基于可加性生物量模型的大兴安岭东部主要林型森林植被碳储量及其分配

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.201612.012

应用生态学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (12): 3749-3758.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201612.012

基于可加性生物量模型的大兴安岭东部主要林型森林植被碳储量及其分配

彭娓, 董利虎, 李凤日^*

东北林业大学林学院, 哈尔滨 150040

收稿日期:2016-05-30 出版日期:2016-12-18 发布日期:2016-12-18
通讯作者: * E-mail: fengrili@126.com
作者简介:彭娓,女,1989年生,博士研究生. 主要从事林分生长与收获模型研究. E-mail: pengw_2012@126.com
基金资助:
本文由国家科技支撑计划项目(2012BAD22B02)、中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(2572015BX03)和黑龙江省留学归国人员科学基金项目(LC2016007)资助

Carbon storage of forest vegetation and allocation for main forest types in the east of Da-xing’an Mountains based on additive biomass model

PENG Wei, DONG Li-hu, LI Feng-ri^*

School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China

Received:2016-05-30 Online:2016-12-18 Published:2016-12-18
Contact: * E-mail: fengrili@126.com
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Science and Technology Support Program (2012BAD22B02), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (2572015BX03) and the Scientific Research Foundation of Heilongjiang Province for the Returned Overseas Scholars (LC2016007).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于大兴安岭东部地区主要林型的生物量调查数据,建立了3个主要树种的一元可加性生物量模型,探讨了不同林型森林群落和乔木层、灌木层、草本层、凋落物层的碳储量及其分配规律.结果表明: 杜鹃-兴安落叶松林乔、灌、草、凋落物层碳储量分别为71.00、0.34、0.05和11.97 t·hm^-2,杜香-兴安落叶松林各层碳储量分别为47.82、0.88、0和5.04 t·hm^-2,杜鹃-兴安落叶松-白桦混交林分别为56.56、0.44、0.04、8.72 t·hm^-2,杜香-兴安落叶松-白桦混交林分别为46.21、0.66、0.07、6.16 t·hm^-2,杜鹃-白桦林分别为40.90、1.37、0.04、3.67 t·hm^-2,杜香-白桦林分别为36.28、1.12、0.18、4.35 t·hm^-2.林下植被为杜鹃的林分群落碳储量大于林下植被为杜香的林分;林下植被相似的情况下,森林群落碳储量大小顺序为:兴安落叶松林>兴安落叶松-白桦混交林>白桦林;不同林型群落碳储量不同,大小顺序为:杜鹃-兴安落叶松林(83.36 t·hm^-2)>杜鹃-兴安落叶松-白桦混交林(65.76 t·hm^-2)>杜香-兴安落叶松林(53.74 t·hm^-2)>杜香-兴安落叶松-白桦混交林(53.10 t·hm^-2)>杜鹃-白桦林(45.98 t·hm^-2)>杜香-白桦林(41.93 t·hm^-2),且不同林型森林群落碳储量垂直分配规律为:乔木层(85.2%～89.0%)>凋落物层(8.0%～14.4%)>灌木层(0.4%～2.7%)>草本层(0～0.4%).

Abstract: Based on the biomass investigation data of main forest types in the east of Daxing’an Mountains, the additive biomass models of 3 main tree species were developed and the changes of carbon storage and allocation of forest community of tree layer, shrub layer, herb layer and litter layer from different forest types were discussed. The results showed that the carbon storage of tree layer, shrub layer, herb layer and litter layer for Rhododendron dauricum-Larix gmelinii forest was 71.00, 0.34, 0.05 and 11.97 t·hm^-2, respectively. Similarly, the carbon storage of the four layers of Ledum palustre-L. gmelinii forest was 47.82, 0.88, 0, 5.04 t·hm^-2, 56.56, 0.44, 0.04, 8.72 t·hm^-2 for R. dauricum-mixed forest of L. gmelinii-Betula platyphylla, 46.21, 0.66, 0.07, 6.16 t·hm^-2 for L. palustre-mixed forest of L. gmelinii-B. platyphylla, 40.90, 1.37, 0.04, 3.67 t·hm^-2 for R. dauricum-B. platyphylla forest, 36.28, 1.12, 0.18, 4.35 t·hm^-2 for L. palustre-B. platyphylla forest. The carbon storage of forest community for the understory vegetation of R. dauricum was higher than that of the forest with L. palustre. In the condition of similar circumstances for the understory, the order of carbon storage for forest community was L. gmelinii forest > the mixed forest of L. gmelinii-B. platyphylla > B. platyphylla forest. The carbon storage of different forest types was different with the order of R. dauricum-L. gmelinii forest (83.36 t·hm^-2)> R. dauricum-mixed forest of L. gmelinii-B. platyphylla (65.76 t·hm^-2) > L. palustre-L. gmelinii forest (53.74 t·hm^-2)> L. palustre-mixed forest of L. gmelinii-B. platyphylla (53.10 t·hm^-2)> R. dauricum-B. platyphylla forest (45.98 t·hm^-2) > L. palustre-B. platyphylla forest (41.93 t·hm^-2). The order of carbon storage for the vertical distribution in forest communities with diffe-rent forest types was the tree layer (85.2%-89.0%) > litter layer (8.0%-14.4%) > shrub layer (0.4%-2.7%) > herb layer (0-0.4%).

彭娓, 董利虎, 李凤日. 基于可加性生物量模型的大兴安岭东部主要林型森林植被碳储量及其分配[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(12): 3749-3758.

PENG Wei, DONG Li-hu, LI Feng-ri. Carbon storage of forest vegetation and allocation for main forest types in the east of Da-xing’an Mountains based on additive biomass model[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(12): 3749-3758.

参考文献

[1] Dixon RK, Solomon AM, Brown S, et al. Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science, 1994, 263: 185-190
[2] Kauppi PE, Mielikäinen K, Kuusela K. Biomass and carbon budget of European forests, 1971 to 1990. Science, 1992, 256: 70-74
[3] Alexeyev V, Birdsey R, Stakanov V, et al. Carbon in vegetation of Russian forests: Methods to estimate sto-rage and geographical distribution. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 1995, 82: 271-282
[4] Apps MJ, Kurz WA, Beukema SJ, et al. Carbon budget of the Canadian forest product sector. Environmental Science & Policy, 1999, 2: 25-41
[5] Jiao Y (焦燕), Hu H-Q (胡海清). Carbon storage and its dynamics of forest vegetations in Heilongjiang Province. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2005, 16(12): 2248-2252 (in Chinese)
[6] Zhang D-Q (张德全), Sang W-G (桑卫国), Li Y F (李曰峰), et al. Forest organic carbon storage and its trend in Shandong Province. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 2002, 26(suppl.1): 93-97 (in Chinese)
[7] Huang C-D (黄从德), Zhang J (张健), Yang W-L (杨万勤), et al. Spatial differentiation characteristics of forest vegetation carbon stock in Sichuang Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 2009, 29(9): 5115-5121 (in Chinese)
[8] Cai H, Di X, Chang SX, et al. Carbon storage, net primary production, and net ecosystem production in four major temperate forest types in northeastern China. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2016, 46: 620-623
[9] Wang B (王兵), Yang Q-P (杨清培), Guo Q-R (郭起荣), et al. Carbon storage and allocation of Phyllostachys edulis forest and evergreen broad-leaved forest in Dagangshan Mountain, Jiangxi. Guihaia (广西植物), 2011, 31(3): 342-348 (in Chinese)
[10] Song H-P (宋华萍), Qin D-W (覃德文), Wu Q-B (吴庆标). Carbon storage and distribution pattern of Quercus acutissima plantation ecosystem. Journal of Southern Agriculture (南方农业学报), 2014, 45(12): 2220-2224 (in Chinese)
[11] Zhou L (周丽), Zhang W-Q (张卫强), Tang H-H (唐洪辉), et al. Carbon storage and their allocation of young-and-middle aged conifer-broad foliage mixed fore-sts in southern subtropical region. Ecology and Environmental Sciences (生态环境学报), 2014, 23(4): 568-574 (in Chinese)
[12] Wang N (王宁). Study on Distribution Patterns of Carbon Density and Carbon Stock in the Forest Ecosystem of Shanxi. PhD Thesis. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2014 (in Chinese)
[13] Hu H-Q (胡海清), Luo B-Z (罗碧珍), Wei S-J (魏书精), et al. Biomass carbon storage density an carbon sequestration capacity in seven typical forest types of the Xiaoxing’an Mountains, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology (植物生态学报), 2015, 39(2): 140-158 (in Chinese)
[14] Hu H-Q (胡海清), Luo B-Z (罗碧珍), Wei S-J (魏书精), et al. Estimating biological carbon storage of five typical forest types in the Daxing’an Mountains, Heilongjiang, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 2015, 35(17): 5745-5760 (in Chinese)
[15] Liu G-Y (刘桂英), Han G-Z (韩广忠). Study on the distribution of the understory vegetation in Daxing’an Mountains. Journal of Heilongjiang Vocational Institute of Ecological Engineering (黑龙江生态工程职业学院学报), 2006, 19(4): 20-21 (in Chinese)
[16] Ma W (马炜), Sun Y-J (孙玉军), Guo X-Y (郭孝玉), et al. Carbon storage of Larix olgensis plantation at different stand ages. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 2010, 30(17): 4659-4667 (in Chinese)
[17] Jia W-W (贾炜玮), Li F-R (李凤日), Dong L-H (董利虎), et al. Carbon density and storage for Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica plantation based on compatible biomass models. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (北京林业大学学报), 2012, 34(1): 6-13 (in Chinese)
[18] Dong L-H (董利虎),Li F-R (李凤日), Song Y-W (宋玉文). Error structure and additivity of individual tree biomass model for four natural conifer species in Northeast China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2015, 26(3): 704-714 (in Chinese)
[19] Dong L, Zhang L, Li F. A compatible system of biomass equations for three conifer species in Northeast, China. Forest Ecology and Management, 2014, 329: 306-317
[20] Dong L, Zhang L, Li F. Developing additive systems of biomass equations for nine hardwood species in Northeast China. Trees, 2015, 29: 1149-1163
[21] Ming A-G (明安刚), Jia H-Y (贾宏炎), Tian Z-W (田祖为), et al. Carbon storage and allocation in Cunninghamia lanceolate plantations with different stand ages. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2014, 25(4): 940-946 (in Chinese)
[22] Zheng L (郑路), Cai D-X (蔡道雄), Lu L-H (卢立华), et al. Biomass allocation of different species plantations in subtropical area of China. Forest Research (林业科学研究), 2014, 27(4): 454-458 (in Chinese)
[23] Ming A-G (明安刚), Zheng L (郑路), Ma J (麻静), et al. Biomass, carbon stock and allocation cha-racteristics in Mesua ferrea plantation. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (北京林业大学学报), 2015, 37(2): 32-39 (in Chinese)
[24] Huang X-M (黄雪蔓), You Y-M (尤业明), Lan J-C (蓝嘉川), et al. The effect of carbon storage and its allocation in Cunninghamia lanceolate plantations with different thinning intensities. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 2016, 36(1): 156-163 (in Chinese)
[25] Lan S-A (兰斯安), Du H (杜虎), Zeng F-P (曾馥平), et al. Carbon storage and allocation in Cunninghamia lanceolate plantations with different stand ages. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2016, 27(4): 1125-1134 (in Chinese)
[26] Wang H-Y (王洪岩), Wang W-J (王文杰), Qiu L (邱岭), et al. Differences in biomass, litter layer mass and SOC storage changing with tree growth in Larix gmelinii plantations in Northeast China. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 2012, 32(3): 833-843 (in Chinese)
[27] Wei S-J (魏书精). Quantitative Evaluation Methods of Carbon Emissions from Forest Fires in Heilongjiang Province, China. PhD Thesis. Harbin: NortheastFore-stry University, 2013 (in Chinese)
[28] Zhou Y-R (周玉荣), Yu Z-L (于振良), Zhao S-D (赵士洞). Carbon storage and budget of major Chinese forest types. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 2000, 24(5): 518-522 (in Chinese)

基于可加性生物量模型的大兴安岭东部主要林型森林植被碳储量及其分配

Carbon storage of forest vegetation and allocation for main forest types in the east of Da-xing’an Mountains based on additive biomass model

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价