褐飞虱与白背飞虱若虫间的互作效应

应用生态学报 ›› 1998, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (3): 277-280.

褐飞虱与白背飞虱若虫间的互作效应

王荣富¹, 邹运鼎¹, 程遐年²

1. 安徽农业大学生物工程系, 合肥230036;
2. 南京农业大学病虫监测与治理农业部重点开放实验室, 南京210095

收稿日期:1997-12-22 修回日期:1998-03-12 出版日期:1998-05-25 发布日期:1998-05-25
基金资助:
国家“九五”重点科技攻关项目(962005201201206);江苏省“九五”重点科技攻关项目(B G965132-1)

Interactive effect between Nilaparvata lugens and Sogatella furcifera nymphae

Wang Rongfu¹, Zou Yunding¹, Cheng Xianian²

1. Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036;
2. The Key Laboratory of Monitoring and Management of Plant Diseases and Insects of Chinese Ministry of A griculture, Nanjing Agricultu ral University, Nanjing 210095

Received:1997-12-22 Revised:1998-03-12 Online:1998-05-25 Published:1998-05-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 用罩笼试验方法,研究了褐飞虱和白背飞虱若虫间的互作关系。结果表明,两种飞虱若虫间存在程度不同的相互作用过程。褐飞虱或白背飞虱的羽化、性别、翅型、雌虫体长和体重等生物学特性的表现都受到来自异种飞虱存在的影响。随褐飞虱比例的增加,白背飞虱的上述反应愈趋明显;反之,随白背飞虱比例的增加,褐飞虱则少有这种变化。种间密度制约效应远大于种内密度制约效应,表明两种飞虱诸种生物学特性对种间作用的反应存在着差异。

关键词: 褐飞虱, 白背飞虱, 若虫, 互作效应

Abstract: Nylon net method was used to study the interactive effect between Nilaparvata lugens and Sogatella furcifera nymphae. The result shows that an interactive process was existed in different degrees between these two kinds of nympha. The expression of biological characteristics of the two planthoppers, such as emergence, sex, wing form, female's body length and weight, was affected in some degrees by the existence of each other. With an increasing proportion of N. lugens, the expression mentioned above of S. furcifera became more obvious, and vice versa, that of N. lugens was little. The effect of interspecific density was far greater than that of intraspecies, indicating that there existed a difference to the interspecific reaction between the biological characteristics of the two planthoppers.

Key words: Nilaparvata lugens, Sogatella furcifera, Nympha, Interactive effect

王荣富, 邹运鼎, 程遐年. 褐飞虱与白背飞虱若虫间的互作效应[J]. 应用生态学报, 1998, 9(3): 277-280.

Wang Rongfu, Zou Yunding, Cheng Xianian. Interactive effect between Nilaparvata lugens and Sogatella furcifera nymphae[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 1998, 9(3): 277-280.

[1]	逯永清, 代阳, 于秀英, 于福兰, 江守林, 周宗元, 陈法军. CO₂浓度倍增影响转Bt水稻非靶标害虫褐飞虱的生长发育及取食行为 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(2): 651-658.
[2]	郑许松, 田俊策, 钟列权, 徐红星, 吕仲贤. “秕谷草-伪褐飞虱-中华淡翅盲蝽”载体植物系统的可行性 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(3): 941-946.
[3]	李向冬1,2,杨亚军1,田俊策1,徐红星1,郑许松1,吕仲贤1,2**. 转Bt基因及其亲本水稻上褐飞虱对三唑磷和溴氰菊酯的反应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(10): 3006-3010.
[4]	杨洪,王召,金道超**. 氯虫苯甲酰胺对非靶标害虫褐飞虱实验种群的亚致死效应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(2): 549-555.
[5]	陈燕1,吴碧球2,黄所生2,黄凤宽2**,凌炎2,龙丽萍2,3. 中国南宁和越南褐飞虱不同地理种群比较 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(1): 190-196.
[6]	隋贺,李志毅,徐艳博,韩超,韩兰芝,陈法军. 广西兴安转Bt水稻大田两迁害虫发生动态 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(11): 3021-3025.
[7]	卢海燕, 刘芳, 祝树德, 张青. 印楝素对褐飞虱诱导的水稻植株挥发物释放的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21(01): 197-202.
[8]	王翠花;翟保平;包云轩. “海棠”台风气流场对褐飞虱北迁路径的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(10): 2506-2512.
[9]	. 水氮互作对小麦土壤水分利用和茎中果聚糖含量的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(08): 1876-1882.
[10]	吴碧球;黄凤宽;黄所生;龙丽萍;韦素美. 水稻品种抗褐飞虱不同生物型的稳定性 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(06): 1477-1482 .
[11]	庞贞武;师瑞红;谢国生;刘铁梅;柯文峰;蔡明历. 铝、硒、硅和磷复合处理对水稻幼苗生长的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(06): 1375-1382 .
[12]	郑许松¹;陈桂华²;徐红星¹;吕仲贤¹. 温度和氮肥对褐飞虱存活、生长发育和繁殖的交互作用 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(05): 1171-1175 .
[13]	刘光杰¹;寒川一成²;陈仕高³;蒲正国³;沈君辉¹;石敦贵³;谯青春³;刘祥贵⁴. 水稻害虫的可持续治理及经济效益评估 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2006, 17(10): 1941-1947 .
[14]	沈君辉, 李平, 刘光杰. 运用电子记录技术检测白背飞虱田间种群致害性 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(6): 1090-1094.
[15]	何华勤, 沈荔花, 宋碧清, 郭玉春, 梁义元, 梁康迳, 林文雄. 几种化感物质替代物间的互作效应分析 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(5): 890-894.