欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (7): 2347-2354.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201807.016

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

宁夏引黄灌区次生盐碱地紫穗槐茎干液流分析

曹琪琪, 王若水, 肖辉杰*, 杨本漫, 刘涛   

  1. 北京林业大学水土保持学院, 北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-28 出版日期:2018-07-18 发布日期:2018-07-18
  • 通讯作者: *E-mail: herr_xiao@hotmail.com
  • 作者简介:曹琪琪, 女, 1992年生, 硕士研究生. 主要从事林业生态研究. E-mail: caoqiqi1993@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    本文由北京林业大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(2017PT12)、国家林业公益性行业科研专项(201504402)和基于荒漠化防治和盐碱地改良的海藻肥施用技术项目(2016HXFWSBXY002)资助.

Sap flow of Amorpha fruticosa in the secondary saline-alkali land in Ningxia Yellow River irrigation area, China.

CAO Qi-qi, WANG Ruo-shui, XIAO Hui-jie*, YANG Ben-man, LIU Tao   

  1. School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2017-12-28 Online:2018-07-18 Published:2018-07-18
  • Contact: *E-mail: herr_xiao@hotmail.com
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Beijing Forestry University Central University Basic Research Business Expenses Special Funds Project (2017PT12), the Industry of National Public Welfare (Forestry) Scientific Research (201504402), and the Application Techniques of Algal Fertilizer Based on Desertification Control and Saline-alkali Land Improvement Project (2016HXFWSBXY002).

摘要: 于2017年5—10月采用包裹式液流测量系统,研究宁夏引黄灌区次生盐碱地不同水盐条件下不同基径紫穗槐的液流变化、耗水规律,以及环境因子对液流的影响.结果表明:晴天紫穗槐液流呈“几”字型宽峰曲线,无明显“午休”现象,多云、阴、雨天气呈不规则多峰曲线,夜间存在微弱液流;生长季(5—10月)中,基径约为13、16、22 mm紫穗槐的总液流量分别为138.14、206.06、370.11 kg,6、7月耗水较多,约占全生长季的50%,5、8月次之,9、10月较少;0.5 h和日尺度下,光合有效辐射(PAR)为影响紫穗槐液流的关键因子.第一阶段(5月13日—8月19日),浅层(0~40 cm)土壤水分对不同基径紫穗槐的液流均有显著影响,浅层土壤盐分仅对13 mm紫穗槐液流存在显著抑制作用;第二阶段(8月20日—10月10日),土壤水分、盐分对不同基径紫穗槐液流均无显著影响.综上,基径<13 mm的紫穗槐不适宜在浅层土壤电导率(EC)>2 dS·m-1的盐渍土中栽植,而基径>16 mm的植株可在浅层土壤EC为5 dS·m-1的盐渍土中正常生长,且均需在其生长旺盛期进行合理灌溉.

Abstract: From May to October in 2017, the sap flow, water consumption and the effects of environmental factors on the sap flow of Amorpha fruticosas with different stem diameters under different water and salt conditions were examined with the packaged sap flow measuring system in a secondary saline-alkali land of Ningxia Yellow River irrigation area. The sap flow rate showed a broad peak curve with no obvious phenomenon of ‘midday break’ in sunny days and a multi-peak curve in cloudy, overcast and rainy days. Weak sap flow was found at night. In the growing season (May - October), total sap flow of A. fruticosas with basal stem diameters of 13, 16 and 22 mm were 138.14, 206.06, 370.11 kg, respectively. The water consumption was largest in June and July, accounting for about 50% of the whole growing season, followed by May and August, and lowest in September and October. At both 0.5 h and day scales, photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) was the dominant meteorological factor affecting the sap flow. In the first growth stage (May 13th - August 19th), soil water in shallow layer (0-40 cm) had significant effect on the sap flow of A. fruticosas with three different diameters, and soil salt in shallow layer had significant inhibitory effect only on A. fruticosa with the diameter of 13 mm. In the second growth stage (August 20th - October 10th), soil water and soil salt had no significant effect on A. fruticosas with three different diameters. In summary, the A. fruticosas with diameters <13 mm was not suitable for planting in saline soil (electrical conductivity (EC)>2 dS·m-1), and individuals with diameters >16 mm could grow well in saline soil (EC=5 dS·m-1). Moreover, reasonable irrigation should be carried out in the vigorous growth stage of the A. fruticosas.