欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

神农架自然保护区森林生态系统服务价值评估

刘永杰1,2,王世畅1,彭皓1,3,李镇清1**   

  1. 1中国科学院植物研究所植被与环境变化国家重点实验室, 北京 100093; 2中国科学院大学, 北京 100049; 3中国科学院文献情报中心, 北京 100190)
  • 出版日期:2014-05-18 发布日期:2014-05-18

Evaluation of ecosystem service values of the forests of Shennongjia Nature Reserve.

LIU Yong-jie1,2, WANG Shi-chang1, PENG Hao1,3, LI Zhen-qing1   

  1. (1State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China; 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China)
  • Online:2014-05-18 Published:2014-05-18

摘要:

神农架自然保护区是以亚热带森林生态系统和珍稀动植物为主要保护对象的自然保护区,对中国的生物多样性研究有重要意义.应用市场价值、影子价格、机会成本等方法,对神农架自然保护区提供林产品、涵养水源、土壤保持、气体调节、净化环境、养分循环、娱乐文化和维持生物多样性等森林生态系统功能的生态经济价值进行评估.结果表明: 神农架国家级自然保护区森林生态系统服务价值总计为204.33×108 元·a-1.按服务类型的价值比例从高到低排序为:生物多样性(68.5%)>土壤保持(12.7%)>娱乐文化(4.9%)>气体调节(4.8%)>林产品(4.2%)>涵养水源(3.9%)>净化环境(0.7%)>养分循环(0.3%).按利用类型划分,非使用价值(68.5%)>间接使用价值(22.4%)>直接使用价值(9.1%).

 

Abstract: As an ecological protected area for rare animals and plants in a subtropical forest zone, Shennongjia National Reserve plays an important role in the study of biodiversity in China. By using the market value, shadeprice and opportunitycost methods, the forest ecosystem service values of Shennongjia National Nature Reserve were evaluated, including forest production, recreation and culture, water conservation, soil conservation, gas regulation, environment purification, nutrient circulation and biodiversity conservation. The total value of the Shennongjia Nature Reserve was approximately 204.33×108 yuan RMB·a-1. The values of the different functions were in order of biodiversity conservation (68.5%)> soil conservation (12.7%)> recreation and culture (4.9%)>gas regulation (4.8%)>forest production (4.2%)> water conservation (3.9%)> environment purification (0.7%)>nutrient circulation (0.3%). The values with respect to utility were in sequence of unused value (68.5%)> indirect value in use (22.4%)> direct value in use (9.1%).