欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报

• 中国生态学学会2014年学术年会会议专栏 • 上一篇    下一篇

土地利用方式对黑土剖面有机碳分布及碳储量的影响

郝翔翔1,2,韩晓增1**,李禄军1,邹文秀1,陆欣春1,乔云发1   

  1. 1中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所海伦农田生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站, 哈尔滨 150081; 2中国科学院大学, 北京 100049)
  • 出版日期:2015-04-18 发布日期:2015-04-18

Profile distribution and storage of soil organic carbon in a black soil as affected by land use types.

HAO Xiang-xiang1,2, HAN Xiao-zeng1, LI Lu-jun1, ZOU Wen-xiu1, LU Xin-chun1, QIAO Yun-fa1   

  1. (1National Field Research Station of Agroecosystem in Hailun, Northest Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Harbin 150081, China; 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
  • Online:2015-04-18 Published:2015-04-18

摘要:

以典型黑土区29年长期定位试验处理下的土壤为对象,研究了农田、裸地、自然草地和落叶松林地4种土地利用方式下土壤剖面(0~200 cm)有机碳及碳储量的分布特征.结果表明: 不同土地利用方式下表层(0~10 cm)土壤有机碳含量差异最大,表现为草地>农田>林地>裸地.农田10~120 cm各土层有机碳含量均低于草地、林地和裸地.与农田相比,自然草地对土壤有机碳提升作用明显,其0~60 cm各层土壤有机碳含量均显著高于农田;裸地表层(0~10 cm)土壤有机碳含量显著低于农田;落叶松林地0~20 cm有机碳含量与农田相比无明显变化,但其20~140 cm土层有机碳含量均高于农田.土壤剖面有机碳含量与pH值、容重、粉粒和粘粒含量呈显著负相关,与全氮和砂粒含量呈显著正相关.农田0~200 cm剖面有机碳储量显著低于其他3种利用方式,分别比草地、裸地和林地低13.6%、11.4%和10.9%.农田黑土在增加碳储量及改善环境方面具有很大潜力.
 

Abstract: Taking soils in a longterm experimental field over 29 years with different land uses types, including arable land, bare land, grassland and larch forest land as test materials, the distribution and storage of soil organic carbon (SOC) in the profile (0-200 cm) in typical black soil (Mollisol) region of China were investigated. The results showed that the most significant differences in SOC content occurred in the 0-10 cm surface soil layer among all soils with the order of grassland>arable land>larch forest land>bare land. SOC contents at 10-120 cm depth were lower in arable land as compared with the other land use types. Compared with arable land, grassland could improve SOC content obviously. SOC content down to a depth of 60 cm in grassland was significantly higher than that in arable land. The content of SOC at 0-10 cm in bare land was significantly lower than that in arable land. Although there were no significant differences in SOC content at 0-20 cm depth between larch forestland and arable land, the SOC contents at 20-140 cm depth were generally higher in larch forestland than that in arable land. In general, SOC content showed a significantly negative relationship with soil pH, bulk density, silt and clay content and an even stronger significantly positive relationship with soil total N content and sand content. The SOC storage in arable land at 0-200 cm depth was significantly lower than that in the other three land use types, which was 13.6%, 11.4% and 10.9% lower than in grassland, bare land and larch forest land, respectively. Therefore, the arable land of black soil has a great potential for sequestering C in soil and improving environmental quality.