Welcome to Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology! Today is Share:

Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology ›› 2012, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (09): 2411-2421.

• Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Impact of fire on carbon dynamics of Larix gmelinii forest in Daxing’an Mountains of Northeast China: A simulation with CENTURY model.

FANG Dong-ming1,2, ZHOU Guang-sheng1, JIANG Yan-ling1, JIA Bing-rui1, XU Zhen-zhu1, SUI Xing-hua1,2   

  1. (1Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China; 2Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
  • Online:2012-09-18 Published:2012-09-18

Abstract: Fire is one of the important natural disturbances to forest ecosystem, giving strong impact on the ecosystem carbon dynamics. By using CENTURY model, this paper simulated the responses of the carbon budget of Larix gmelinii forest in Huzhong area of Daxing’an Mountains to different intensities of fire. The results indicated that after the fires happened, the soil total carbon pool of the forest had a slight increase in the first few years and then recovered gradually, while the stand biomass carbon pool increased after an initial decrease, with the recovery rate of carbon pool  of the stand fine components  being faster than that of the coarse components. The fluctuation of the carbon pools increased with the increase of fire intensity. After the fires, both the net primary productivity (NPP) of forest vegetation and the soil heterotrophic respiration increased after an initial decrease, but the recovery rate of the NPP was faster than that of soil heterotrophic respiration, resulting in the alternation of the stand functioned as a carbon source or sink. After light fire, the forest still functioned as a weak carbon sink, and quickly recovered as a carbon sink to the level before the fire happened. After other intensities fire, the forest functioned as a carbon source within 9-12 years, and then turned back to a carbon sink again. It was suggested that lower intensity forest fire could promote the regeneration of L. gmelinii forest, reduce the combustibles, and have no strong impact on the stand carbon budget, while higher intensity forest fire would lead to the serious loss of soil and tree carbon sequestration, retard the recovery of the forest, and thereby, the forest would be a carbon source in a longer term.