生态系统价值在政策制度设计中的应用——以福州市为例

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.006

应用生态学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (11): 3815-3823.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.006

• 生态系统服务与生态产品价值核算专栏 • 上一篇下一篇

生态系统价值在政策制度设计中的应用——以福州市为例

尹岩¹,郗凤明^1*,王娇月¹,邴龙飞¹,杜立宇²

¹中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所, 沈阳 110016;
²沈阳农业大学土地与环境学院, 沈阳 110866

出版日期:2021-11-15 发布日期:2022-05-15
通讯作者: *E-mail: xifengming@iae.ac.cn
作者简介:尹岩, 女, 1986年生, 博士研究生, 助理研究员。主要从事农业环境与生态领域研究。E-mail:yinyan@iae.ac.cn
基金资助:
本文由福州市生态系统价值核算科研服务项目([350100]HH[CS]2019001)、辽宁省自然科学基金项目(2021-MS-025)、辽宁省博士科研启动基金指导计划项目(20170520302)、沈阳市社会科学课题重点课题(SYSK2020-35-01)、国家自然科学基金项目(41977290)、中国科学院青年创新促进会优秀会员项目(Y202050)和中国科学院青年创新促进会会员项目(2020201)资助

Application of ecosystem value in policy system design: A case study of Fuzhou City, China

YIN Yan¹, XI Feng-ming^1*, WANG Jiao-yue¹, BING Long-fei¹, DU Li-yu²

¹Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;
²Department of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China

Online:2021-11-15 Published:2022-05-15
Supported by:
This work was supported by the Scientific Research Service Project of Fuzhou City Ecosystem Value Accounting ([350100]HH[CS]2019001), the Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (2021-MS-025),the Doctoral Start-up Foundation of Liaoning Province (20170520302), the Key Project of Shenyang Social Science (SYSK2020-35-01), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41977290), the Excellent Member Project of Youth Innovation Promotion Association, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Y202050), and the Member Project of Youth Innovation Promotion Association, Chinese Academy of Sciences (2020201).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在探索生态系统价值可复制、可推广、可示范的核算模式的基础上,如何合理应用生态系统价值核算结果、形成生态系统价值政策制度应用体系、促进生态系统服务价值由“核算值”向“政策点”转化是目前亟待解决的问题。本研究以福州市经济生态生产总值(GEEP)和生态系统生产总值(GEP)核算为切入点,对GEEP进行指标筛选,并计算绿金指数和单位面积价值量,分析其在政策制度设计中的应用模式。结果表明: 污染物吸收量、物种保育更新能值、湿地重度威胁面积占比、空气负氧离子释放量、耕地占用率、海洋围填海面积占比、固碳量、释氧量、草地覆盖变化率、海岸防护面积、固体废弃物环境退化成本是显著影响福州市GEEP核算结果的指标;福州市2015和2018年绿金指数分别为1.59和1.23,均高于全国水平;福州市各生态系统单位面积价值量大小依次为湿地生态系统＞森林生态系统＞农田生态系统＞草地生态系统＞海洋生态系统。基于福州市GEEP影响因素和绿金指数、单位面积价值量,本研究构建了福州市生态系统价值核算结果“进决策、进规划、进考核、进监测”的管理制度和模式,为我国形成助推生态文明建设的长效机理机制提供了理论依据。

关键词: 生态系统价值, 价值应用, “四进”制度, 指标筛选, 指标衍生

Abstract: On the basis of exploring the replicable, popularized and demonstrative accounting model of ecosystem value, it is critically needed to solve how to reasonably apply the accounting results of ecosystem value, form the application system of ecosystem value policy system, and promote the transformation of ecosystem service value from “accounting value” to “policy point”. With the accounting of Fuzhou Gross Economic Ecological Product (GEEP) and Gross Ecosystem Product (GEP) as the starting point, we screened GEEP for indicators, calculated the green gold index and GEP per unit area, and analyzed the application mode in the policy and system design. The results showed that pollutant absorption, species conservation renewal energy values, wetland severe threat area proportion, air negative oxygen ions released volume, arable land occupancy rate, marine reclamation area proportion, carbon fixation quantity, oxygen release quantity, grassland cover change rate, coast protection area and environmental degradation cost of solid waste were the indicators significantly affecting the GEEP accounting results. The green gold index of Fuzhou City in 2015 and 2018 were 1.59 and 1.23, respectively, higher than that at the whole country level. The trends of GEP per unit area followed an order of wetland ecosystem> forest ecosystem> farmland ecosystem> grassland ecosystem> marine ecosystem. Based on the influencing factors of GEEP, green gold index and GEP per unit area, the management system and mode of “entering decision-making, planning, assessment and monitoring” of ecosystem values accounting results were constructed, which would provide a theoretical basis for the formation of a long-term mechanism for promoting the construction of ecological civilization in China.

Key words: ecosystem value, value application, “four advances” system, index screening, index derivative.

尹岩,郗凤明,王娇月,邴龙飞,杜立宇. 生态系统价值在政策制度设计中的应用——以福州市为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(11): 3815-3823.

YIN Yan, XI Feng-ming, WANG Jiao-yue, BING Long-fei, DU Li-yu. Application of ecosystem value in policy system design: A case study of Fuzhou City, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(11): 3815-3823.

参考文献 39

[1]	向欣. 江苏省生态文明综合评价与提升路径研究.硕士论文. 北京: 中国矿业大学, 2019 [Xiang X. Study on Comprehensive Evaluation and Promotion Path of Ecological Civilization in Jiangsu Province. Master Thesis. Beijing: China University of Mining and Technology, 2019]
[2]	Zhang M, Liu YM, Wu J, et al. Index system of urban resource and environment carrying capacity based on ecological civilization. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2018, 68: 90-97
[3]	Foster JB. The earth-system crisis and ecological civilization: A Marxian view. International Critical Thought, 2017, doi: 10.1080/21598282.2017.1357483
[4]	刘耕源,何萍,王永阳. 农业生态产品及其价值实现路径. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(2): 737-749 [Liu G-Y, He P, Wang Y-Y. Agro-ecological product and its value realization pathway. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(2): 737-749]
[5]	Gretchen D, John PM, Joshua R, et al. Nature’s Ser-vices: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington DC: Island Press, 1997
[6]	Costanza R, D’arge R, De Groot R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, 387: 253-260
[7]	欧阳志云,朱春全,杨广斌,等. 生态系统生产总值核算:概念、核算方法与案例研究. 生态学报, 2013, 33(21): 6747-6761 [Ouyang Z-Y, Zhu C-Q, Yang G-B, et al. Gross ecosystem product: Concept, accounting framework and case study. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(21): 6747-6761]
[8]	Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well Being: Synthesis. Washington DC: Island Press, 2005
[9]	Lars H, Kenneth JB, Carl O, et al. Progress in natural capital accounting for ecosystems. Science, 2020, 367: 514-515
[10]	王金南, 於方, 曹东. 中国绿色国民经济核算研究报告2004. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2006, 16(6): 11-17 [Wang J-N, Yu F, Cao D. Study report 2004 for green national economic accounting. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2006, 16(6): 11-17]
[11]	靳乐山, 刘晋宏, 孔德帅. 将GEP纳入生态补偿绩效考核评估分析. 生态学报, 2019, 39(1): 24-36 [Jin L-S, Liu J-H, Kong D-S. Evaluation of the incorporation of gross ecosystem product into performance appraisals for ecological compensation. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(1): 24-36]
[12]	宋昌素, 欧阳志云. 面向生态效益评估的生态系统生产总值GEP核算研究——以青海省为例. 生态学报, 2020, 40(10): 3207-3217 [Song C-S, Ouyang Z-Y. Gross ecosystem product accounting for ecological benefits assessment: A case study of Qinghai Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(10): 3207-3217]
[13]	马国霞, 於方, 王金南, 等. 中国2015年陆地生态系统生产总值核算研究. 中国环境科学, 2017, 37(4): 1474-1482 [Ma G-X, Yu F, Wang J-N, et al. Measuring gross ecosystem product (GEP) of 2015 for terrestrial ecosystems in China. China Environmental Science, 2017, 37(4): 1474-1482]
[14]	高敏雪. 生态系统生产总值的内涵、核算框架与实施条件——统计视角下的设计与论证. 生态学报, 2020, 40(2): 402-415 [Gao M-X. The connotation, accounting framework, and implementation conditions of the gross ecosystem product: Design and argumentation from the perspective of statistics. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(2): 402-415]
[15]	马国霞, 赵学涛, 吴琼, 等. 生态系统生产总值核算概念界定和体系构建. 资源科学, 2015, 37(9): 1709-1715 [Ma G-X, Zhao X-T, Wu Q, et al. Concept definition and system construction of gross ecosystem production. Resources Science, 2015, 37(9): 1709-1715]
[16]	Ouyang F, Su W, Zhang Y, et al. Ecological control service of the predatory natural enemy and its maintaining mechanism in rotation-intercropping ecosystem via wheat-maize-cotton. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2020, 301, doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2020.107024
[17]	白马卓嘎, 肖燚, 欧阳志云, 等. 甘孜藏族自治州生态系统生产总值核酸研究. 生态学报, 2017, 37(19): 6302-6312 [Pema D, Xiao Y, Ouyang Z-Y, et al. Gross ecosystem product accounting for the Garzê Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(19): 6302-6312]
[18]	董天, 张路, 肖燚, 等. 鄂尔多斯市生态资产和生态系统生产总值评估. 生态学报, 2019, 39(9): 3062-3074 [Dong T, Zhang L, Xiao Y, et al. Assessment of ecological assets and gross ecosystem product value in Ordos City. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(9): 3062-3074]
[19]	白杨, 李晖, 王晓媛, 等. 云南省生态资产与生态系统生产总值核算体系研究. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(7): 1100-1112 [Bai Y, Li H, Wang X-Y, et al. Evaluating natural resource assets and gross ecosystem products using ecological accounting system: A case study in Yunnan Province. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017, 32(7): 1100-1112]
[20]	中华人民共和国中央人民政府. 中共中央办公厅国务院办公厅印发《关于设立统一规范的国家生态文明试验区的意见》及《国家生态文明试验区(福建)实施方案》[EB/OL]. (2016-08-22) [2021-07-02]. http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2016/content_51-09307.htm [Central People’s Government of the People’s Republic of China. The General Office of the CPC Central Committee and the General Office of the State Council Issued the Opinions on the Establishment of a Unified and Standardized National Ecological Civilization Pilot Zone and the Implementation Plan of the National Pilot Ecological Civilization Pilot Zone (Fujian) [EB/OL]. (2016-08-22) [2021-07-02]. http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2016/content_5109307.htm]
[21]	张林波, 虞慧怡, 郝超志, 等. 国内外生态产品价值实现的实践模式与路径. 环境科学研究, 2021,34(6): 1407-1416 [Zhang L-B, Yu H-Y, Hao C-Z, et al. Practice model and path of ecosystem product value realization. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2021, 34(6): 1407-1416]
[22]	周宏春. 生态价值核算回顾与评价. 中国生态文明, 2016(6): 54-61 [Zhou H-C. Review and evaluation of ecological value accounting. China Ecological Civilization, 2016(6): 54-61]
[23]	孔含笑, 沈镭, 钟帅, 等. 关于自然资源核算的研究进展与争议问题. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(3): 363-376 [Kong H-X, Shen L, Zhong S, et al. Research of progress and controversial issues of natural resources accounting. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(3): 363-376]
[24]	张萌. 国外生态系统价值核算的进展与借鉴——以澳大利亚、加拿大为例. 资源导刊, 2020(11): 54-65 [Zhang M. Progress and reference of foreign ecosystem value accounting: Take Australia and Canada for example. Resource Guide, 2020(11): 54-65]
[25]	杨渺, 肖燚, 欧阳志云, 等. 四川省生态系统生产总值(GEP)的调节服务价值核算. 西南民族大学学报:自然科学版, 2019, 45(3): 221-232 [Yang M, Xiao Y, Ouyang Z-Y, et al. Ecosystem regulation services accounting of gross ecosystem product (GEP) in Sichuan Province. Journal of Southwest Minzu University: Natural Science, 2019, 45(3): 221-232]
[26]	博文静, 肖燚, 王莉雁, 等. 生态资产核算及变化特征评估——以内蒙古兴安盟为例. 生态学报, 2019, 39(15): 5425-5432 [Bo W-J, Xiao Y, Wang L-Y, et al. Assessment of the status of ecological assets and varia-tion of its characteristics: A case study of Hinggan League, Inner Mongolia. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(15): 5425-5432]
[27]	杜倩倩, 张瑞红, 马本. 生态系统服务价值估算与生态补偿机制研究——以北京市怀柔区为例. 生态经济, 2017, 33(11): 146-152 [Du Q-Q, Zhang R-H, Ma B. Study on service values of ecosystem evaluation and ecological compensation mechanism: Taking Huai-rou District of Beijing as an example. Ecological Economy, 2017, 33(11): 146-152]
[28]	王金南, 马国霞, 於方, 等. 2015年中国经济-生态生产总值核算研究. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2018, 28(2): 1-7 [Wang J-N, Ma G-X, Yu F, et al. Study on China’s gross economic-ecological product accounting in 2015. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2018, 28(2): 1-7]
[29]	贾万敬, 何建敏. 主成分分析和因子分析在评价区域经济发展水平中的应用. 现代管理科学, 2007(9): 19-21 [Jia W-J, He J-M. Application of main component analysis and factor analysis in evaluating the level of regional economic development. Modern Management Science, 2007(9): 19-21]
[30]	福州市统计局. 福州市统计年鉴 [EB/OL]. (2020-12-25) [2020-12-25].http://tjj.fuzhou.gov.cn/ [Fuzhou Bureau of Statistics. Fuzhou City Statistical Yearbook [EB/OL]. (2020-12-25) [2020-12-25]. http://tjj.fuzhou.gov.cn/]
[31]	程翠云, 葛察忠, 杜艳春, 等. 浙江省衢州市绿金指数核算研究. 生态学报, 2019, 39(1): 37-44 [Cheng C-Y, Ge C-Z, Du Y-C, et al. Green gold index accounting for Quzhou City in Zhejiang Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(1): 37-44]
[32]	王莉雁, 肖燚, 欧阳志云, 等. 国家级重点生态功能区县生态系统生产总值核算研究——以阿尔山市为例. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2017, 27(3): 146-154 [Wang L-Y, Xiao Y, Ouyang Z-Y, et al. Gross ecosystem product accounting in the national key ecological function area: An example of Arxan. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2017, 27(3): 146-154]
[33]	王金南, 於方, 马国霞, 等. 中国经济生态生产总值核算报告. 北京: 中国环境出版集团, 2019 [Wang J-N, Yu F, Ma G-X, et al. Report on Gross Economic-Ecological Product Accounting Research in China. Beijing: China Environment Publishing Group, 2019]
[34]	吴平. 完善生态补偿制度实现绿色发展. 中国财政, 2017(12): 39-40 [Wu P. Improvement of the ecological compensation system and realization of green deve-lopment. Chinese Finance, 2017(12): 39-40]
[35]	张修玉, 肖敏志, 植江瑜, 等. 科学编制自然资源资产负债表[EB/OL]. (2017-04-11) [2021-07-02]. http://epaper.cenews.com.cn/html/2017-04/11/content_58375.htm [Zhang X-Y, Xiao M-Z, Zhi J-Y, et al. Scientific Preparation of the Natural Resources Balance Sheet [EB/OL]. (2017-04-11) [2021-07-02]. http://epaper.cenews.com.cn/html/2017-04/11/content_58375.htm]
[36]	薛杨, 杨众养, 王小燕, 等. 海南省红树林湿地生态系统服务功能价值评估. 亚热带农业研究, 2014, 10(1): 41-47 [Xue Y, Yang Z-Y, Wang X-Y, et al. Mangrove ecosystem service function value assessment in Hainan Province. Subtropical Agriculture Research, 2014, 10(1): 41-47]
[37]	Daily G. Nature’s Service: Societal Dependence on Na-tural Ecosystems. Washington DC: Island Press, 1997
[38]	杨发庭. 以生态问责为抓手推进生态文明建设. 智慧中国, 2017(6): 34-36 [Yang F-T. Promotion ecological progress with ecological accountability. China Smart, 2017(6): 34-36]
[39]	兰州市生态环境局. 生态环境部印发《生态保护红线监管指标体系(试行)》. [EB/OL]. (2020-11-24) [2021-07-02]. http://sthjj.lanzhou.gov.cn/art/2020/11/24/art_5845_948499.html [Lanzhou Ecology and Environment Bureau. The Ministry of Ecology and Environment Issued the Supervision Indicator System for the Red Line for Ecological Protection (Trial) [EB/OL]. (2020-11-24) [2021-07-02]. http://sthjj.lanzhou.gov.cn/art/2020/11/24/art_5845_948499.html]

生态系统价值在政策制度设计中的应用——以福州市为例

Application of ecosystem value in policy system design: A case study of Fuzhou City, China

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 39

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价