欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

三种Ts/VI指数在UCLA土壤湿度降尺度法中的效果评价

凌自苇1,何龙斌1,曾辉1,2**   

  1. 1北京大学深圳研究生院城市规划与设计学院, 广东深圳 518055; 2北京大学城市与环境学院生态学系, 北京 100871)
  • 出版日期:2014-02-18 发布日期:2014-02-18

Evaluating the performance of the UCLA method for spatially downscaling soil moisture products using three Ts/VI indices.

LING Zi-wei1, HE Long-bin1, ZENG Hui1,2   

  1. (1School of Urban Planning and Design, Shenzhen Graduate School, Peking University, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China; 2Department of Ecology, College of Urban & Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)
  • Online:2014-02-18 Published:2014-02-18

摘要:

微波遥感土壤湿度产品是目前在大尺度水资源或气候变化研究中比较常用的地表土壤湿度数据,但其空间分辨率一般都较粗,不能满足区域或流域尺度相关研究要求.因而,在这些尺度的相关研究中需要对土壤湿度产品进行空间降尺度.UCLA法是一种土壤湿度降尺度方法,该方法使用地表温度和植被指数特征空间指数(Ts/VI指数)作为降尺度因子.本文以AMSRE土壤湿度产品作为土壤湿度粗分辨率数据,使用MODIS地表温度产品(MYD11A1)和植被指数产品(MYD13A2)计算3种指数——土壤湿度指数(SW)、温度植被干旱指数(TVDI)和条件温度植被指数(VTCI),对比了3种Ts/VI指数分别作为UCLA法降尺度因子的效果.这3种指数均能得出合理的降尺度结果,但使用TVDI和VTCI的降尺度结果稍优于SW,说明TVDI和VTCI更适合作为UCLA法的降尺度因子.最后讨论了UCLA法的误差来源,如粗分辨率土壤湿度产品的测量误差、降尺度因子的计算误差以及UCLA法自身的误差,并对未来的研究做出展望.
 

Abstract: Soil moisture products derived from microwave remote sensing data are commonly used in the studies of large-scale water resources or climate change. However, the spatial resolutions of these products are usually too coarse to be used in regional  or watershedscale studies. Therefore, it is necessary to spatially downscale the coarseresolution soil moisture products for use in regional or watershedscale studies. The UCLA method is one of the methods for spatially downscaling soil moisture products. In this method, the spatial indices (Ts/VI indices) calculated from land surface temperature and vegetation index are used as auxiliary variables for spatial downscaling. In this paper, we compared the performance of the UCLA method for spatially downscaling the coarseresolution AMSR-E soil moisture products, using three Ts/VI indices as auxiliary variables, i.e., the soil wetness index (SW), temperature vegetation dryness index (TVDI), and vegetation temperature condition index (VTCI). These auxiliary variables were calculated from the products of MODIS land surface temperature (MYD11A1) and MODIS vegetation index (MYD13A2). The downscaled results using the three Ts/VI indices were all reasonable. However, the downscaled results using TVDI and VTCI were better than using SW. Therefore, we concluded that TVDI and VTCI are more suitable than SW to be used as the auxiliary variable when applying the UCLA method for downscaling soil moisture products. Finally, we discussed the error sources of applying the UCLA method, such as measurement errors of coarse resolution soil products, calculation errors from spatial indices, and errors from the UCLA method itself, and we also discussed the potential improvements of future research.