欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (7): 2006-2016.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202307.019

• 综合评述 • 上一篇    

城市绿色空间公平研究: 缘起、进展与启示

陈阳1, 荆欣1, 马仁锋2, 王雪琪1, 李冠1*   

  1. 1宁波大学公共管理系, 浙江宁波 315211;
    2宁波大学地理与空间信息技术系, 浙江宁波 315211
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-19 接受日期:2023-03-26 出版日期:2023-07-15 发布日期:2024-01-15
  • 通讯作者: *E-mail: liguan@nbu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:陈 阳, 男, 1989年生, 博士, 讲师。主要从事绿色公平治理研究。E-mail: herochen945@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省高校重大人文社科攻关计划项目(2023QN028)、浙江省自然科学基金项目(LQ23D010004)和浙江省属高校基本科研业务费项目(SJWY2022006)

Study on the equity of urban green space: Origin, progress, and enlightenment

CHEN Yang1, JING Xin1, MA Renfeng2, WANG Xueqi1, LI Guan1*   

  1. 1Department of Public Affairs, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, Zhejiang, China;
    2Department of Geography and Spatial Information Techniques, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, Zhejiang, China
  • Received:2022-12-19 Accepted:2023-03-26 Online:2023-07-15 Published:2024-01-15

摘要: 城市绿色空间公平聚焦不同社会群体能否平等共享绿色福祉,是环境正义领域的重要议题。本文系统梳理了绿色空间公平的起源和发展,探讨其概念内涵、测度技术、现象、机制和调控等多维进展,并提出研究深化的启示。绿色空间公平研究源于环保社会运动和环境正义研究,经历了话题收敛与理论演绎的多层次演进。绿色空间公平内涵多元,但分配平等是核心;绿色空间公平测度形成了成熟的技术框架,其空间尺度问题是关键;由于中西方城市特质、发展阶段、制度背景等差异,绿色空间公平现象特征和影响机制有所差异;对绿色空间公平的调控可归纳为绿色分配公平、社会承认正义、程序正义导向3类对策。未来可以从绿色空间公平的多层次实践逻辑、精细化测度技术、中国化机制解释、差异化对策仿真等方面深化研究。社会发展赋予绿色空间公平更多的现实任务与理论逻辑,迫切要求厘清绿色空间公平研究进展,支撑研究深化。

关键词: 绿色空间, 公平, 环境正义, 城市生态, 进展

Abstract: Urban green space equity focuses on whether different social groups can equally share the well-being from green space, which is an important issue in the realm of environmental justice. We systematically introduced the origin and development of green space equity, explored its multidimensional progress in conceptual connotation, measurement methodology, phenomenon, mechanism, and regulation, and proposed the enlightenment for deepening the related studies. The green space equity originated from environmental social movement and environmental justice studies, and experienced multilevel evolution in topic constriction and theoretical interpretation. Although the connotation of green space equity was interpreted from various perspectives, its core idea was distributional equality. There was a frequently-used framework for measurement methodology of green space equity, whose spatial scale issue was critical. Due to the differences of characteristics, developmental stages, and institutional backgrounds between Chinese and Western cities, the phenomena and driving mechanisms of green space equity were different. The regulation strategies of green space equity could be summarized into three types, including green distributional equitable strategy, social recognitional justice strategy, and procedural justice orientated strategy. Future studies should deepen the research from the hierarchical logics for practice management, the fine-scale measurement methodology, the interpretation of mechanism for green space inequity in Chinese context, and simulation of differentiated regulation strategies. Social development endows green space equity with more practical tasks and theoretical logics, which is urgent to clarify the research progress to support the future research.

Key words: green space, equity, environmental justice, urban ecology, progress