欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (5): 1437-1444.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201605.005

• 目次 • 上一篇    下一篇

典型新建绿地上海辰山植物园土壤水库特征及其影响因子

伍海兵1, 方海兰1*, 彭红玲2   

  1. 1上海市园林科学研究所, 上海 200232;
    2上海辰山植物园, 上海 201602
  • 收稿日期:2015-10-10 出版日期:2016-05-18 发布日期:2016-05-18
  • 通讯作者: fhl_1969@126.com
  • 作者简介:伍海兵,男,1986年生,硕士,工程师. 主要从事城市土壤物理性质研究. E-mail: wuhaibing22@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    本文由上海辰山植物园专项项目(G102402)和上海市科委项目(14DZ0503200)资助

Soil water reservoir properties and influencing factors of typical newly-established green belts of Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, China.

WU Hai-bing1, FANG Hai-lan1*, PENG Hong-ling2   

  1. 1Shanghai Institute of Landscape Gardening, Shanghai 200232, China;
    2Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai 201602, China
  • Received:2015-10-10 Online:2016-05-18 Published:2016-05-18

摘要: 研究不同植被类型、压实方式和土壤基本理化性质对典型新建绿地上海辰山植物园土壤水库的影响.结果表明:相对自然林地,植物园土壤总库容、滞洪库容、有效库容均较低,但死库容较大,占总库容的60.6%,这导致绿地蓄洪排涝能力减弱.植物园不同植被类型土壤总库容和滞洪库容大小依次为灌木地﹥乔木地﹥草地﹥竹林地﹥裸地,有效库容以灌木和乔木较高,而裸地和竹林地相对较低,裸地和竹林地死库容占总库容的比例最大,分别为65.5%和67.6%.灌木地总库容、滞洪库容和有效库容与裸地差异显著,植被能显著提高土壤的蓄水持水能力,但机械压实和人为践踏显著降低土壤总库容、滞洪库容和有效库容.土壤容重、饱和导水率、毛管孔隙度、非毛管孔隙度、总孔隙度、黏粒和有机质含量显著影响土壤水库,改善土壤理化性质能显著提高城市绿地土壤水库库容.

Abstract: The effects of different vegetation types, compaction ways and soil basic physico-chemical properties on soil water reservoir in the typical newly-established green belts of Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden were studied. The results showed that the total reservoir capacity, detention capacity and effective storage for the Botanical Garden were lower than those of natural forests. However, the dead storage was very high accounting for 60.6% of the total reservoir capacity, resulting in reduced flood storage and drainage capacity for the greens. The total reservoir capacity and detention capacity of different vegetation types were in order of brush land> tree land> grassland> bamboo land> bare land. The effective storages of the brush land and the tree land were relatively high, whereas those of the bare land and the bamboo land were lower. The ratios of the dead storage over the total re-servoir capacity in the bare land and the bamboo land were relatively high with the values 65.5% and 67.6%, respectively. The total reservoir capacity, detention capacity and effective storage of the brush land were significantly different from those of the bare land. The vegetation significantly improved the water storage and retention capacity for the soil, while the compaction by large machinery and man-caused trampling reduced the total reservoir capacity, detention capacity and effective storage of soils. The water reservoir properties were influenced by soil bulk density, saturated hydraulic conductivity, capillary porosity, non-capillary porosity, total porosity, clay and organic matter contents. Therefore, improving the soil physico-chemical properties might increase the soil reservoir capacity of the urban green belt effectively.