[1] |
Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R, et al. Sustainability science. Science, 2001, 292: 641-642
|
[2] |
Brocklesby M, Fisher E. Community development in sustainable livelihoods approaches: An introduction. Community Development Journal, 2003, 38: 185-198
|
[3] |
Shrestha UB, Dhital KR. Economic dependence of mountain communities on Chinese caterpillar fungus Ophiocordyceps sinensis (yarsagumba): A case from western Nepal. Oryx, 2017, 53: 256-264
|
[4] |
Angelsen A, Jagger P, Babigumira R, et al. Environmental income and rural livelihoods: A global-comparative analysis. World Development, 2014, 64: 12-28
|
[5] |
Ali A, Rahut DB. Forest-based livelihoods, income and poverty: Empirical evidence from the Himalayan region of rural Pakistan. Journal of Rural Studies, 2018, 57: 44-54
|
[6] |
Nguyen TT, Do TL, Bühler D, et al. Rural livelihoods and environmental resource dependence in Cambodia. Ecological Economics, 2015, 120: 282-295
|
[7] |
Cordova JPP, Wunder S, Smith HC, et al. Rural Income and forest reliance in Highland Guatemala. Environmental Management, 2013, 51: 1034-1043
|
[8] |
Nakakaawa C, Moll R, Vedeld P, et al. Collaborative resource management and rural livelihoods around protected areas: A case study of Mount Elgon National Park, Uganda. Forest Policy and Economics, 2015, 57: 1-11
|
[9] |
Nguyen TT, Do TL, Grote U. Natural resource extraction and household welfare in rural Laos. Land Degradation and Development, 2018, 29: 1-10
|
[10] |
Brobbey LK, Hansen CP, Kyereh B, et al. The econo-mic importance of charcoal to rural livelihoods: Evidence from a key charcoal-producing area in Ghana. Forest Policy and Economics, 2019, 101: 19-31
|
[11] |
Walelign SZ, Jiao X. Dynamics of rural livelihoods and environmental reliance: Empirical evidence from Nepal. Forest Policy and Economics, 2017, 83: 199-209
|
[12] |
Zenteno M, Zuidema PA, Jong WD, et al. Livelihood strategies and forest dependence: New insights from Bolivian forest communities. Forest Policy and Economics, 2013, 26: 12-21
|
[13] |
Narain U, Gupta S, Veld KV. Poverty and resource dependence in rural India. Ecological Economics, 2008, 66: 161-176
|
[14] |
Kemkes RJ. The role of natural capital in sustaining livelihoods in remote mountainous regions: The case of Upper Svaneti, Republic of Georgia. Ecological Economics, 2015, 117: 22-31
|
[15] |
王会, 赵亚文, 温亚利. 基于要素报酬的农户自然资源依赖度评价研究: 以云南省六个自然保护区为例. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2017, 27(12): 146-156 [Wang H, Zhao Y-W, Wen Y-L. Evaluation on the dependence of rural households on the natural resources based on factor returns: A case study on six natural reserves in Yunnan Province. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2017, 27(12): 146-156]
|
[16] |
李诗瑶, 蔡银莺. 农户家庭农地依赖度测算及多维生存状态评价: 以湖北省武汉市和孝感市为例. 中国土地科学,2018, 32(11): 37-43 [Li S-Y, Cai Y-Y. Farmland dependence measurement and multidimensional living status evaluation of rural households: A case study of Wuhan City and Xiaogan City in Hubei Province. China Land Science, 2018, 32(11): 37-43]
|
[17] |
段伟, 赵正, 刘梦婕, 等. 保护区周边农户自然资源依赖度研究. 农业技术经济, 2016(3): 93-102 [Duan W, Zhao Z, Liu M-J, et al. Study on the depen-dence of farmers on natural resources around protected areas. Journal of Agrotechnical Economic, 2016(3): 93-102]
|
[18] |
李聪, 康博纬, 李萍, 等. 易地移民搬迁对农户生态系统服务依赖度的影响. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2017, 27(11): 115-123 [Li C, Kang B-W, Li P, et al. Impacts of relocation and settlement program on rural households’ dependence on ecosystem. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2017, 27(11): 115-123]
|
[19] |
赵雪雁, 薛冰. 高寒生态脆弱区农户对气候变化的感知与适应意向: 以甘南高原为例. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(7): 2329-2339 [Zhao X-Y, Xue B. Far-mer’s perception and adaptation intention for climate change in high cold eco fragile region: A case of Gannan Plateau, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(7): 2329-2339]
|
[20] |
田媛, 许月卿, 郭洪峰, 等. 基于多分类Logistic回归模型的张家口市农用地格局模拟. 资源科学, 2012, 34(8): 893-905 [Tian Y, Xu Y-Q, Guo H-F, et al. Simulation of farmland use pattern in Zhangjiakou based on multinomial Logistic regression model. Resources Science, 2012, 34(8): 893-905]
|
[21] |
甘南藏族自治州统计局. 甘南统计年鉴. 兰州: 甘肃鑫统印务有限责任公司, 2017 [Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture Statistics Bureau. Gannan Statistical Yearbook. Lanzhou: Gansu Xintong Printing Limi-ted Company, 2017]
|
[22] |
杨文, 孙蚌珠, 王学龙. 中国农村家庭脆弱性的测量与分解. 经济研究, 2012(4): 40-51 [Yang W, Sun B-Z, Wang X-L. Measurement and decomposition of household’s vulnerability in rural China. Economic Research Journal, 2012(4): 40-51]
|
[23] |
张钦, 赵雪雁, 雒丽, 等. 高寒生态脆弱区气候变化对农户生计的脆弱性影响评价: 以甘南高原为例. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(3): 781-790 [Zhang Q, Zhao X-Y, Luo L, et al. Assessment of the impact of climate change on vulnerability of farmer households’ livelihood in an ecologically vulnerable alpine region: Taking Gannan Plateau for example. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2016, 35(3): 781-790]
|
[24] |
王一超, 郝海广, 张惠远, 等. 农牧交错区农户生计分化及其对耕地利用的影响: 以宁夏盐池县为例. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(2): 302-312 [Wang Y-C, Hao H-G, Zhang H-Y, et al. Livelihood diversification of farm household and its impact on the utilization of cultivated land in agro-pastoral area: A case study of Yanchi County, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. Journal of Natural Resources, 2018, 33(2): 302-312]
|
[25] |
赵雪雁. 不同生计方式农户的环境影响: 以甘南高原为例. 地理科学, 2013, 33(5): 545-552 [Zhao X-Y. Environmental impact of different livelihood strategies of farmers: A case of the Gannan Plateau. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2013, 33(5): 545-552]
|
[26] |
汤茜, 冯舒, 梁国付, 等. 高集约化农业景观中不同利益相关者的景观偏好. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(8): 2633-2640 [Tang Q, Feng S, Liang G-F, et al. Landscape preference of different stakeholders in highly intensive farming agricultural landscape. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(8): 2633-2640]
|
[27] |
徐建英, 孔明, 刘新新, 等. 生计资本对农户再参与退耕还林意愿的影响: 以卧龙自然保护区为例. 生态学报, 2017, 37(18): 6205-6215 [Xu J-Y, Kong M, Liu X-X, et al. The effect of livelihood capital on the willingness of farmers to re-enroll in the Grain for Green Program: A case study in Wolong Nature Reserve. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(18): 6205-6215]
|
[28] |
齐文平, 王艳慧, 赵文吉, 等. 虑及生态环境的十四片区贫困县多维贫困度量.应用生态学报, 2018, 29(11): 3670-3772 [Qi W-P, Wang Y-H, Zhao W-J, et al. Multidimensional poverty measurement of poverty stricken counties in China’s 14 contiguous destitute areas considering ecological environment. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(11): 3760-3772]
|