应用生态学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 1043-1054.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202003.032
• 综合评述 • 上一篇
王可洪1,2, 袁兴中1,3*, 张冠雄1,2, 武帅楷4, 刘双爽1,2, 张梦婕1,2
收稿日期:
2019-09-05
出版日期:
2020-03-15
发布日期:
2020-03-15
通讯作者:
E-mail: 1072000659@qq.com
作者简介:
王可洪, 男, 1988年生, 博士研究生。主要从事无脊椎动物生态学研究。E-mail: wang018837@hotmail.com
基金资助:
WANG Ke-hong1,2, YUAN Xing-zhong1,3*, ZHANG Guan-xiong1,2, WU Shuai-kai4, LIU Shuang-shuang1,2, ZHANG Meng-jie1,2
Received:
2019-09-05
Online:
2020-03-15
Published:
2020-03-15
Contact:
E-mail: 1072000659@qq.com
Supported by:
摘要: 河岸是河流与陆地之间重要的生态界面,生物多样性丰富,但受到人为活动的严重威胁。无脊椎动物在河岸生物多样性中占有重要地位,发挥着非常重要的生态功能,也是水生生态系统和陆地生态系统之间物质和能量联系的重要纽带。尽管已有很多学者对河岸无脊椎动物群落进行了研究,但缺乏对河岸无脊椎动物多样性维持机制的总结。本文结合洪水和干旱、营养物质、微生境多样性、河岸植被、微气候梯度、食物资源以及河流空间梯度等影响因素,初步讨论和归纳了河岸无脊椎动物多样性的维持机制。周期性洪水和干旱引发了无脊椎动物的繁殖和迁移等行为,增加了河岸无脊椎动物群落周转率,为无脊椎动物创造了理想的条件。充足的营养物质使河岸具有较高的初级生产力,支撑了较高的无脊椎动物多样性。较高的微生境多样性为无脊椎动物提供了多样的生态位空间,孕育了特殊的河岸无脊椎动物种类。复杂的河岸植物群落不但是河岸无脊椎动物的食物来源之一,也为河岸无脊椎动物提供了多样的生态位空间和重要的避难场所。微气候环境的空间分异提供了复杂多样的生境条件,为水生无脊椎动物和陆生无脊椎动物种类在河岸共存创造了条件。跨越界面的资源补给增加了河岸无脊椎动物的食物可利用率,为河岸无脊椎动物提供了特殊的食物来源。这些因素在空间上呈现出明显的纵向梯度和侧向梯度,从更大尺度上为河岸无脊椎动物的多样化提供了条件。因此,探讨河岸无脊椎动物多样性的维持机制对于河岸生物多样性保护以及河流生态系统综合管理具有重要的指导意义。
王可洪, 袁兴中, 张冠雄, 武帅楷, 刘双爽, 张梦婕. 河岸无脊椎动物多样性维持机制研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(3): 1043-1054.
WANG Ke-hong, YUAN Xing-zhong, ZHANG Guan-xiong, WU Shuai-kai, LIU Shuang-shuang, ZHANG Meng-jie. Maintaining mechanisms of riparian invertebrate biodiversity: A review[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(3): 1043-1054.
[1] | Gregory SV, Swanson FJ, McKee WA, et al. An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones focus on links between land and water. BioScience, 1991, 41: 540-551 |
[2] | Naiman RJ, Décamps H. The ecology of interfaces: Riparian zones. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1997, 28: 621-658 |
[3] | 杨胜天, 王雪蕾, 刘昌明, 等. 岸边带生态系统研究进展. 环境科学学报, 2007, 27(6): 894-905 [Yang S-T, Wang X-L, Liu C-M, et al. Recent advances in the study of riparian ecosystems. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2007, 27(6): 894-905] |
[4] | Clinton BD, Vose JM, Knoepp JD, et al. Can structural and functional characteristics be used to identify riparian zone width in southern Appalachian headwater catchments? Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2010, 40: 235-253 |
[5] | Naiman RJ, Décamps H, Pollock M. The role of riparian corridors in maintaining regional biodiversity. Ecological Applications, 1993, 3: 209-212 |
[6] | Sabo JL, Sponseller R, Dixon M, et al. Riparian zones increase regional species richness by harboring different, not more, species. Ecology, 2005, 86: 56-62 |
[7] | Barman R, Jain AK, Liang M. Climate-driven uncertainties in modeling terrestrial energy and water fluxes: A site-level to global-scale analysis. Global Change Bio-logy, 2014, 20: 1885-1900 |
[8] | Paetzold A, Schubert CJ, Tockner K. Aquatic terrestrial linkages along a braided-river: Riparian arthropods feeding on aquatic insects. Ecosystems, 2005, 8: 748-759 |
[9] | Donaldson MR, Burnett NJ, Braun DC, et al. Taxonomic bias and international biodiversity conservation research. Facets, 2016, 1: 105-113 |
[10] | Tockner K, Stanford JA. Riverine flood plains: Present state and future trends. Environmental Conservation, 2002, 29: 308-330 |
[11] | Sadler JP, Bell D, Fowles A. The hydroecological controls and conservation value of beetles on exposed riverine sediments in England and Wales. Biological Conservation, 2004, 118: 41-56 |
[12] | Robinson CT, Tockner K, Ward JV. The fauna of dynamic riverine landscapes. Freshwater Biology, 2002, 47: 661-677 |
[13] | Paetzold A, Yoshimura C, Tockner K. Riparian arthropod responses to flow regulation and river channelization. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008, 45: 894-903 |
[14] | Rykken JJ, Moldenke AR, Olson DH. Headwater riparian forest-floor invertebrate communities associated with alternative forest management practices. Ecological Applications, 2007, 17: 1168-1183 |
[15] | Bonn A, Hagen K, Reiche DWV. The significance of flood regimes for carabid beetle and spider communities in riparian habitats: A comparison of three major rivers in Germany. River Research and Applications, 2002, 18: 43-64 |
[16] | Corti R, Datry T. Drying of a temperate, intermittent river has little effect on adjacent riparian arthropod communities. Freshwater Biology, 2014, 59: 666-678 |
[17] | Gerisch M. Non-random patterns of functional redundancy revealed in ground beetle communities facing an extreme flood event. Functional Ecology, 2014, 28: 1504-1512 |
[18] | Gibb H, Retter B, Cunningham SA, et al. Does wing morphology affect recolonization of restored farmland by ground-dwelling beetles? Restoration Ecology, 2017, 25: 234-242 |
[19] | Adis J, Junk WJ. Terrestrial invertebrates inhabiting lowland river floodplains of Central Amazonia and Central Europe: A review. Freshwater Biology, 2002, 47: 711-731 |
[20] | Corti R, Datry T. Terrestrial and aquatic invertebrates in the riverbed of an intermittent river: Parallels and contrasts in community organisation. Freshwater Biology, 2016, 61: 1308-1320 |
[21] | Soykan CU, Brand LA, Ries L, et al. Multitaxonomic diversity patterns along a desert riparian-upland gradient. PLoS One, 2012, 7(1): e28235 |
[22] | Richardson JS, Naiman RJ, Swanson FJ, et al. Riparian communities associated with pacific northwest headwater streams: Assemblages, processes, and uniqueness. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2005, 41: 935-947 |
[23] | Lambeets K, Hendrickx F, Vanacker S, et al. Assemblage structure and conservation value of spiders and carabid beetles from restored lowland river banks. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2008, 17: 3133-3148 |
[24] | Andersen J, Hanssen O. Riparian beetles, a unique, but vulnerable element in the fauna of Fennoscandia. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2005, 14: 3497-3524 |
[25] | Marx MT, Guhmann P, Decker P. Adaptations and predispositions of different middle European arthropod taxa (Collembola, Araneae, Chilopoda, Diplopoda) to flooding and drought conditions. Animals, 2012, 2: 564-590 |
[26] | Januschke K, Brunzel S, Haase P, et al. Effects of stream restorations on riparian mesohabitats, vegetation and carabid beetles. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2011, 20: 3147-3164 |
[27] | Battirola LD, Marques MI, Rosado-Neto G H, et al. Vertical and time distribution of Diplopoda (Arthropoda: Myriapoda) in a monodominant forest in Pantanal of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Zoologia, 2009, 26: 479-487 |
[28] | Braccia A, Batzer DP. Invertebrates associated with woody debris in a Southeastern U.S. forested floodplain wetland. Wetlands, 2001, 21: 18-31 |
[29] | Manderbach R, Plachter H. Life strategy of the carabid beetle Nebria picicornis (Fabr. 1801) (Coleoptera, Cara-bidae) on river banks. Beitrage kologie, 1997, 3: 17-27 |
[30] | Ballinger A, Nally RM, Lake PS. Immediate and longer-term effects of managed flooding on floodplain invertebrate assemblages in south-eastern Australia: Generation and maintenance of a mosaic landscape. Freshwater Bio-logy, 2005, 50: 1190-1205 |
[31] | Williams DD. The Biology of Temporary Waters. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2006: 121-159 |
[32] | Bogan MT, Boersma KS. Aerial dispersal of aquatic invertebrates along and away from arid-land streams. Freshwater Science, 2012, 31: 1131-1144 |
[33] | Velasco J, Millan A. Insect dispersal in a drying desert stream: Effects of temperature and water loss. The Southwestern Naturalist, 1998, 43: 80-87 |
[34] | Datry T. Benthic and hyporheic invertebrate assemblages along a flow intermittence gradient: Effects of duration of dry events. Freshwater Biology, 2012, 57: 563-574 |
[35] | Strachan SR, Chester ET, Robson BJ. Freshwater invertebrate life history strategies for surviving desiccation. Springer Science Reviews, 2015, 3: 57-75 |
[36] | Boulton AJ, Suter PJ. Ecology of temporary streams-an australian perspective// De Deckker P, Williams WD, eds. Limnology in Australia. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, 1986: 313-327 |
[37] | Lake PS. Ecological effects of perturbation by drought in flowing waters. Freshwater Biology, 2003, 48: 1161-1172 |
[38] | Larimore RW, Childers WF, Heckrotte C. Destruction and re-establishment of stream fish and invertebrates affected by drought. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 1959, 88: 261-285 |
[39] | Williams DD, Hynes HBN. The ecology of temporary streams I: The faunas of two Canadian streams. International Review of Hydrobiology and Hydrography, Berlin, 1976: 761-787 |
[40] | Larned ST, Datry T, Robinson CT. Invertebrate and microbial responses to inundation in an ephemeral river reach in New Zealand: Effects of preceding dry periods. Aquatic Sciences, 2007, 69: 554-567 |
[41] | Sánchez-Montoya MDM, Von Schiller D, Ruhí A, et al. Responses of ground-dwelling arthropods to surface flow drying in channels and adjacent habitats along Mediterranean streams. Ecohydrology, 2016, 9: 1376-1387 |
[42] | Steward AL, Marshall JC, Sheldon F, et al. Terrestrial invertebrates of dry river beds are not simply subsets of riparian assemblages. Aquatic Sciences, 2011, 73: 551 |
[43] | Wishart MJ. The terrestrial invertebrate fauna of a temporary stream in southern Africa. African Zoology, 2000, 35: 193-200 |
[44] | Kolesnikov FN, Karamyan AN, Hoback WW. Survival of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) submerged during floods: Field and laboratory studies. European Journal of Entomology, 2012, 109: 71-76 |
[45] | Framenau VW, Elgar MA. Cohort dependent life-history traits in a wolf spider (Araneae: Lycosidae) with a bimodal life cycle. Journal of Zoology, 2005, 265: 179-188 |
[46] | Boulton AJ, Stanley EH. Hyporheic processes during flooding and drying in a Sonoran Desert stream II: Faunal dynamics. Archiv Fur Hydrobiologie, 1995, 134: 27-52 |
[47] | 董哲仁, 张晶. 洪水脉冲的生态效应. 水利学报, 2009, 40(3): 281-288 [Dong Z-R, Zhang J. Ecological effect of flood pulses. Chinese Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2009, 40(3): 281-288] |
[48] | Mccluney KE, Sabo JL. River drying lowers the diversity and alters the composition of an assemblage of desert riparian arthropods. Freshwater Biology, 2012, 57: 91-103 |
[49] | Poff NL, Allan JD, Bain MB, et al. The natural flow regime. BioScience, 1997, 47: 769-784 |
[50] | Weibel R. Nitrogen Deposition in a Riparian Zone. PhD Thesis. Zurich, the Switzerland: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 2011 |
[51] | Langhans SD, Tockner K. The role of timing, duration, and frequency of inundation in controlling leaf litter decomposition in a river-floodplain ecosystem (Tagliamento, northeastern Italy). Oecologia, 2006, 147: 501-509 |
[52] | Groffman PM, Gold AJ, Simmons RC. Nitrate dynamics in riparian forests: Microbial studies. Journal of Environmental Quality, 1992, 21: 666-671 |
[53] | Hibbs DE, DeBell DS, Tarrant RF. The Biology and Management of Red Alder. Corvallis, OR, USA: Oregon State University Press, 1994: 57-72 |
[54] | Shure DJ, Gottschalk MR. Litter-fall patterns within a floodplain forest. The American Midland Naturalist, 1985, 114: 98-111 |
[55] | Kuglerová L, Jansson R, gren A, et al. Groundwater discharge creates hotspots of riparian plant species richness in a boreal forest stream network. Ecology, 2014, 95: 715-725 |
[56] | Hunt RJ, Strand M, Walker JF. Measuring groundwater-surface water interaction and its effect on wetland stream benthic productivity, Trout Lake watershed, northern Wisconsin, USA. Journal of Hydrology, 2006, 320: 370-384 |
[57] | Hering D, Gerhard M, Manderbach R, et al. Impact of a 100-year flood on vegetation, benthic invertebrates, riparian fauna and large woody debris standing stock in an alpine floodplain. River Research and Applications, 2004, 20: 445-457 |
[58] | Bates A, Sadler J, Perry J, et al. The microspatial distribution of beetles (Coleoptera) on exposed riverine sediments (ERS). European Journal of Entomology, 2007, 104: 479-487 |
[59] | Bednarska AJ, Wyga B, Mikus' P, et al. Ground beetle communities in a mountain river subjected to restoration: The Raba River, Polish Carpathians. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 610-611: 1180-1192 |
[60] | Jhnig SC, Brunzel S, Gacek S, et al. Effects of re-braiding measures on hydromorphology, floodplain vegetation, ground beetles and benthic invertebrates in mountain rivers. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2009, 46: 406-416 |
[61] | Ramey TL, Richardson JS. Terrestrial invertebrates in the riparian zone: mechanisms underlying their unique diversity. BioScience, 2017, 67: 808-819 |
[62] | Maag N, Karpati T, Bollmann K. Semi-natural river system maintains functional connectivity and gene flow of the critically endangered gravel grasshopper (Chorthippus pullus). Biological Conservation, 2013, 158: 88-97 |
[63] | Datry T, Corti R, Belletti B, et al. Ground-dwelling arthropod communities across braided river landscape mosaics: A Mediterranean perspective. Freshwater Biology, 2014, 59: 1308-1322 |
[64] | 牟长城, 倪志英, 李东, 等. 长白山溪流河岸带森林木本植物多样性沿海拔梯度分布规律. 应用生态学报, 2007, 18(5): 943-940 [Mu C-C, Ni Z-Y, Li D, et al. Distribution patterns of woody plant diversity in stream riparian forests along an altitudinal gradient in Changbai Mountains. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2007, 18(5): 943-950] |
[65] | Little PJ, Richardson JS, Alila Y. Channel and landscape dynamics in the alluvial forest mosaic of the Carmanah River valley, British Columbia, Canada. Geomorphology, 2013, 202: 86-100 |
[66] | Brose U. Bottom-up control of carabid beetle communities in early successional wetlands: Mediated by vegetation structure or plant diversity? Oecologia, 2003, 135: 407-413 |
[67] | Antvogel H, Bonn A. Environmental parameters and microspatial distribution of insects: A case study of carabids in an alluvial forest. Ecography, 2001, 24: 470-482 |
[68] | Braun BM, Pires MM, Stenert C, et al. Effects of ripa-rian vegetation width and substrate type on riffle beetle community structure. Entomological Science, 2018, 21: 66-75 |
[69] | Ebeling A, Hines J, Hertzog LR, et al. Plant diversity effects on arthropods and arthropod-dependent ecosystem functions in a biodiversity experiment. Basic and Applied Ecology, 2018, 26: 50-63 |
[70] | Greenstone MH. Determinants of web spider species diversity: Vegetation structural diversity vs. prey availabi-lity. Oecologia, 1984, 62: 299-304 |
[71] | Collinge SK, Holyoak M, Barr CB, et al. Riparian habitat fragmentation and population persistence of the threatened valley elderberry longhorn beetle in central California. Biological Conservation, 2001, 100: 103-113 |
[72] | Amlin NM, Rood SB. Comparative tolerances of riparian willows and cottonwoods to water-table decline. Wetlands, 2002, 22: 338-346 |
[73] | Mccluney KE, Sabo JL. Water availability directly determines per capita consumption at two trophic levels. Eco-logy, 2009, 90: 1463-1469 |
[74] | Lesage CM, Merritt R, Wipfli MS. Headwater riparian invertebrate communities associated with red alder and conifer wood and leaf litter in southeastern Alaska. Northwest Science, 2005, 79: 218-232 |
[75] | Ober HK, Hayes JP. Influence of forest riparian vegetation on abundance and biomass of nocturnal flying insects. Forest Ecology and Management, 2008, 256: 1124-1132 |
[76] | De Ruiter P, Wolters V, Moore JC, et al. Dynamic Food Webs. Burlington,UK: Academic Press, 2005: 211-222 |
[77] | Brosofske KD, Chen J, Naiman RJ, et al. Harvesting effects on microclimatic gradients from small streams to uplands in western Washington. Ecological Applications, 1997, 7: 1188-1200 |
[78] | Allen DC. Microclimate modification by riparian vegetation affects the structure and resource limitation of arthropod communities. Ecosphere, 2016, 7: e01200 |
[79] | Henshall SE, Sadler JP, Hannah DM, et al. The role of microhabitat and food availability in determining riparian invertebrate distributions on gravel bars: A habitat manipulation experiment. Ecohydrology, 2011, 4: 512-519 |
[80] | Wenninger EJ, Fagan WF. Effect of river flow manipulation on wolf spider assemblages at three desert riparian sites. Journal of Arachnology, 2000, 28: 115-122 |
[81] | Shelley RM, Crawford CS. Cnemodesmus riparius, n. sp., a riparian milliped from the Namib Desert, Africa (Polydesmida: Paradoxosomatidae). Virginia Museum of Natural History, 1996, 4: 1-8 |
[82] | Nelson SM. The Western Viceroy butterfly (Nymphalidae: Limenitis archippus obsoleta): An indicator for riparian restoration in the arid southwestern United States? Ecological Indicators, 2003, 3: 203-211 |
[83] | Andersen J. Mechanisms in the shift of a riparian ground beetle (Carabidae) between reproduction and hibernation habitat. Journal of Insect Behavior, 2006, 19: 545-558 |
[84] | Cummins MP. Amphibious behavior of a tropical adult tiger beetle, Oxycheila polita Bates (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). The Coleopterists’ Bulletin, 1992, 46: 145-151 |
[85] | Henschel JR, Mahsberg D, Stumpf H. Allochthonous aquatic insects increase predation and decrease herbivory in river shore food webs. Oikos, 2001, 93: 429-438 |
[86] | Larsen S, Muehlbauer JD, Marti E. Resource subsidies between stream and terrestrial ecosystems under global change. Global Change Biology, 2016, 22: 2489-2504 |
[87] | Richardson JS, Sato T. Resource subsidy flows across freshwater-terrestrial boundaries and influence on processes linking adjacent ecosystems. Ecohydrology, 2015, 8: 406-415 |
[88] | 张一新, 向洪勇. 跨越生境的资源补贴对生态系统的影响研究进展. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(2): 699-711 [Zhang Y-X, Xiang H-Y. Impacts of cross-habitat resource subsidies on ecosystems: A review. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(2): 699-711] |
[89] | Meyer-Rochow VB. Glowworms: A review of Arachnocampa spp. and kin. Luminescence, 2007, 22: 251-265 |
[90] | Leigh C, Reis TM, Sheldon F. High potential subsidy of dry-season aquatic fauna to consumers in riparian zones of wet-dry tropical rivers. Inland Waters, 2013, 3: 411-420 |
[91] | Collier KJ, Bury S, Gibbs M. A stable isotope study of linkages between stream and terrestrial food webs through spider predation. Freshwater Biology, 2002, 47: 1651-1659 |
[92] | Nyffeler M, Pusey BJ. Fish predation by semi-aquatic spiders: A global pattern. PLoS One, 2014, 9(6): e99459 |
[93] | Mcferran D, Cameron A, Anderson R. The distribution and status of Carabus clatratus L. (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in the West Fermanagh and Erne Lakeland environmentally sensitive area. The Irish Naturalists’ Journal, 1995, 25: 67-71 |
[94] | Hering D, Plachter H. Riparian ground beetles (Coeloptera, Carabidae) preying on aquatic invertebrates: A feeding strategy in alpine floodplains. Oecologia, 1997, 111: 261-270 |
[95] | Bastow JL, Sabo JL, Finlay JC, et al. A basal aquatic-terrestrial trophic link in rivers: Algal subsidies via shore-dwelling grasshoppers. Oecologia, 2002, 131: 261-268 |
[96] | Hutchens J, John J, Wallace J B. Ecosystem linkages between southern appalachian headwater streams and their banks: Leaf litter breakdown and invertebrate assemblages. Ecosystems, 2002, 5: 80-91 |
[97] | Nakano S, Murakami M. Reciprocal subsidies: Dynamic interdependence between terrestrial and aquatic food webs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2001, 98: 166-170 |
[98] | O’callaghan MJ, Hannah DM, Boomer I, et al. Responses to river inundation pressures control prey selection of riparian beetles. PLoS One, 2013, 8(4): e61866 |
[99] | Briers RA, Cariss HM, Geoghegan R, et al. The lateral extent of the subsidy from an upland stream to riparian lycosid spiders. Ecography, 2005, 28: 165-170 |
[100] | Benda L, Poff NL, Miller D, et al. The network dynamics hypothesis: How channel networks structure riverine habitats. BioScience, 2004, 54: 413-427 |
[101] | Framenau VW, Manderbach R, Baehr M. Riparian gravel banks of upland and lowland rivers in Victoria (south-east Australia): Arthropod community structure and life-history patterns along a longitudinal gradient. Australian Journal of Zoology, 2002, 50: 103-123 |
[102] | Johnson RR, Lowe CH. On the development of riparian ecology. First North American Riparian Conference, Tucson, AZ, USA, 1985: 112-116 |
[103] | Gerisch M, Schanowski A, Figura W, et al. Carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) as indicators of hydrological site conditions in floodplain grasslands. International Review of Hydrobiology, 2006, 91: 326-340 |
[104] | Gallardo B, Gascon S, Gonzalez-Sanchis M, et al. Modelling the response of floodplain aquatic assemblages across the lateral hydrological connectivity gradient. Marine and Freshwater Research, 2009, 60: 924-935 |
[105] | Danehy RJ, Kirpes BJ. Relative humidity gradients across riparian areas in eastern Oregon and Washington forests. Northwest Science, 2000, 74: 224-233 |
[106] | Gergs R, Koester M, Schulz RS, et al. Potential altera-tion of cross-ecosystem resource subsidies by an invasive aquatic macroinvertebrate: Implications for the terrestrial food web. Freshwater Biology, 2014, 59: 2645-2655 |
[107] | Burdon FJ, Harding JS. The linkage between riparian predators and aquatic insects across a stream-resource spectrum. Freshwater Biology, 2008, 53: 330-346 |
[108] | Power M, Rainey W. Food webs and resource sheds: Towards spatially delimiting trophic interactions// Hutchings MJ, John EA, Stewart AJA, eds. Ecological Consequences of Habitat Heterogeneity. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science, 2000: 291-314 |
[109] | Kato C, Iwata T, Wada E. Prey use by web-building spiders: Stable isotope analyses of trophic flow at a forest-stream ecotone. Ecological Research, 2004, 19: 633-643 |
[110] | King NR. Riparian Invertebrate Predator Communities and Cross Ecosystem Subsidies along a Stream Size Gradient. Master Thesis. Lewisberg, Germany: Bucknell University, 2014 |
No related articles found! |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||