice in the guppy. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2015, 69: 1795-1807 [16] Matessi G, McGregor PK, Peake TM, et al. Do male birds intercept and use rival courtship calls to adjust paternity protection behaviours? Behaviour, 2005, 142: 507-524 [17] Lappan S, Morino L. Mating in the presence of a competitor: Audience effects may promote male social tolerance in polyandrous siamang (Symphalangus syndactylus) groups. Behaviour, 2014, 151: 1067-1089 [18] Heubel K. Female mating competition alters female mating preferences in common gobies. Current Zoology, 2018, 64: 351-361 [19] Nöbel S, Witte K. Public information influences sperm transfer to females in sailfin molly males. PLoS One, 2013, 8(1): e53865 [20] Mautz BS, Jennions MD. The effect of competitor presence and relative competitive ability on male mate choice. Behavioral Ecology, 2011, 22: 769-775 [21] Wong BBM, Mccarthy M. Prudent male mate choice under perceived sperm competition risk in the eastern mosquito fish. Behavioral Ecology, 2009, 20: 278-282 [22] Callander S, Kahn AT, Hunt J, et al. The effect of competitors on calling effort and life span in male field crickets. Behavioral Ecology, 2013, 24: 1251-1259 [23] Dzieweczynski TL, Lyman S, Poor EA. Male Siamese fighting fish, Betta splendens, increase rather than conceal courtship behavior when a rival is present. Ethology, 2009, 115: 186-195 [24] 陈博, 文乐雷, 赵菊鹏, 等.同种雄性竞争对手的存在对星豹蛛雄蛛求偶和交配行为的影响. 生态学报, 2017, 37(11): 3932-3938 [25] Xiao R, Chen B, Wang YC, et al. Silk-mediated male courtship effort in the monandrous wolf spider Pardosa astrigera (Araneae: Lycosidae). Chemoecology, 2015, 25: 285-292 [26] Loupre P, Muller K, Bettencourt-Amarante S, et al. Sexual audience affects male’s reproduction investment without consequences on reproductive outputs. Insect Science, 2022, 29: 1170-1180 [27] Bretman A, Westmancoat JD, Gage MJG, et al. Individual plastic responses by males to rivals reveal mismatches between behaviour and fitness outcomes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2012, 279: 2868-2876 [28] Bretman A, Rouse J, Westmancoat JD, et al. The role of species-specific sensory cues in male responses to mating rivals in Drosophila melanogaster fruitflies. Ecology and Evolution, 2017, 7: 9247-9256 [29] Rouse J, Bretman A. Exposure time to rivals and sensory cues affect how quickly males respond to changes in sperm competition threat. Animal Behaviour, 2016, 122: 1-8 [30] Muller K, Thiéry D, Motreui S, et al. What makes a good mate? Factors influencing male and female reproductive success in a polyphagous moth. Animal Behaviour, 2016, 120: 31-39 [31] Gross MR. Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: Diversity within sexes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 1996, 11: 92-98 [32] Schlupp I, Ryan MJ. Male Sailfin mollies (Poecilia latipinna) copy the mate choice of other males. Beha-vioral Ecology, 1997, 8: 104-107 [33] Jeswiet SB, Lee-Jenkins SSY, Ramnarine IW, et al. Sperm competition risk and mate choice in male Trinidadian guppies, Poecilia reticulata. Animal Behaviour, 2011, 81: 639-644 [34] Padur L, Wedekind J, Öztürk Ö, et al. Do audience effects lead to relaxed male sexual harassment? Beha-viour, 2009, 146: 1739-1758 [35] Dosen LD, Montgomerie R. Mate preferences by male guppies (Poecilia reticulata) in relation to the risk of sperm competition. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2003, 55: 266-271 [36] Ribowski A, Franck D. Demonstration of strength and concealment of weakness in escalating fights of male swordtails (Xiphophorus helleri). Ethology, 1993, 93: 265-274 [37] 尚玉昌. 动物行为研究的新进展(六): 性选择和配偶选择. 自然杂志, 2013, 35(3): 207-210 [38] 张建军, 张知彬. 动物的性选择. 生态学杂志, 2003, 22(4): 60-64 [39] 张宪德, 徐婷婷, 赵婷婷, 等.配偶选择中“听众效应”及鸣唱对雌性灰文鸟行为的影响. 生态学报, 2016, 36(16): 5247-5255 [40] Overduin-de Vries AM, Olesen CU, de Vries H, et al. Sneak copulations in long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis): No evidence for tactical deception. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2013, 67: 101-111 [41] Domínguez-Castanedo O. Perceived mate competition risk influences the female mate choice and increases the reproductive effort in the annual killifish Millerichthys robustus. Ethology Ecology and Evolution, 2022, 34: 107-119 [42] Kniel N, Bender S, Witte K. Sex-specific audience effect in the context of mate choice in zebra finches. PLoS One, 2016, 11(2): e0147130 [43] Swaddle JP, Cathey MG, Correll M, et al. Socially transmitted mate preferences in a monogamous bird: A non-genetic mechanism of sexual selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2005, 272: 1053-1058 [44] Kniel N, Dürler C, Hecht I, et al. Novel mate preference through mate-choice copying in zebra finches: Sexes differ. Behavioral Ecology, 2015, 26: 647-655 [45] Witte K, Kniel N, Kureck IM. Mate-choice copying: Status quo and where to go. Current Zoology, 2015, 61: 1073-1081 [46] Castellano S, Friard O, Pilastro A. The audience effect and the role of deception in the expression of male mating preferences. Animal Behaviour, 2016, 115: 273-282 [47] Gibson RM, Bachman GC. The costs of female choice in a lekking bird. Behavioral Ecology, 1992, 3: 300-309 [48] Pocklington R, Dill LM. Predation on females or males: Who pays for bright male traits? Animal Behaviour, 1995, 49: 1122-1124 [49] Atwell A, Jr Wagner WE. Female mate choice plasticity is affected by the interaction between male density and female age in a field cricket. Animal Behaviour, 2014, 98: 177-183 [50] Agrawal A. The evolutionary consequences of mate copying on male traits. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2002, 51: 33-40 [51] Wade MJ, Pruett-Jones SG. Female copying increases the variance in male mating success. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1990, 87: 5749-5753 [52] 陈琳, 王广利, 魏洪义. 杨小舟蛾的羽化和生殖行为节律. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(8): 2425-2430 [53] De Simone GA, Manrique G, Pompilio L. Females’ sequential mating decisions depend on both the quality of the potential mates in a blood-sucking bug. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2018, 72: 1-9 [54] 王焱, 王桂平, 穆兰芳, 等. 樟巢螟成虫的求偶及交配行为. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(11): 2768-2772 [55] 舒金平, 滕莹, 张爱良, 等. 竹笋基夜蛾的求偶及交配行为. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(12): 3421-3428 [56] Aquiloni L, Burîc M, Gherardi F. Crayfish females eavesdrop on fighting males before choosing the dominant mate. Current Biology, 2008, 18: R462-R463 [57] Ophir A, Galef BG. Female Japanese quail that ‘eavesdrop’ on fighting males prefer losers to winners. Animal Behaviour, 2003, 66: 399-407 [58] Price AC, Rodd FH. The effect of social environment on male-male competition in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Ethology, 2006, 112: 22-32 [59] Kodric-Brown A. Female choice of multiple male criteria in guppies: Interacting effects of dominance, coloration and courtship. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 1993, 32: 415-420 [60] Tachon G, Murray AM, Gray DA, et al. Agonistic displays and the benefits of fighting in the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. Journal of Insect Behavior, 1999, 12: 533-543 [61] Dzieweczynski TL, Gill CE, Perazio CE. Opponent familiarity influences the audience effect in male-male interactions in Siamese fighting fish. Animal Behaviour, 2012, 83: 1219-1224 [62] 熊成培, 王歧山. 短尾猴和日本猴雄性性行为的比较研究. 兽类学报, 1991, 11(1): 13-22 [63] Lindsay DR, Dunsmore DG, Williams JD, et al. Audience effects on the mating behaviour of rams. Animal Behaviour, 1976, 24: 818-821 [64] Townsend SW, Deschner T, Zuberbühler K. Female chimpanzees use copulation calls flexibly to prevent social competition. PLoS One, 2008, 3(6): e2431 [65] Overduin-de Vries AM, Massen JJM, Spruijt BM, et al. Sneaky monkeys: An audience effect of male rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) on sexual behavior. American Journal of Primatology, 2012, 74: 217-228 [66] López H, Orihuela A, Silva E. Effect of the presence of a dominant bull on performance of two age group bulls in libido tests. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 1999, 65: 13-20 [67] Bierbach D, Girndt A, Hamfler S, et al. Male fish use prior knowledge about rivals to adjust their mate choice. Biology Letters, 2011, 7: 349-351 [68] Vitta ACR, Lorenzo MG. Copulation and mate guarding behavior in Triatoma brasiliensis (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). Journal of Medical Entomology, 2009, 46: 789-795 [69] Vázquez R, Orihuela A, Aguirre V. Effect of dominance-subordinate relationship and familiarity of an audience male, in young rams’ libido and semen characteristics. Journal of Veterinary Behavior Clinical Applications and Research, 2012, 7: 80-83 [70] Ziege M, Mahlow K, Hennige-Sulz C, et al. Audience effects in the Atlantic molly (Poecilia mexicana) -prudent male mate choice in response to perceived sperm competition risk? Frontiers in Zoology, 2009, 6: 17 [71] Bretman A, Fricke C, Chapman T. Plastic responses of male Drosophila melanogaster to the level of sperm competition increase male reproductive fitness. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2009, 276: 1705-1711 [72] Wronski T, Bierbach D, Czupalla LM, et al. Rival presence leads to reversible changes in male mate choice of a desert dwelling ungulate. Behavioral Ecology, 2012, 23: 551-558 [73] 曾令清, 付成, 奚露, 等. 鳊幼鱼能量代谢和个性行为的个体变异及表型关联. 生态学报, 2017, 37(14) : 4807-4816 [74] Auld HL, Ramnarine IW, Godin JGJ. Male mate choice in the Trinidadian guppy is influenced by the phenotype of audience sexual rivals. Behavioral Ecology, 2017, 28: 362-372 [75] Bierbach D, Sommer-Trembo C, Hanisch J, et al. Personality affects mate choice: Bolder males show stronger audience effects under high competition. Behavioral Ecology, 2015, 26: 1314-1325 [76] Auld HL, Jeswiet SB, Godin JGJ. Do male Trinidadian guppies adjust their alternative mating tactics in the presence of a rival male audience? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2015, 69: 1191-1199 [77] Witte K, Baumgärtner K, Röhrig C, et al. Test of the deception hypothesis in Atlantic mollies Poecilia mexicana: Does the audience copy a pretended mate choice of others? Biology, 2018, 7: 40 [78] Dubois F. When being the centre of the attention is detrimental: Copiers may favour the use of evasive tactics. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2015, 69: 183-191 [79] Desjardins JK, Klausner JQ, Fernald RD. Female genomic response to mate information. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010, 107: 21176-21180 [80] Rouse J, Watkinson K, Bretman A. Flexible memory controls sperm competition responses in male Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2018, 285: 1-6 [81] Plath M, Kromuszczynski K, Tiedemann R. Audience effect alters male but not female mating preferences. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2009, 63: 381-390 |
[1] | QIAN Guixia, WANG Xiaoxin, LI Wu, ZHANG Qianni. Evolution and implementation pathways from desertification prevention and control to sandy land management and use in China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2024, 35(1): 8-16. |
[2] | QIU Kerui, LI Jinggong, LIU Wen, WANG Xiaoping. Research progress on the measurement of insect sensitive wavelength [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(5): 1430-1440. |
[3] | HAN Chengquan, WANG Hui, WANG Jianwei, LI Fukuan, WANG Zhennan, HU Xiyi, YANG Yan, LYU Shenjin. Research progress on the interference effects of plasticizers on maternal behavior and its potential mechanisms. [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(11): 3157-3168. |
[4] | KUI Guoxian, SHI Changqing, YANG Jianying, LI Ruipeng, WEI Guangkuo, LIU Jiaqi. Spatial-temporal variations of vegetation coverage and its driving force in Inner Mongolia grassland, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(10): 2713-2722. |
[5] | SHENG Fei, LIU Shi-yu, ZHANG Ting, YU Min-qi. Runoff effect of precipitation variation and landscape pattern evolution in Lianshui watershed, Jiangxi, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(1): 196-202. |
[6] | LI Zhe, ZHANG Qi, WU Qing-ming, GAO Xiao-dong, Ngo Thi Kieu Trang, XU Zhuo. Behavioral response pattern of Aythya baeri under different weather conditions during wintering [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(9): 2557-2562. |
[7] | WANG Yue, ZENG Xian. Governance mechanisms of industrial carbon emissions in heavy industrial zones under environmental justice based on evolutionary game perspective [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(12): 3195-3204. |
[8] | LIU Hui, SONG Xiao-yu, JIA Qiong, ZHU De-ming. Quantification on driving forces for spatiotemporal evolution of precipitation-use efficiency of grassland across recent two decades in Otog Banner, Inner Mongolia, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(12): 3253-3262. |
[9] | NAN Sheng-xiang, WEI Wei, LIU Chun-fang, ZHOU Jun-ju. Eco-environmental effects and spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of land use change: A case study of Hexi Corridor, Northwest China. [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(11): 3055-3064. |
[10] | DENG Yuan-jie, HOU Meng-yang, JIA Lei, WANG Ya-qin, ZHANG Xiao, YAO Shun-bo. Ecological compensation strategy of the old revolutionary base areas along the route of Long March based on ecosystem service value evaluation [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(1): 159-168. |
[11] | CAO Nai-gang, ZHAO Lin, GAO Xiao-tong. Spatio-temporal evolution and driving mechanism of green economic efficiency at county level in the Yellow River Delta, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(9): 3299-3310. |
[12] | WANG Qian, ZHAO Xiao-qing, PU Jun-wei, YUE Qi-fa, CHEN Xing-yu, SHI Xiao-qian. Spatial-temporal variations and influencing factors of eco-environment vulnerability in the karst region of Southeast Yunnan, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(6): 2180-2190. |
[13] | LI Sha, LIU Xue-qing, JIANG Wei, XIAO Kan, HUANG An-yang, ZHANG Qi. Application of environmental DNA technology in natural reproduction of the four major Chinese carps in Yichang section of Yangtzi River, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(6): 2241-2248. |
[14] | SHANG Guang-yin, YANG Xin. Impacts of policy cognition on low-carbon agricultural technology adoption of farmers. [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(4): 1373-1382. |
[15] | LUO Qing-hua, FU Lei, JIANG Wan-sheng, ZHOU Li-qing, CAO Wei, TIAN He, CHEN Rong-gui. Effects of water quality on the reproductive behavior and capacity of Andrias davidianus under tourism disturbance. [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(4): 1471-1478. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||