欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于回归和地理加权回归Kriging的土壤有机质空间插值

杨顺华1,张海涛1**,郭龙2,任艳1   

  1. (1华中农业大学资源与环境学院, 武汉 430070;  2武汉大学资源与环境科学学院, 武汉 430070)
  • 出版日期:2015-06-18 发布日期:2015-06-18

Spatial interpolation of soil organic matter using regression Kriging and geographically weighted regression Kriging.

YANG Shun-hua1, ZHANG Hai-tao1, GUO Long2, REN Yan1   

  1. (1College of Resource and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; 2School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430070, China)
  • Online:2015-06-18 Published:2015-06-18

摘要:

基于地形因子与土壤有机质的相关分析,选取相对高程和汇流动力指数作为辅助变量.以普通克里格(OK)作对照,比较地理加权回归克里格(GWRK)与回归克里格(RK)在土壤有机质空间插值及制图上的精度与效果.结果表明: 土壤有机质含量与相对高程呈显著正相关,与汇流动力指数呈显著负相关;经半方差分析,土壤有机质及其插值残差具有强烈的空间自相关;对验证集中98个样点的精度加以分析,RK法插值结果的平均误差(ME)、平均绝对误差(MAE)、均方根误差(RMSE)较OK法分别降低39.2%、17.7%和20.6%,相对提高度(RI)为20.63,GWRK法插值结果的ME、MAE、RMSE较OK法分别降低60.6%、23.7%、27.6%,RI为59.79.与OK相比,考虑了辅助变量的RK和GWRK明显提高了插值精度;GWRK考虑了样点位置,成图效果更加精细,对土壤有机质的局部模拟效果优于RK.

 

Abstract: Relative elevation and stream power index were selected as auxiliary variables based on correlation analysis for mapping soil organic matter. Geographically weighted regression Kriging (GWRK) and regression Kriging (RK) were used for spatial interpolation of soil organic matter and compared with ordinary Kriging (OK), which acts as a control. The results indicated that soil organic matter was significantly positively correlated with relative elevation whilst it had a significantly negative correlation with stream power index. Semivariance analysis showed that both soil organic matter content and its residuals (including ordinary least square regression residual and GWR residual) had strong spatial autocorrelation. Interpolation accuracies by different methods were estimated based on a data set of 98 validation samples. Results showed that the mean error (ME), mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE) of RK were respectively 39.2%, 17.7% and 20.6% lower than the corresponding values of OK, with a relative improvement (RI) of 20.63. GWRK showed a similar tendency, having its ME, MAE and RMSE to be respectively 60.6%, 23.7% and 27.6% lower than those of OK, with a RI of 59.79. Therefore, both RK and GWRK significantly improved the accuracy of OK interpolation of soil organic matter due to their incorporation of auxiliary variables. In addition, GWRK performed obviously better than RK did in this study, and its improved performance  should be attributed to the consideration of sample spatial locations.