Welcome to Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology! Today is Share:

Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology ›› 2026, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 305-316.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202601.028

• Reviews • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Applications of chamber method in measuring greenhouse gases flux in inland aquatic systems: A review

JIA Lei1, ZHANG Mi1,2*, XIAO Wei1,2,3, SHI Jie1, GE Pei1, ZHAO Jiayu4, YANG Fuyu1, HE Yang5   

  1. 1School of Ecology and Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;
    2Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Carbon Source and Sink, China Meteorological Administration, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;
    3Yale-NUIST Center on Atmospheric Environment, State Key Laboratory of Climate System Prediction and Risk Management, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;
    4College of Ocean and Meteorology, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang 524088, Guangdong, China;
    5Ecological Meteorology and Satellite Remote Sensing Center of Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110166, China
  • Received:2025-06-03 Revised:2025-11-20 Published:2026-07-18

Abstract: Inland waters are important sources of greenhouse gases (GHG). The accurate quantification of fluxes is fundamental to assessing their roles in the global GHG cycle. The flux chamber method is the most widely used technique for measuring GHG fluxes in inland waters. Based on whether external air is introduced to maintain stable CO2 concentrations inside the chamber during measurements, flux chambers can be categorized into two types: closed path (non-steady-state) chamber and opened path (steady-state) chamber. We reviewed the basic principles, practical applications, and respective advantages and limitations of those two types. The closed path chamber method is characterized by flexible deployment and simple operation, but it may disturb the micrometeorological conditions within the chamber. In contrast, the opened path chamber method maintains consistent environmental conditions between the chamber interior and the ambient atmosphere, but it imposes higher requirements on the precision of gas analyzers and the stability of control systems. Moreover, we discussed the uncertainties in flux measurements arising from factors such as chamber design (size and shape), observation duration, and gas transfer velocity. We further summarized key operational considerations, including chamber airtightness, pressure equili-brium, gas mixing conditions, and the measurement of gas mixing ratios. Finally, we outlined future directions and application prospects of the flux chamber method in inland water GHG research, aiming to provide a reference for method selection and technological advancement in this field.

Key words: chamber method, inland aquatic system, greenhouse gas flux, uncertainty