云南断陷盆地喀斯特4种典型种植模式的能值分析

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.201808.020

应用生态学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (8): 2641-2650.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201808.020

云南断陷盆地喀斯特4种典型种植模式的能值分析

邹志刚^1,2,3*, 张浩^1,2,3*, 曾昭霞^1,2,3*, 张建云⁴, 赵杰军⁴, 包松莲⁴, 曾馥平^1,2,3*

¹中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所亚热带农业生态过程重点实验室, 长沙 410125;
²中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
³中国科学院环江喀斯特生态系统观测研究站, 广西环江 547100;
⁴中国林业科学研究院资源昆虫研究所, 昆明 650224

收稿日期:2017-11-23 出版日期:2018-08-20 发布日期:2018-08-20
通讯作者: E-mail: fpzeng@isa.ac.cn
作者简介:邹志刚,男,1995年生,硕士研究生. 主要从事区域与景观生态研究. E-mail: zhigangzou0203@163.com
基金资助:
本文由国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0502505)、国家科技支撑计划项目(2015BAD06B04)、中国科学院西部行动计划项目(KZCX2-XB3-10)和中国科学院“西部之光”人才培养项目资助

Emergy analysis of four typical planting modes in Karst faulted basins of Yunnan Province, China.

ZOU Zhi-gang^1,2,3, ZHANG Hao^1,2,3, ZENG Zhao-xia^1,2,3, ZHANG Jian-yun⁴, ZHAO Jie-jun⁴, BAO Song-lian⁴, ZENG Fu-ping^1,2,3*

¹Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, China;
²University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
³Huanjiang Observation and Research Station for Karst Ecosystem, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Huanjiang 547100, Guangxi, China;
⁴Research Institute of Resources Insect, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Kunming 650224, China.

Received:2017-11-23 Online:2018-08-20 Published:2018-08-20
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (2016YFC0502505), the National Key Technology Research and Development Program of China (2015BAD06B04), the Chinese Academy of Sciences Western Action Plan (KZCX2-XB3-10) and the Chinese Academy of Sciences “West Light” Talent Training Program.

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 准确评价断陷盆地的典型种植模式,可为当地提供科学的种植指导.本研究运用能值分析的方法,对云南省蒙自市万寿菊种植模式、石榴种植模式、石榴+草+羊模式与传统的玉米种植模式进行对比,分析了这些石漠化治理模式的生态效益和经济效益.结果表明:石榴种植模式[环境负载率(ELR)为13.80,能值恢复率(ERR)为0.41]和万寿菊种植模式(ELR为0.30,ERR为-2.87)的生态效益低于传统的玉米种植模式(ELR为1.30,ERR为4.64),但是它们的单位净经济效益(EPBU)分别为玉米种植模式的3.05和59.98倍,说明前两者的经济效益都超过玉米模式;石榴+草+羊种植模式的生态经济效益最高.添加牧草+牲畜子系统到石榴种植模式能够使石榴+牧草+牲畜的种植模式同时拥有较高的生态效益(ELR为4.95,ERR为0.63)和经济效益(EPBU为玉米模式的71.38倍).建议当地政府增加对万寿菊模式和石榴+草+羊模式的技术支持,包括优化肥料投入结构、作物种植和牲畜养殖工艺;同时,政府可为果品和鲜花的采摘建立短期的劳务市场.

Abstract: Accurate evaluation of typical cropping patterns in faulted basins can provide scientific guidance for planting in the area. The planting modes of marigold, pomegranate, pomegranate+grass+sheep in Mengzi City of Yunnan Province were compared with the traditional corn planting mode. The ecological benefits and economy benefits of these rocky desertification control modes were analyzed by the method of emergy analysis. The environmental loading ratio (ELR) and emergy restoration ratio (ERR) were 13.80 and 0.41 in pomegranate planting mode, respectively, while 0.30 and -2.87 in marigold planting mode. The ecological benefits in pomegranate planting mode and marigold planting mode were lower than that of corn, and ELR and ERR were 1.30 and 4.64, respectively. However, the economic pure benefit per unit (EPBU) in pomegranate planting mode and marigold planting mode were 3.05 and 59.98 times of that in corn mode, respectively, indicating that pomegranate planting mode and marigold panting mode had higher economic benefits than that of corn. Pomegranate+pasture+sheep mode had the highest ecological and economic benefits among the four modes. The plus of forage+livestock subsystem to pomegranate planting mode had high eco-efficiency (ELR of 4.95, ERR of 0.63) and economic benefit (EPBU of 71.38 times than that of corn). Thus, we recommend that the local government should increase technical support for marigold planting mode and pomegranate+pasture+sheep mode, which including optimizing structures of fertilizer input, and crop cultivation and livestock breeding processes. Meanwhile, government could establish short-term labor markets for picking of fruits and flowers.

邹志刚, 张浩, 曾昭霞, 张建云, 赵杰军, 包松莲, 曾馥平. 云南断陷盆地喀斯特4种典型种植模式的能值分析[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(8): 2641-2650.

ZOU Zhi-gang, ZHANG Hao, ZENG Zhao-xia, ZHANG Jian-yun, ZHAO Jie-jun, BAO Song-lian, ZENG Fu-ping. Emergy analysis of four typical planting modes in Karst faulted basins of Yunnan Province, China.[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(8): 2641-2650.

参考文献

[1] Zhang F-Q (张伏全). The present situation and countermeasures of rocky desertification in Yunnan Province. Symposium on Integrated Management of Stony Desertification and Ecological Civilization Construction. Chongzuo, 2015: 79-85 (in Chinese)
[2] Yao Y-H (姚永慧). Research progress and prospect of Karst desertification in southwest China. Progress in Geography (地理科学进展), 2014, 33(1): 76-84 (in Chinese)
[3] Xiong K-N (熊康宁), Chi Y-K (池永宽). The pro-blems in southern China Karst ecosystem in Southern of China and its countermeasures. Ecological Economy (生态经济), 2015, 31(1): 23-30 (in Chinese)
[4] Xiao H (肖华), Xiong K-N (熊康宁), Zhang H (张浩), et al. Research progress for Karst rocky desertification control models. China Population, Resources and Environment (中国人口·资源与环境), 2014, 24(Suppl.1): 330-334 (in Chinese)
[5] Wen L (文丽), Song T-Q (宋同清), Du H (杜虎), et al. The succession characteristics and its driving mechanism of plant community in Karst region, Southwest China. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 2015, 35(17): 5822-5833 (in Chinese)
[6] Zhang M-Y (张明阳), Wang K-L (王克林), Liu H-Y (刘会玉), et al. Impacts of ecological restoration on vegetation carbon storage in the typical Karst region of northwest Guangxi, China. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 2014, 33(9): 2288-2295 (in Chinese)
[7] Du H (杜虎), Peng W-X (彭晚霞), Song T-Q (宋同清), et al. Plant community characteristics and its coupling relationships with soil in depressions between Karst hills, North Guangxi, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology (植物生态学报), 2013, 37(3): 197-208 (in Chinese)
[8] Shu W-C (苏维词), Zhu W-X (朱文孝), Xiong K-N (熊康宁). Stone desertification and eco-economics improving model in Guizhou Karst mountain. Carsologica Sinica (中国岩溶), 2002, 21(1): 19-24 (in Chinese)
[9] Zhang X (张喜), Chui Y-C (崔迎春). Eco-division and adaptive models for returning farmland to forest project in Guizhou Karst upland. Guizhou Forestry Science and Technology (贵州林业科技), 2005, 33(2): 46-52 (in Chinese)
[10] Zeng F-P (曾馥平), Wang K-L (王克林). Effects of grain for green models in Karst regions in Northwest Guangxi. Rural Eco-Environment (农村生态环境), 2005, 21(2): 18-22 (in Chinese)
[11] Jin S-X (金深逊), Zhou K (周凯). Discussion on developing ecological animal husbandry in Karst region: Experimental study on artificial breeding of grass in rock desertification area of Bijie. Journal of Rural Economics and Science (农村经济与科技), 2010, 21(7): 99-101 (in Chinese)
[12] Qin Z-Q (覃宗泉), Lou X-W (娄秀伟), Lei H-Y (雷会义). Controlling Karst rocky desertification by developing ecological grass and animal husbandry in Anshun City, Guizhou. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences (贵州农业科技), 2008, 36(2): 129-131 (in Chinese)
[13] Bai X-Y (白晓永), Xiong K-N (熊康宁), Yang L (杨龙), et al. The soil erosion in Karst stony desertification mountain area and prevention and control mode: With a special reference to Zhenning County in Guizhou Province. Journal of Guizhou Normal University (Natural Sciences) (贵州师范大学学报:自然科学版), 2005, 23(4): 34-38 (in Chinese)
[14] Luo L (罗林), Wang X-M (王兴明), Meng T-Y (孟天友), et al. Optimized mode of terrace and mat-ching smallsized hydraulic project in mountain area of Karst region. Soil and Water Conservation in China (中国水土保持), 2009(3): 41-44 (in Chinese)
[15] Shu W-C (苏维词), Zhu W-X (朱文孝), Teng J-Z (滕建珍). Eco-controlling modes of rocky desertification in Karst gorge region of Xingbei Town in Guizhou Province and its effects. Ecology and Environment (生态环境), 2004, 13(1): 57-60 (in Chinese)
[16] Wang J-L (王家录), Cui Z-L (翠章玲). Research on modes of restoration and reconstruction of Karst rocky desertification ecosystem. Journal of Anshun University (安顺学院学报), 2008, 10(2): 90-92 (in Chinese)
[17] Xiong K-N (熊康宁). Environmental transimigration and sustainabel development of the Karst region in Guizhou. China Population, Resources and Environment (中国人口·资源与环境), 1999, 9(2): 64-67 (in Chinese)
[18] Zhang F-T (张凤太), Su W-C (苏维词). Development models of eco-agriculture and countermeasures in Karst mountainous village of Three-Gorge area. Research of Agricultural Modernization (农业现代化研究), 2007, 28(2): 214-217 (in Chinese)
[19] Mei Z-M (梅再美), Xiong K-N (熊康宁). A study on the fundamental models and environmental beneficial results of ecological rehabilitation in Guizhou Karst mountain areas. Journal of Guizhou Normal University (Natural Sciences) (贵州师范大学学报:自然科学版), 2000, 18(4): 9-17 (in Chinese)
[20] Odum HT. Environmental Accounting: EMERGY and Environmental Decision Making. New York: John Wiley, 1996
[21] Tan C-C (谭程程). The Emergy-measurement Analysis of Ecological and Economic Systems of Heilongjiang Province. PhD Thesis. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2012 (in Chinese)
[22] Sun H-Y (孙海燕), Wan S-B (万书波), Li L (李林), et al. Emergy analysis on the sustainable deve-lopment of peanut production systems in Shandong Pro-vince. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas (干旱地区农业研究), 2015, 33(6): 257-264 (in Chinese)
[23] Yang J (杨谨), Chen B (陈彬), Liu G-Y (刘耕源). Emergy evaluation for sustainability of Biogas-linked agriculture ecosystem: A case study of Gongcheng County. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 2012, 32(13): 4007-4016 (in Chinese)
[24] Cao J-H (曹建华), Deng Y (邓艳), Yang H (杨慧), et al. Rocky desertification evolution, treatment technology and demonstration in Karst faulted basins, Southwest China. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 2016, 36(22): 7103-7108 (in Chinese)
[25] Yunnan Statistics Bureau (云南统计局). Yunnan Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2016 (in Chinese)
[26] Bao S-D (鲍士旦). Analysis of Soil Agrochemistry. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000 (in Chinese)
[27] Brown MT, Campbell DE, Vilbiss CD, et al. The geobiosphere emergy baseline: A synthesis. Ecological Modelling, 2016, 339: 92-95
[28] Lu HF, Yuan Y, Campbell DE, et al. Integrated water quality, emergy and economic evaluation of three bioremediation treatment systems for eutrophic water. Ecological Engineering, 2014, 69: 244-254
[29] Lu HF, Campbell DE, Li ZA, et al. Emergy synthesis of an agro-forest restoration system in lower subtropical China. Ecological Engineering, 2006, 27: 175-192
[30] Shui W (税伟), Chen Y-P (陈毅萍), Su Z-A (苏正安), et al. Emergy-based agricultural ecosystem ana-lysis for specialized tea planting: A case study of Anxi County, Fujian Province. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture (中国生态农业学报), 2016, 24(12): 1703-1713 (in Chinese)
[31] Xia T-Y (夏泰英), Xu Y-T (许玉婷), Lian X-R (连相汝), et al. Evaluation for sustainability and energy analysis of agriculture ecological garden in southwest mountainous in Jinan. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University (Natural Science) (山东农业大学学报:自然科学学报), 2014, 45(3): 458-462 (in Chinese)
[32] Yang H-L (杨海龙), Lv Y (吕耀), Min Q-W (闵庆文), et al. Energy comparison of rice-fish agriculture and rice monoeropping: A case study of Xiaohuang Village, Congjiang County, Guizhou Province. Resources Science (资源科学), 2009, 31(1): 48-55 (in Chinese)
[33] Li Y-B (李云斌), Xu W-X (徐文修), Zheng Y-D (郑英达), et al. An investigation on coupling of farming and stockbreeding of economic system for Oasisa agricultural ecology based on energy value in Aksu. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University (新疆农业大学学报), 2009, 32(4): 77-82 (in Chinese)
[34] Sun L (孙路), Han J-C (韩霁昌), Wu F-Q (吴发启). Emergy and benefit evaluation of “pig-methane-pomegranate”recycling agriculture in Guanzhong Plain. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas (干旱地区农业研究), 2017, 35(4): 199-204 (in Chinese)
[35] Fan X-S (范小杉) , Gao J-X (高吉喜). Evolutionary tendency and current status of Chinese agricultural economic ecosystem. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment (干旱区资源与环境), 2010, 24(7): 1-9 (in Chinese)
[36] Wang K (王坤), Lu H-F (陆宏芳), Tan Y-W (谭耀文), et al. Emergy, economic and soil based-evaluation of four Lingnan fruit production systems. Ecology and Environmental Sciences (生态环境学报), 2009, 18(6): 228-234 (in Chinese)
[37] Sun Y (孙玥), Cheng Q-G (程全国), Li Y (李晔), et al. Assessment of eco-economic system sustainable development of Liaoning Province based on emergy analysis. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2014, 25(1): 188-194 (in Chinese)
[38] Sun F (孙凡), Yang S (杨松), Zuo S-J (左首军), et al. Input and output study of agricultural eco-economic system of China based on the theory of emergy analysis. Journal of Southwest University (Natural Science) (西南大学学报:自然科学版), 2010, 32(10): 135-141 (in Chinese)

云南断陷盆地喀斯特4种典型种植模式的能值分析

Emergy analysis of four typical planting modes in Karst faulted basins of Yunnan Province, China.

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价