Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (8): 3010-3022.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202108.020
• Reviews • Previous Articles Next Articles
TIAN Bei-chen*, LI Pei-quan, HUANG Qian-du
Received:
2021-02-19
Accepted:
2021-05-31
Online:
2021-08-15
Published:
2022-02-15
Contact:
*E-mail: btianGeo@163.com
Supported by:
TIAN Bei-chen, LI Pei-quan, HUANG Qian-du. Construction methods of urban ecological corridor for birds: A review[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(8): 3010-3022.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.cjae.net/EN/10.13287/j.1001-9332.202108.020
[1] Beier P, Noss RF. Do habitat corridors provide connectivity? Conservation Biology, 1998, 12: 1241-1252 [2] Strohbach MW, Haase D, Kabisch N. Birds and the city: Urban biodiversity, land use, and socioeconomics. Ecology and Society, 2009, 14, doi: 10.5751/ES-03141-140231 [3] Nor ANM, Corstanje R, Harris JA, et al. Ecological connectivity networks in rapidly expanding cities. Heli-yon, 2017, 3: e00325 [4] De Montis A, Caschili S, Mulas M, et al. Urban-rural ecological networks for landscape planning. Land Use Policy, 2016, 50: 312-327 [5] De Torre R, Jiménez MD, Ramírez Á, et al. Use of restoration plantings to enchance bird seed dispersal at the roadside: Failures and prospects. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, 2015, 23: 302-311 [6] Heleno RH, Ross G, Everard A, et al. The role of avian “seed predators” as seed dispersers. Ibis, 2011, 153: 199-203 [7] Farmer MC, Wallace MC, Shiroya M. Bird diversity indicates ecological value in urban home prices. Urban Ecosystems, 2013, 16: 131-144 [8] Barth BJ, Gibbon SIF, Wilson RS. New urban developments that retain more remnant trees have greater bird diversity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2015, 136: 122-129 [9] Pollack L, Ondrasek NR, Calisi R. Urban health and ecology: The promise of an avian biomonitoring tool. Current Zoology, 2017, 63: 205-212 [10] Hedblom M, Heyman E, Antonsson H, et al. Bird song diversity influences young people’s appreciation of urban landscapes. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2014, 13: 469-474 [11] Beatley T, Newman P. Biophilic cities are sustainable, resilient cities. Sustainanility, 2013, 5: 3328-3345 [12] Geoffrey G. Outdoor recreation, health, and wellness: Understanding and enhancing the relationship. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2009, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1408694 [13] Curtin S. Wildlife tourism: The intangible, psychological benefits of human-wildlife encounters. Current Issues in Tourism, 2009, 12: 451-474 [14] Mudd DR. Touchet River Study: Part 1. Olympia, WA, USA: Washington Department of Fish and Game, 1975 [15] Galli A, Charles L, Forman R. Avian distribution patterns in forest islands of different sizes in Central New Jersey. The Auk, 1976, 93: 356-364 [16] Stauffer F, Best LB. Habitat selection by birds of ripa-rian communities: Evaluating effects of habitat alterations. Journal of Wildlife Management, 1980, 44: 1-15 [17] Soule ME, Bolger DT, Alberts AC, et al. Reconstructed dynamics of rapid extinctions of chaparral: Requiring birds in urban habitat islands. Conservation Biology, 1988, 2: 75-92 [18] Simberloff D, Cox J. Consequences and costs of conservation corridors. Conservation Biology, 1987, 1: 63-71 [19] McIntyre NE. Effects of forest patch size on avian diversity. Landscape Ecology, 1995, 10: 85-99 [20] Hawrot RY, Niemi GJ. Effects of edge type, patch shape, and patch size on avian communities in a mixed conifer-northern hardwood forest. The Auk, 1996, 113: 586-598 [21] Burke DM, Nol E. Influence of food abundance, nest-site habitat, and forest fragmentation on breeding Ovenbirds. The Auk, 1998, 115: 96-104 [22] Hinsley SA, Bellamy PE, Enoksson B, et al. Geogra-phical and land-use influences on bird species richness in small woods in agricultural landscapes. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters, 1998, 7: 125-135 [23] Weinberg HJ, Roth R. Forest area and habitat quality for nesting wood thrushes. The Auk, 1998, 115: 879-889 [24] Kilgo JC, Miller KV, Smith WP. Effects of group-selection timber harvest in bottomland hardwoods on fall migrant birds. Journal of Field Ornithology, 1999, 70: 404-413 [25] Desrochers A, Hannon SJ. Gap crossing decisions by forest songbirds during the post-fledging period. Conservation Biology, 1997, 11: 1204-1210 [26] Rail JF, Darveau M, Desrochers A, et al. Territorial responses of boreal forest birds to habitat gaps. The Condor, 1997, 99: 976-980 [27] St Clair CC, Bélisle M, Desrochers A, et al. Winter responses of forest birds to habitat corridors and gaps. Conservation Ecology, 1998, 2, doi: 10.5751/es-00068-020213 [28] Grubb TC, Doherty PF. On home-range gap-crossing. The Auk, 1999, 116: 618-628 [29] Cantwell MD, Forman RTT. Landscape graphs: Ecological modeling with graph theory to detect configurations common to diverse landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 1993, 8: 239-255 [30] Brooker L, Brooker M, Cale P. Animal dispersal in fragmented habitat: Measuring habitat connectivity, corridor use, and dispersal mortality. Conservation Ecology, 1999, 3: 1-22 [31] Bunn AG, Urban DL, Keitt TH. Landscape connectivity: A conservation application of graph theory. Journal of Environmental Management, 2000, 59: 265-278 [32] Adriaensen F, Chardon JP, De Blust G, et al. The application of ‘least-cost’ modelling as a functional landscape model. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2003, 64: 233-247 [33] McRae BH, Dickson BG, Keitt TH, et al. Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. Ecology, 2008, 89: 2712-2724 [34] Beier P, Majka D, Jenness J. Conceptual Steps for Designing Wildlife Corridors [EB/OL]. (2009-12-21) [2020-11-09]. http://corridordesign.org/dl/docs/ConceptualStepsForDesigningCorridors.pdf [35] 俞孔坚, 李迪华, 段铁武. 生物多样性保护的景观规划途径. 生物多样性, 1998, 6(3): 205-212 [Yu K-J, Li D-H, Duan T-W. Landscape approaches in biodiversity conservation. Chinese Biodiversity, 1998, 6(3): 205-212] [36] 朱强, 俞孔坚, 李迪华. 景观规划中的生态廊道宽度. 生态学报, 2005, 25(9): 2406-2412 [Zhu Q, Yu K-J, Li D-H. The width of ecological corridor in landscape planning. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, 25(9): 2406-2412] [37] Jim CY, Chen SS. Comprehensive greenspace planning based on landscape ecology principles in compact Nanjing City, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2003, 65: 95-116 [38] 黄晓凤. 白颈长尾雉活动区和栖息地研究. 博士论文. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2008 [Huang X-F. Study on Home Range and Habitat of Elliot’s Pheasant (Syrmaticus ellioti). PhD Thesis. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2008] [39] 吴昌广, 周志翔, 王鹏程, 等. 基于最小费用模型的景观连接度评价. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(8): 2042-2048 [Wu C-G, Zhou Z-X, Wang P-C, et al. Evaluation of landscape connectivity based on least cost model. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2009, 20(8): 2042-2048] [40] 富伟, 刘世梁, 崔保山, 等. 景观生态学中生态连接度研究进展. 生态学报, 2009, 29(11): 6174-6182 [Fu W, Liu S-L, Cui B-S, et al. A review on ecological connectivity in landscape ecology. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(11): 6174-6182] [41] Teng M, Wu C, Zhou Z, et al. Multipurpose greenway planning for changing cities: A framework integrating priorities and a least-cost path model. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2011, 103: 1-14 [42] 唐强, 闫红伟. 基于图论的大洼县西安镇水禽生境绿道网络规划. 广东农业科学, 2012(9): 158-161 [Tang Q, Yan H-W. Waterfowl habitat greenway network planning based on graph theory in Xi’an Town, Dawa County. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2012(9): 158-161] [43] 唐强, 范业展. 基于最小费用模型的辽河三角洲水禽生境绿道构建. 沈阳大学学报:自然科学版, 2013, 25(4): 266-270 [Tang Q, Fan Y-Z. Construction of waterfowl habitat corridors using least-cost distance mo-del in Liaohe River Delta. Journal of Shenyang University: Natural Science, 2013, 25(4): 266-270] [44] Tang Y, Gao C, Wu X. Urban ecological corridor network construction: An integration of the least cost path model and the invest model. International Journal of Geo-Information, 2020, 9, doi: 10.3390/ijgi9010033 [45] Liu Z, Huang Q, Tang G. Identification of urban flight corridors for migratory birds in the coastal regions of Shenzhen City based on three-dimensional landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 2020, 35, doi: 10.1007/s10980-020-01032-6 [46] 吴未, 张敏, 许丽萍, 等. 基于不同网络构建方法的生境网络优化研究——以苏锡常地区白鹭为例. 生态学报, 2016, 36(3): 844-853 [Wu W, Zhang M, Xu L-P, et al. Habitat network optimization based on different network building methods: A case study of Egretta garzetta in the Su-Xi-Chang area. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(3): 844-853] [47] 吴未, 胡余挺, 范诗薇, 等. 不同鸟类生境网络复合与优化——以苏锡常地区白鹭、鸳鸯、雉鸡为例. 生态学报, 2016, 36(15): 4832-4842 [Wu W, Hu Y-T, Fan S-W, et al. Recombination and optimization of bird habitat networks: A case study of the little egret (Egretta garzetta), mandarin duck (Aix galericulata) and ring-necked pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) in Su-Xi-Chang area. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(15): 4832-4842] [48] 陈涛, 覃事妮, 陈月华. 基于鸟类功能性连接度的林地网络评价——以长沙市宁乡县中心城区为例. 四川动物, 2017, 36(5): 489-497 [Chen T, Qin S-N, Chen Y-H. The assessment on woodland network based on functional connectivity of bird’s biological characte-ristics: A case study in Ningxiang County, Changsha. Sichuan Journal of Zoology, 2017, 36(5): 489-497] [49] Askins RA, Philbrick MJ, Sugeno DS. Relationship between the regional abundance of forest and the composition of forest bird communities. Biological Conservation, 1987, 39: 129-152 [50] Williams JC, Synder SA. Restoring habitat corridors in fragmented landscapes using optimization and percolation models. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 2005, 10: 239-250 [51] Mühlner S, Kormann U, Schmidt-Entling MH, et al. Structural versus functional habitat connectivity measures to explain bird diversity in fragmented orchards. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 2012, 3: 52-63 [52] Hong SH, Han BH, Choi SH, et al. Planning an ecological network using the predicted movement paths of urban birds. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 2013, 9: 165-174 [53] City of Richmond. Richmond’s Ecological Network Management Strategy [EB/OL]. (2015-08-09) [2020-11-05]. http://www.richmond.ca/_shared/assets/Ecological_Network_Management_Strategy42545.pdf [54] Ersoy E, Jorgensen A, Warren PH. Identifying multispecies connectivity corridors and the spatial pattern of the landscape. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2019, 40: 308-322 [55] 陈水华, 丁平, 范忠勇, 等. 城市鸟类对斑块状园林栖息地的选择性. 动物学研究, 2002, 23(1): 31-38 [Chen S-H, Ding P, Fan Z-Y, et al. Selectivity of birds to urban woodlots. Zoological Research, 2002, 23(1): 31-38] [56] 滕明君, 周志翔, 王鹏程, 等. 基于结构设计与管理的绿色廊道功能类型及其规划设计重点. 生态学报, 2010, 30(6):1604-1614 [Teng M-J, Zhou Z-X, Wang P-C, et al. The function of types of green corridor and the key issues in its planning based upon structral design and management. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(6): 1604-1614] [57] Xiu N, Ignatieva M, van den Bosch CK, et al. Applying a socio-ecological green network framework to Xi’an City, China. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11355-020-00412-z [58] Sepp K, Kaasik A. Development of National Ecological Networks in the Baltic Countries in the Framework of the Pan-European Ecological Network [EB/OL]. (2002-08-09) [2020-11-24]. https://portals.iucn.org/library/efiles/documents/eep-032.pdf [59] Bennett G, Mulongoy KJ. Review of Experience with Ecological Networks, Corridors and Buffer Zones [EB/OL]. (2006-03-01) [2020-11-05]. https://www.cbd.int/doc/publications/cbd-ts-23.pdf [60] Minor ES, Urban DL. A graph-theory framework for evaluating landscape connectivity and conservation planning. Conservaton Biology, 2008, 22: 297-307 [61] Albert R, Jeong H, Barabási AL. Error and attack tole-rance of complex networks. Nature, 2000, 406: 378-382 [62] Albert R, Barabási AL. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics, 2002, 74: 47-97 [63] Barabási AL, Bonabeau E. Scale-free networks. Scienti-fic American, 2003, 288: 60-69 [64] Urban D, Keitt T. Landscape connectivity: A graph-theo-retic perspective. Ecology, 2001, 82: 1205-1218 [65] 杨天翔, 张韦倩, 樊正球, 等. 基于鸟类边缘种行为的景观连接度研究——空间句法的反规划应用. 生态学报, 2013, 33(16): 5035-5046 [Yang T-X, Zhang W-Q, Fan Z-Q, et al. Exploring the space syntax under negative planning: A case study of landscape connectivity based on the behaviors of avian edge species. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(16): 5035-5046] [66] Shimazaki A, Yamaura Y, Senzaki M, et al. Urban permeability for birds: An approach combining mobbing-call experiments and circuit theory. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2016, 19: 167-175 [67] 刘吉平, 吕宪国, 杨青, 等. 三江平原东北部湿地生态安全格局设计. 生态学报, 2009, 29(3): 1083-1090 [Liu J-P, Lyu X-G, Yang Q, et al. Wetland landscape ecological security patterns analysis and plan in Northeast of Sanjiang Plain. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(3): 1083-1090] [68] 王原, 何成, 刘荣国, 等. 宁夏沙坡头国家自然保护区鸟类景观生态安全格局构建. 生态学报, 2017, 37(16): 5531-5541 [Wang Y, He C, Liu R-G, et al. Construction of the landscape ecological pattern for the conservation of birds at Shapotou National Nature Reserve, Ningxia. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(16): 5531-5541] [69] Wade AA, McKelvey KS, Schwartz MK. Resistance-surface-based Wildlife Conservation Connectivity Modeling: Summary of Efforts in the United States and Guide for Practitioners [EB/OL]. (2015-06-20) [2020-11-11]. https://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs/rmrs_gtr333.pdf [70] Chardon JP, Adriaensen F, Matthysen E. Incorporating landscape elements into a connectivity measure: A case study for the speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria L.). Landscape Ecology, 2003, 18: 561-573 [71] McRae BH, Beier P. Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007, 50: 19885-19890 [72] Keeley ATH, Beier P, Keeley BW, et al. Habitat suitability is a poor proxy for landscape connectivity during dispersal and mating movements. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2017, 161: 90-102 [73] Blazquez-Cabrera S, Gastón A, Beier P, et al. Influence of separating home range and dispersal movements on characterizing corridors and effective distances. Landscape Ecology, 2016, 31: 2355-2366 [74] Beier P, Majka DR, Newell SL. Uncertainty analysis of least-cost modeling for designing wildlife linkages. Ecological Application, 2009, 19: 2067-2077 [75] McRae B, Shah V, Edelman A. Circuitscape: Modeling Landscape Connectivity to Promote Conservation and Human Health [EB/OL]. (2016-05-09) [2020-11-27]. https://circuitscape.org/pubs/circuitscape_whitepaper.pdf [76] Dickson BG, Albano CM, Anantharaman R, et al. Circuit-theory applications to connectivity science and conservation. Conservation Biology, 2018, 33: 239-249 [77] Grafius DR, Corstanje R, Siriwardena GM, et al. A bird’s eye view: Using circuit theory to study urban landscape connectivity for birds. Landscape Ecology, 2017, 32: 1771-1787 [78] Mettke-Hofmann C, Gwinner E. Long-term memory for a life on the move. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2003, 100: 5863-5866 [79] McRae BH, Hall SA, Beier P, et al. Where to restore ecological connectivity? Detecting barriers and quanti-fying restoration benefits. PLoS One, 2012, 7(12): e0052604 [80] Pinto N, Keitt TH. Beyond the least-cost path: Evaluating corridor redundancy using a graph-theoretic approach. Landscape Ecology, 2008, 24: 253-266 [81] Braunisch V, Segelbacher G, Hirzel AH. Modelling functional landscape connectivity from genetic population structure: A new spatially explicit approach. Molecular Ecology, 2010, 19: 3664-3678 [82] 单楠, 周可新, 潘扬, 等. 生物多样性保护廊道构建方法研究进展. 生态学报, 2019, 39(2): 411-420 [Shan N, Zhou K-X, Pan Y, et al. Research advances in design methods of biodiversity conservation corridors. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(2): 411-420] [83] 陈春娣, 贾振毅,吴胜军, 等. 基于文献计量法的中国景观连接度应用研究进展. 生态学报, 2017, 37(10): 3243-3255 [Chen C-D, Jia Z-Y, Wu S-J, et al. A bibliometric review of Chinese studies on the application of landscape connectivity. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(10): 3243-3255] [84] Bentrup G. Conservation Buffers: Design Guidelines [EB/OL]. (2008-09-01) [2020-11-26]. http://nac.unl.edu/buffers/index.html [85] Fox J, Semel B, Ward MP. The reproductive success of sandhill cranes in midwestern landscapes. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 2019, 83: 1163-1171 [86] Kindlmann P, Burel F. Connectivity measures: A review. Landscape Ecology, 2008, 23: 879-890 |
[1] | LU Zixin, YANG Man, LI Bin, HU Junjie, YU Haibin. Elevational patterns of seed plants and the driving mechanisms in the Himalaya [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(7): 1787-1796. |
[2] | YE Pengcheng, LIU Can, WANG Aihua, WU Jianyong, ZHAO Xiao, CHEN Hui, SI Qin. Theoretical framework, indicator system and practical application of key biodiversity areas. [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(3): 835-845. |
[3] | WEN Huihui, WU Fuzhong, ZHANG Huiling, PENG Qingqing, QIU Danni, PENG Yan. Community structure of soil fauna under different tree species in subtropical forests [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(10): 2797-2804. |
[4] | XIE Jing, ZHANG Yiyue, TANG Zhonghui, SUN Xin. Characteristics of gut microbiome communities in the invasive African giant snail under urbanization gradient [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(10): 2813-2819. |
[5] | WU Ke-xin, SHUI Wei, XUE Cheng-zhi, HUANG Yun-hui, JIANG Cong. Spatiotemporal responses of habitat quality to land use changes in the source area of Pearl River, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(1): 169-177. |
[6] | WANG Yu-zhu, PAN Bao-zhu, GONG Zheng, LI Dian-bao, JIANG Xiao-ming, CHEN Yue, LI Ke. Spatiotemporal variations of fish feeding guilds in Yellow River basin [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(3): 821-828. |
[7] | FU Fei-yu, BU Xin-yu, SHEN Ang-lyu, LIU Bi-lin. Composition and distribution of zooplankton species in the subtropical areas of the Northwestern Pacific Ocean [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(2): 544-550. |
[8] | WANG Xiu-yun, ZHANG Xiao-hong, PANG Chun-mei. Structure dynamics of communities after cutting Phyllostachys edulis along altitude in Mount Tianmu, China. [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(11): 2889-2896. |
[9] | WANG Qi, SHI Na-na, HAN Yu, XIAO Neng-wen. Establishment of an indicator system for comprehensive assessment on terrestrial biodiversity in China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(8): 2773-2782. |
[10] | PENG Li, LIANG Guo-fu, QIU Peng-wei. Effects of microhabitat characteristics on amphibian diversity in urban water system of Kaifeng, Henan, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(7): 2597-2603. |
[11] | ZHANG Zhong-fu, YU Qing-guo, WANG Hang, LIU Hui-hui, ZHAO Ya-chuan, XIE Xue-yang, ZHANG Meng, GENG Wei. Effects of plant community and soil properties on soil bacterial community in Bitahai Wetland, Southwest China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(6): 2199-2208. |
[12] | BAI Wen-fu, YU Lin, LI Jian-hui, NIE Dong-ling, YAN Jia-wen, WU Si-zheng, LI Ji-cheng, XIAO Jin-ding. Structure and species diversity of Cerasus community in Dawei Mountain of Hunan, China. [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(4): 1201-1212. |
[13] | BIAN Qi, WANG Cheng, HAO Ze-zhou. Application of ecoacoustic monitoring in the field of biodiversity science [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(3): 1119-1128. |
[14] | DING Zhang-qi, XU Guo-rui, ZHANG Shuang, ZHANG Yu-xin, MA Ke-ming. Scaling laws of altitudinal pattern of soil fauna diversity in Dongling Mountain, Beijing, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(12): 4272-4278. |
[15] | YANG Wen-xian, LI Shi-hua, PENG Shuang-yun, LI Ying-xin, ZHAO Shou-lou, QIU Li-dan. Identification of important biodiversity areas by InVEST model considering opographic relief: A case study of Yunnan Province, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(12): 4339-4348. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||