11种树种的树皮抗火性

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202001.020

应用生态学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 65-71.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202001.020

11种树种的树皮抗火性

王明霞^1,2,3, 单延龙^1,2,3*, 尹赛男^1,2,3, 季鑫^1,2,3, 王雅钧^1,2,3, 袁博涵^1,2,3

¹北华大学林学院, 吉林吉林 132013;
²森林草原防控技术国家创新联盟, 吉林吉林 132013;
³北方林火管理国家林草局重点实验室, 哈尔滨 150040

收稿日期:2019-09-11 出版日期:2020-01-15 发布日期:2020-01-15
通讯作者: E-mail: shanyl@163.com
作者简介:王明霞, 女, 1996年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事林火生态与管理研究。E-mail: 2247329989@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(31971669, 31470497)

Fire resistance of bark of 11 tree species

WANG Ming-xia^1,2,3, SHAN Yan-long^1,2,3*, YIN Sai-nan, JI Xin^1,2,3, WANG Ya-jun^1,2,3, YUAN Bo-han^1,2,3

¹College of Forestry, Beihua University, Jilin 132013, Jilin, China;
²National Innovation Alliance of Wildland Fire Prevention and Control Technology of China, Jilin 132013, Jilin, China;
³Northern Forest Fire Management Key Laboratory of the State Forestry and Grassland Bureau, Harbin 150040, China

Received:2019-09-11 Online:2020-01-15 Published:2020-01-15
Contact: E-mail: shanyl@163.com
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31971669, 31470497).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 我国是森林火灾较为严重的国家之一,在森林防火工作中,除加强火源管理、加大森林火灾的监测和扑救力度等手段外,提高林分自身抵抗火灾的能力也是预防森林火灾发生的关键。本研究以吉林省蛟河林业实验区管理局内红松阔叶林11种主要树种树皮为研究对象,根据含水率、灰分、热值、氧指数4个指标,使用熵权法、方差分析、聚类分析等方法对各树种树皮抗火性进行综合评价。结果表明: 黄檗树皮的含水率最高,春榆树皮的热值最低且灰分含量最大,水曲柳树皮的氧指数最高;11种树种树皮抗火性大小依次为:春榆>色木槭>拧筋槭>白牛槭>水曲柳>蒙古栎>黄檗>紫椴>胡桃楸>红松>枫桦。红松阔叶林主要树种树皮的抗火性可分为5类,春榆的抗火性强;色木槭、拧筋槭的抗火性较强;白牛槭、水曲柳、蒙古栎、黄檗、紫椴的抗火性一般;胡桃楸、红松的抗火性差;枫桦的抗火性极差。

Abstract: China is one of the countries with serious forest fires. Besides the methods of strengthening management of fire source and increasing forest fire monitoring and rescue efforts, improving the ability of forest itself to resist fire is also the key to prevent forest fires. In this study, we examined the characteristics of the bark across 11 main tree species in Korean pine broad-leaved forest at Jiaohe Forestry Experimental Area in Jilin Province. Fire resistance of bark acorss the tree species was evaluated comprehensively with four indices of water content, ash content, calorific value and oxygen index, using the methods of entropy weight, variance analysis and cluster analysis. Results showed that water content of bark was the highest in Phellodendron amurense. Calorific value of bark was the lowest and ash content was the highest in Ulmus davidiana. Oxygen index of bark was the highest in Fraxinus mandshurica. Bark fire resistance of 11 tree species followed the order of U. davidiana > Acer mono > Acer triflorum > Acer mandshuricum > F. mandshurica > Quercus mongolica > P. amurense > Tilia amurensis > Juglans mandshurica > Pinus koraiensis > Betula costata. The tree species in Korean pine broad-leaved forest could be classified to five categories according to bark fire resistance: U. davidiana belonged to the category of strongest fire-resistance; A. mono and A. triflorum belonged to the category of strong fire-resistance; A. mandshuricum, F. mandshurica, Q. mongolica, P. amurense, T. amurensis belonged to the category of common fire-resistance; J. mandshurica and P. koraiensis belonged to the category of weak fire-resistance; and B. costata belonged to the category of poor fire-resistance.

王明霞, 单延龙, 尹赛男, 季鑫, 王雅钧, 袁博涵. 11种树种的树皮抗火性[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(1): 65-71.

WANG Ming-xia, SHAN Yan-long, YIN Sai-nan, JI Xin, WANG Ya-jun, YUAN Bo-han. Fire resistance of bark of 11 tree species[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(1): 65-71.

参考文献

[1] Gruber N, Friedlingstein P, Field C, et al. The Vulnera-bility of the Carbon Cycle in the 21st Century: An Assessment of Carbon-Climate-Human Interactions. London: Island Press, 2004
[2] Westerling AL, Bryant BP. Climate change and wildfire in California. Climatic Change, 2008, 87: 231-249
[3] Mckenzie D, Shankar U, Keane RE, et al. Smoke consequences of new wildfire regimes driven by climate change. Earths Future, 2014, 2: 35-59
[4] Ying L, Han J, Du Y, et al. Forest fire characteristics in China: Spatial patterns and determinants with thre-sholds. Forest Ecology and Management, 2018, 424: 345-354
[5] 邹璐, 陶远胜, 甘继权, 等. 井冈山自然保护区16种树叶的抗火性排序. 江西农业大学学报, 2012, 34(5): 976-982 [Zou L, Tao Y-S, Gan J-Q, et al. Ordering of fire resistance of 16 leaves in Jinggangshan nature reserve. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis,2012, 34(5): 976-982]
[6] 陈存及, 何宗明, 陈东华, 等. 37种针阔树种抗火性能及其综合评价的研究. 林业科学, 1995, 31(2): 135-143 [Chen C-J, He Z-M, Chen D-H, et al. Study on fire resistance and comprehensive evaluation of 37 species of coniferous and broad-leaved trees. Scientia Silvae Sinice, 1995, 31(2): 135-143]
[7] Anderson HE. Forest fuel ignitibility. Fire Technology, 1970, 6: 312-319
[8] Ganteaume A, Jappiot M, Corinne L. Flammability of some ornamental species in wildland-urban interfaces in southeastern France: Laboratory assessment at particle level. Environmental Management, 2013, 52: 467-480
[9] Mason NWH, Frazao C, Buxton RP, et al. Fire form and function: Evidence for exaptive flammability in the New Zealand flora. Plant Ecology, 2016, 217: 645-659
[10] Molina JR, Martín T, Francisco RS, et al. The ignition index based on flammability of vegetation improves planning in the wildland-urban interface: A case study in Southern Spain. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2017, 158: 129-138
[11] 舒立福, 田晓瑞, 李红, 等. 我国亚热带若干树种的抗火性研究. 火灾科学, 2000, 9(2): 1-7 [Shu L-F, Tian X-R, Li H, et al. Studies on fire resistance forest species. Fire Safety Science, 2000, 9(2): 1-7]
[12] 梁琴, 陶建平, 邓锋, 等. 喀斯特山区9种常见树木叶片在防火期的阻火性分析. 林业科学, 2015, 51(3): 102-108 [Liang Q, Tao J-P, Deng F, et al. Fire resistance of leaves during fire prevention period of nine common tree species in Karst Mountain regions. Scientia Silvae Sinice, 2015, 51(3): 102-108]
[13] 苏文静, 张思玉, 何诚, 等. 昆明地区9种藤本植物活叶片的燃烧性. 林业资源管理, 2017(6): 120-123 [Su W-J, Zhang S-Y, He C, et al. Combustion characteristics of live leaves of 9 lianas species in Kunming, Yunnan province. Forest Resources Management, 2017(6): 120-123]
[14] 杜帅, 宋光辉, 方海滨, 等. 4种林型的早春草本植物的抗火性. 东北林业大学学报, 2018, 46(11): 58-61 [Du S, Song G-H, Fang H-B, et al. Fire resis-tance of early spring herbaceous plants under four forest types. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2018, 46(11): 58-61]
[15] 田晓瑞, 舒立福, 乔启宇, 等. 南方林区防火树种的筛选研究. 北京林业大学学报, 2001, 23(5): 43-47 [Tian X-R, Shu L-F, Qiao Q-Y, et al. Research on fire-resistance tree species in South China. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2001, 23(5): 43-47]
[16] 王宁, 王美菊, 李世兰, 等. 降水变化对红松阔叶林土壤微生物生物量生长季动态的影响. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(5): 1297-1305 [Wang N, Wang M-J, Li S-L, et al. Effects of precipitation variation on growing seasonal dynamics of soil microbial biomass in broad-leaved Korean pine mixed forest. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(5): 1297-1305]
[17] 邓守彦, 刘万德, 郭忠玲, 等. 不同恢复时期红松阔叶林群落结构与多样性特征. 林业科学研究, 2009, 22(4): 493-499 [Deng S-Y, Liu W-D, Guo Z-L, et al. Community structure and diversity of broadleaved Korean pine forests at different restoring Stages Forest Research, 2009, 22(4): 493-499]
[18] 赵丽, 单延龙, 赵景刚, 等. 吉林省发生重特大森林火灾林型的特征. 东北林业大学学报, 2013, 41(9): 80-82 [Zhao L, Shan Y-L, Zhao J-G, et al. Stand characteristics of extremely large forest fires in Jilin Province. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2013, 41(9): 80-82]
[19] 刘生冬, 孟庆繁, 高文韬, 等. 吉林蛟河阔叶红松林地表甲虫多样性时间动态分析. 生态学报, 2018, 38(7): 2462-2470 [Liu S-D, Meng Q-F, Gao W-T, et al. An analysis of temporal dynamics of litter-layer beetles in broad-leaved Korean pine forest in Jiaohe, Jilin Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(7): 2462-2470]
[20] 庞世龙, 凌福诚, 侯远瑞, 等. 基于熵权灰色关联分析的喀斯特石漠化地区植被恢复效应评价. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2019, 39(5): 70-78 [Pang S-L, Ling F-C, Hou Y-R, et al. Effect evaluation of vegetation restoration in karst rocky desertification area based on entropy-weighted grey relational analysis. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2019, 39(5): 70-78]
[21] 战明松, 朱京海. 基于生态敏感性评价的本溪青云山景区空间规划. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(7): 2352-2360 [Zhan M-S, Zhu J-H. Spatial of Qingyun mountain scenic spot in Benxi, Northeast China based on ecological sensitivity assessment. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(7): 2352-2360]
[22] 舒立福, 田晓瑞, 马林涛. 我国的森林火灾状况和对策研究. 灾害学, 1999, 14(3): 90-93 [Shu L-F, Tian X-R, Ma L-T. The status and countermeasure research of forest fire disasters in China. Journal of Catastrophology, 1999, 14(3): 90-93]
[23] 温开德, 欧阳园兰. 11种常绿阔叶树的树皮抗火性研究. 南方林业科学, 2018, 46(1): 50-53 [Wen K-D, Ouyang Y-L. Study on bark fire resistance of 11 evergreen broadleaved tree species. South China Forestry Science, 2018, 46(1): 50-53]
[24] 刘迪, 郭妍, 胡海清. 兴安落叶松树皮热量传递模型构建. 东北林业大学学报, 2018, 46(5): 38-43 [Liu D, Guo Y, Hu H-Q. Heat transmission and mortality model establishment of Larix gmelinii forest bark. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2018, 46(5): 38-43]
[25] Lavrenyuka H, Kochubeib V, Mykhalichko O, et al. A new flame retardant on the basis of diethylenetriamine copper (II) sulfate complex for combustibility suppressing of epoxy-amine composites. Fire Safety Journal, 2016, 80: 30-37.
[26] Lavrenyuk H, Kochubei V, Mykhalichko O, et al. Metal-coordinated epoxy polymers with suppressed combustibi-lity: Preparation technology, thermal degradation, and combustibility test of new epoxy-amine polymers containing the curing agent with chelated copper (Ⅱ) carbonate. Fire and Materials, 2017, 42: 266-277
[27] 单延龙, 陶洪伟, 赵丽, 等. 长白山红松阔叶林主要树种树皮抗火性的分析与排序. 东北林业大学学报, 2011, 39(12): 49-50 [Shan Y-L, Tao H-W, Zhao L, et al. Ordination of fire resistances of bark of main species in Korean pine broad-leaved forests in Changbai Mountains. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2011, 39(12): 49-50]
[28] 王立海, 孙墨珑. 小兴安岭主要树种热值与碳含量. 生态学报, 2009, 29(2): 953-959 [Wang L-H, Sun M-L. Caloric values and carbon contents of dominant trees in Xiaoxing’anling forest region. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(2): 953-959]
[29] Reardon J, Curcio G. Estimated smoldering probability: A new tool for predicting ground fire in the organic soils on the North Carolina Coastal Plain. Fire Management Today, 2011, 71: 31-35
[30] 任宪威. 树木学. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1995 [Ren X-W. Tree Science. Beijing: China Forestry Press, 1995]
[31] 解蛰, 衣晓雨, 夏富才. 东北地区槭属植物资源现状及其开发利用. 吉林林业科技, 2017, 46(1): 26-31 [Xie Z, Yi X-Y, Xia F-C. The resource situation and development utilization of Acer plants in northeast area. Journal of Jilin Forestry Science and Technology, 2017, 46(1): 26-31]
[32] 孙利军. 枫桦干燥过程中变色机理的研究. 硕士论文. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2005 [Sun L-J. Study on the Discoloration Mechanism of Betula platyphylla during Drying. Master Thesis. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2005]
[33] 梁瀛, 张思玉, 努尔古丽, 等. 天山中部林区主要树种理化性质及燃烧性分析. 林业科学, 2011, 47(12):101-105 [Liang Y, Zhang S-Y, Nu E-G-L, et al. Physical and chemical properties and combustibility of main wood species in the central part of Tianshan Mountains. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2011, 47(12): 101-105]
[34] 李克, 倪泽仁, 刘晓东, 等. 南京市5种常见树种的燃烧性研究. 西北农林科技大学学报: 自然科学版, 2020, 48(1):1-8 [Li K, Ni Z-R, Liu X-D, et al. Flammability of five common tree species in Nanjing. Journal of Northwest A & F University: Natural Science, 2020, 48(1): 1-8]
[35] 鞠琳, 胡海清, 孙龙, 等. 东北三大硬阔的阻火性能. 东北林业大学学报, 2008, 36(1): 28-30 [Ju L, Hu H-Q, Sun L. et al. Fire resistances of Juglans mandshurica, Fraxinus mandshurica and Phellodendron amurense. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2008, 36(1): 28-30]

11种树种的树皮抗火性

Fire resistance of bark of 11 tree species

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价