欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 835-845.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202303.004

• 综合评述 • 上一篇    下一篇

生物多样性关键区域的理论框架、指标体系与应用实践

叶鹏程1, 刘灿2, 王爱华3, 武建勇1*, 赵晓1, 陈慧1, 斯琴1   

  1. 1生态环境部南京环境科学研究所, 国家环境保护生物多样性与生物安全重点实验室/国家环境保护武夷山生态环境科学观测研究站, 南京 210042;
    2仙居国家公园管理委员会, 浙江仙居 317300;
    3生态环境部对外合作与交流中心, 北京100035
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-23 接受日期:2022-12-29 发布日期:2023-09-15
  • 通讯作者: *E-mail: wujy10@hotmail.com
  • 作者简介:叶鹏程, 男, 1996年生, 助理研究员。主要从事生物多样性保护、生物地理学和景观生态学研究。E-mail: yepcnies@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    生态环境部“生物多样性调查、观测和评估”项目(2019HJ2096001006)、生态环境部生物多样性保护重大工程项目(ZXBSYF202005069)和全球环境基金(GEF)中国保护地管理改革规划型项目之国家公园体制机制创新项目(C-PAR1)

Theoretical framework, indicator system and practical application of key biodiversity areas.

YE Pengcheng1, LIU Can2, WANG Aihua3, WU Jianyong1*, ZHAO Xiao1, CHEN Hui1, SI Qin1   

  1. 1State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory on Biodiversity and Biosafty/State Environmental Protection Scientific Observation and Research Station for Ecological Environment of Wuyi Mountains, Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Nanjing 210042, China;
    2Management Committee of Xianju National Park, Xianju 317300, Zhejiang, China;
    3Foreign Environmental Cooperation Center, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Beijing 100035, China
  • Received:2022-11-23 Accepted:2022-12-29 Published:2023-09-15

摘要: 全球物种多样性的不断下降使得生物多样性保护愈发受到当今国际社会的广泛关注和重视。为了减缓生物多样性持续下降这一趋势,确定对生物多样性保护具有重要意义的区域就显得格外重要。然而,目前现有的识别重要区域的研究方法多具有不同的评估标准,而且多集中于不同的生物组合(物种或群落)和生态系统类型。生物多样性关键区域(KBAs)是指对全球生物多样性可持续性做出重大贡献的区域,与传统的研究识别方法不同,KBAs识别是以全球统一的标准,识别对陆地、淡水和海洋生态系统中的濒危动植物至关重要的栖息地。本文在阐述KBAs理论框架与技术架构的基础之上,总结了生物多样性关键区域的识别标准与评估参数体系,包括5项一级标准、11项二级标准以及11项评估参数。其中,涉及到生态系统层面的评估参数1项、物种层面的评估参数8项、基因层面的评估参数1项、综合评估参数1项。还结合国内外的相关研究案例分析了KBAs识别在生物多样性研究与保护中的应用,探讨了该方法在我国的发展方向和应用前景,以期为我国今后生态保护政策的制定和自然保护地的规划提供一个新视角。

关键词: 生态保护红线, 指标体系, 生物多样性关键区域, 保护优先区, 系统保护规划

Abstract: With the continuous decline of global biodiversity, biodiversity conservation has attracted more and more attention from the international society. In order to slow down the trend of biodiversity decline, it is particularly important to identify key areas for biodiversity conservation. However, most of current methods for identifying important areas have different assessment criteria and focus on different biological assemblages (species or communities) and ecosystem types. Key biodiversity areas (KBAs) are sites that contribute significantly to global biodiversity persistence. Unlike traditional research and identification methods, KBAs identification is based on a unified global standard to explore habitats that are critical to endangered plants and animals in terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems. Based on the theoretical and technical framework of KBAs, we summarized the system of identification criteria and assessment parameters for KBAs. The five high-level criteria are separated into eleven sub-level criteria. Among the eleven evaluation parameters, there is one evaluation parameter for the ecosystem level, eight evaluation parameters for the species level, one evaluation parameter for the gene level, and one comprehensive evaluation parameter. In addition, we analyzed the application of KBAs identification in biodiversity research and conservation combined with relevant domestic and foreign research cases. Furthermore, we discussed the future development direction and application prospect of KBAs identification method in China. This method could provide a new perspective for the formulation of ecological protection policies and the planning of naturally protected areas in China.

Key words: ecological conservation red line, indicator system, key biodiversity areas, priority conservation areas, systematic conservation planning