欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

饥饿对食蚊鱼和唐鱼幼鱼能量物质消耗及游泳能力的影响

李江涛,林小涛*,周晨辉,曾鹏,许忠能,孙军   

  1. (暨南大学水生生物研究所/广东省高校水体富营养化与赤潮防治重点实验室, 广州 510632)
  • 出版日期:2016-01-18 发布日期:2016-01-18

Effects of starvation on the consumption of energy sources and swimming performance in juvenile Gambusia affinis and Tanichthys albonubes.

LI Jiang-tao, LIN Xiao-tao*, ZHOU Chen-hui, ZENG Peng, XU Zhong-neng, SUN Jun   

  1. (Institute of Hydrobiology, Jinan University/Key Laboratory of Aquatic Eutrophication and Control of Harmful Algal Blooms of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, Guangzhou 510632, China)
  • Online:2016-01-18 Published:2016-01-18

摘要: 为探究食蚊鱼和唐鱼在遭受饥饿胁迫时其能量物质消耗利用特征以及在游泳能力上的响应,在室内(25±1) ℃水温下设0(对照组)、10、20、30和40 d 5种饥饿时间,研究了饥饿对食蚊鱼和唐鱼幼鱼主要能量物质消耗以及对爆发游泳速度(Uburst)和临界游泳速度(Ucrit)的影响,旨在从能量代谢和游泳行为角度探讨食蚊鱼和唐鱼幼鱼应对饥饿胁迫的策略及其种间差异.结果表明: 饥饿前(0 d对照组),食蚊鱼糖原和脂肪含量均显著小于唐鱼,蛋白质含量却与唐鱼无显著差异,而无论何种游泳速度,食蚊鱼均显著小于唐鱼.经历不同饥饿时间后,两种鱼糖原含量均随饥饿时间增加呈显著幂函数曲线下降趋势,并在饥饿10 d时接近于0,而脂肪和蛋白质含量均随饥饿时间呈显著线性下降.与唐鱼相比,食蚊鱼脂肪饥饿时间线性方程斜率显著降低,但蛋白质-饥饿时间方程斜率却显著增加.饥饿40 d后,食蚊鱼和唐鱼能量物质消耗率均显示为糖原>脂肪>蛋白质;但从能量物质的绝对消耗量来看,食蚊鱼表现为蛋白质>脂肪>糖原,而唐鱼则是脂肪>蛋白质>糖原.而无论何种试验鱼,其UburstUcrit均随饥饿时间增加呈显著线性下降,且Uburst饥饿时间线性方程斜率均显著小于Ucrit饥饿时间方程.与唐鱼相比,食蚊鱼Uburst饥饿时间线性方程斜率无显著变化,但Ucrit饥饿时间线性方程斜率却显著降低.结果表明,饥饿胁迫下2种鱼的能量物质消耗利用特征与游泳能力变化密切相关.相比唐鱼,食蚊鱼虽然整体上能量储备较少,游泳能力较低,但在饥饿期间却主要利用储存量更大的蛋白质供能,饥饿后脂肪含量下降幅度小于唐鱼,其Ucrit变化比唐鱼更加稳定,这从一定程度上表明其具有更强的耐饥饿潜力,为适应营养匮乏的溪流生境提供了有利条件.

Abstract: To explore the consumption of energy sources and swimming performance of juvenile Gambusia affinis and Tanichthys albonubes after starvation, contents of glycogen, lipid and protein, burst swimming speeds (Uburst), and critical swimming speeds (Ucrit) at different starvation times (0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 days) were evaluated. The results showed that, at 0 day, contents of glycogen and lipid were significantly lower in G. affinis than those in T. albonubes, whereas no significant difference in content of protein between two experimental fish was found. Swimming speeds in G. affinis were significantly lower than those in T. albonubes for all swimming performances. After different starvation scenarios, content of glycogen both in G. affinis and T. albonubes decreased significantly in power function trend with starvation time and were close to zero after starvation for 10 days, whereas the contents of lipid and protein were linearly significantly decreased. The slope of line regression equation between content of lipid and starvation time in G. affinis was significantly lower than that in T. albonubes, whereas there was a significantly higher slope of line equation between content of protein and starvation time in G. affinis. 40 days later, the consumption rate of glycogen both in G. affinis and T. albonubes were significantly higher than that of lipid, while the consumption rate of protein was the least. Consumption amounts of glycogen in all experimental fish were the least, G. affinis consumed more protein than lipid, and T. albonubes consumed more lipid than protein. Uburst and Ucrit decreased significantly linearly with starvation time for all experimental fish. Slope of linear equation between Uburst and starvation time was not significantly different between G. affinis and T. albonubes. However, the straight slope between Ucrit and starvation time was significantly lower in G. affinis than that in T. albonubes. These findings indicated that there was close relationship between the consumption of energy sources and swimming performance in starvation. Although the store amounts of energy sources and swimming performance were lower in G. affinis than those in T. albonubes, G. affinis mainly used protein during starvation. The result of more stable lipid content and Ucrit in G. affinis in starvation  compared with that in T. albonubes indicated that G. affinis had a fair endurance to starvation, which helped them to adapt to the poor nutrition environment in stream habitat.