欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

抽雄期前后大风倒伏对夏玉米生长及产量的影响

李树岩1**,王宇翔2,胡程达1 ,闫瑛2   

  1. (1中国气象局河南省农业气象保障与应用技术重点实验室/河南省气象科学研究所,  郑州 450003;  2南阳市气象局,  河南南阳 473000)
  • 出版日期:2015-08-18 发布日期:2015-08-18

Effects of strong wind lodging at pre and posttasseling stages on growth and yield of summer maize.

LI Shu-yan1, WANG Yu-xiang2, HU Cheng-da1, YAN Ying2   

  1. (1Henan Provincial Key Laboratory of Agrometeorological Safeguard and Applied Technique, China Meteorological Administration/Henan Institute of Meteorological Science, Zhengzhou 450003, China; 2Nanyang Meteorological Bureau, Nanyang 473000, China)
  • Online:2015-08-18 Published:2015-08-18

摘要: 利用2013年8月1日河南省南阳地区夏玉米大风倒伏灾害的调查数据,分析抽雄期前后不同类型倒伏对夏玉米生长及产量形成的影响,研究不同品种的抗倒性差异和适播期.调查对象为5个播期的浚单20和3个播期的郑单958,倒伏类型划分为根斜、根倒、茎折和折断4种.研究表明: 各品种及播期均于抽雄前~抽雄后15 d倒伏率较高.浚单20各播期的总倒伏率为86.0%~98.5%,郑单958各播期的总倒伏率为60.0%~76.4%,且播种越早的播期总倒伏率越低.浚单20倒伏发生时,播期Ⅱ~Ⅴ的夏玉米生育时期接近抽雄,以根倒类型为主,倒伏率为53.0%~84.3%,已过抽雄期的播期Ⅰ夏玉米以茎折倒伏为主,倒伏率为37.5%.倒伏发生后干物质积累显著降低,各倒伏类型对干物质积累的影响总体表现为茎折>根倒>根斜,播种越晚的总干物质积累越少.倒伏对干物质分配比例影响表现为叶片和茎杆干物质比例增大,果穗干物质比例减少.根倒和茎折两种倒伏类型使穗长显著变短,穗粗显著变细,穗粒数显著减少,抽雄后发生倒伏也会使百粒重显著降低;而根斜倒伏类型对各性状的影响均不显著.倒伏后产量损失严重,不同倒伏类型中茎折类型减产最多,浚单20和郑单958平均减产率分别为74.2%和68.7%,尤其是茎折发生在抽雄之前难以形成产量;其次是根倒,平均减产率分别为46.3%和46.5%;根斜产量损失最小,平均分别为8.4%和13.2%.大风倒伏灾害后,浚单20产量平均为4959.9 kg·hm-2,产量随播期的推迟而减少;郑单958平均为6026.1 kg·hm-2,随播期变化不明显.总体上,郑单958品种抗倒性好于浚单20.

Abstract: Surveying data for wind lodging disaster happening in Nanyang of Henan Province in August 1, 2013, were used to analyze the effects of strong wind lodging at pre and posttasseling stages on growth and yield of summer maize, and to determine the differences in lodging resistance among varieties and the suitable sowing time for summer maize. The survey included two varieties of summer maize, Xundan 20 and Zhengdan 958, with five and three sowing dates, respectively. The lodging was divided into four types, i.e., root slope (RS), root lodging (RL), stem bending (SB) and stem broken (SBK). The results showed that wind lodging occurring at pre and posttasseling stages resulted in high lodging percentages for both varieties and all sowing dates. The lodging percentage of Xundan 20 variety ranged between 86.0% and 98.5% for five sowing dates. For Zhengdan 958 variety, it ranged between 60.0% and 76.4% for three sowing dates. After tasseling, the earlier the sowing date, the lower the lodging rate occurred. The main lodging types happening around the tasseling stage were RL with the lodging rate of 53.0%-84.3% for sowing dates Ⅱ-Ⅴ of Xundan 20. The main lodging type for sowing date Ⅰwas SB with the lodging rate of 37.5%. Lodging reduced the aboveground dry matter with the greatest reduction rate occurring in SB, followed by RS and RL. Lodging increased the allocation of dry matter to leaves and stems, but decreased the allocation to spikes. RL and SB shortened the length and diameter of spike, and reduced the grain number per spike. The lodging occurring after the tasseling stage also reduced 100grain mass. RS had no significant effects on spike characters and yield components. The lodging had serious effects on the yield of summer maize. The yield loss was highest for SB with the reduction percentages of 74.2% and 68.7% for Xundan 20 and Zhengdan 958, respectively. SB occurring before the tasseling stage would lead to a complete crop failure. RL decreased the average yield by 46.3% and 46.5% for Xundan 20 and Zhengdan 958, respectively. RS decreased the averaged yield by 8.4% and 13.2% for Xundan 20 and Zhengdan 958, respectively. The mean  yields of Xundan 20 and Zhengdan 958 were 4959.9 and 6026.1 kg·hm-2 after the wind lodging, respectively. The later the sowing date, the higher the yield loss rate was observed for Xundan 20, however, there were no significant difference in yield loss among different sowing dates of Zhengdan 958. In general, Zhengdan 958 had stronger lodging resistance than Xundan 20.