乡土风箱果和紫叶风箱果叶片光合特性对土壤干旱的响应

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.201706.039

应用生态学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (6): 1955-1961.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201706.039

乡土风箱果和紫叶风箱果叶片光合特性对土壤干旱的响应

许楠¹, 孟祥馨悦², 赵曦铭², 艾畅², 孙佳琦², 张思宇², 张丛阳², 张会慧^2*

¹黑龙江省科学院自然与生态研究所, 哈尔滨 150040
²东北农业大学资源与环境学院, 哈尔滨 150030

收稿日期:2016-11-02 发布日期:2017-06-18
通讯作者: *E-mail:xtwfwf@126.com
作者简介:许楠,男,1982年生,博士.主要从事植物生理生态学研究.E-mail:xunan0451@126.com
基金资助:
本文由国家自然科学基金项目(31500323)资助

Responses of photosynthetic characteristics in leaves of Physocarpus amurensis and P opulifolius to drought stress

XU Nan¹, MENG Xiang-xin-yue², ZHAO Xi-ming², AI Chang², SUN Jia-qi², ZHANG Si-yu², ZHANG Cong-yang², ZHANG Hui-hui^2*

¹Natural Resources and Ecology Institute, Heilongjiang Sciences Academy, Harbin 150040, China
²College of Resources and Environment, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China

Received:2016-11-02 Published:2017-06-18
Contact: *E-mail:xtwfwf@126.com
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31500323)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究叶片光合气体交换参数和叶绿素荧光参数对土壤干旱的响应,分析濒危的乡土风箱果和引种紫叶风箱果的抗旱能力及其差异.结果表明: 土壤干旱第7天时,紫叶风箱果叶片明显失水萎蔫,而乡土风箱果却有较高的叶片含水率和水分利用效率.土壤干旱降低了2种风箱果叶片的净光合速率、气孔导度和蒸腾速率,紫叶风箱果降低幅度明显大于乡土风箱果.土壤干旱7 d时,紫叶风箱果叶片的胞间CO₂浓度(C_i)高于未干旱处理,而乡土风箱果C_i低于未干旱处理.乡土风箱果叶片的电子传递速率(ETR)和光化学淬灭系数(q_P)明显降低,而PSⅡ反应中心光能捕获效率(F_v′/F_m′)没有发生明显变化;但是紫叶风箱果叶片的F_v′/F_m′、ETR和q_P均明显降低,并且其降低幅度大于乡土风箱果.土壤干旱7 d时,乡土风箱果叶片OJIP曲线上J点的相对可变荧光(V_J)没有发生明显变化,而紫叶风箱果叶片V_J明显增加.紫叶风箱果的叶片碳同化能力和PSⅡ功能对土壤干旱的敏感性明显大于乡土风箱果,土壤干旱降低乡土风箱果光合能力的原因以气孔因素限制为主,而紫叶风箱果以非气孔因素限制为主.

Abstract: This experiment was conducted to study the responses of photosynthetic gas exchange parameters and the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in leaves to soil drought. Furthermore, the drought resistance abilities of the endangered native Physocarpus amurensis and the introduced P. opulifolius as well as their differences were studied. The results showed that the leaves of P. opulifolius wilted significantly, while the leaf water content and water use efficiency of the native P. amurensis were higher on the 7th day after soil drought. Soil drought reduced the net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate in the leaves of the two Physocarpus species, while the observed decrease of P. opulifolius was significantly higher than that of P. amurensis. On the 7th day after soil drought, the intercellular CO₂ concentration (C_i) of P. opulifolius was higher than that without drought treatment, while the C_i of P. amurensis was lower than that without drought treatment. The electron transfer rate (ETR) and photochemical quenching coefficient (q_P) in leaves of P. amurensis were clearly decreased, while differences of the light energy capture efficiency (F_v′/F_m′) in the PSⅡ reaction center were non-significant. However, F_v′/F_m′, ETR, and q_P in the lea-ves of P. opulifolius were all significantly decreased to greater extents compared to those in P. amurensis. On the 7th day after soil drought, a non-significant change was observed on the relative variable fluorescence (V_J) at site J of the OJIP curve of P. amurensis leaves, while V_J in leaves of P. opuli-folius was increased. The carbon assimilation ability of P. opulifolius leaves and the sensibility of PSⅡ function to soil drought were significantly higher than those of P. amurensis. The reduction in the photosynthetic capacity induced by soil drought was mainly due to the limitation of the stomatal factors for P. amurensis, but mainly due to the limitation of the non-stomatal factors for P. opulifolius.

许楠, 孟祥馨悦, 赵曦铭, 艾畅, 孙佳琦, 张思宇, 张丛阳, 张会慧. 乡土风箱果和紫叶风箱果叶片光合特性对土壤干旱的响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(6): 1955-1961.

XU Nan, MENG Xiang-xin-yue, ZHAO Xi-ming, AI Chang, SUN Jia-qi, ZHANG Si-yu, ZHANG Cong-yang, ZHANG Hui-hui. Responses of photosynthetic characteristics in leaves of Physocarpus amurensis and P opulifolius to drought stress[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(6): 1955-1961.

参考文献

[1] Sutherland BG, Tobutt KR, Marchese A, et al. A genetic linkage map of Physocarpus, a member of the Spi-raeoideae (Rosaceae), based on RAPD, AFLP, RGA, SSR and gene specific markers. Plant Breeding, 2008, 127: 527-532
[2] Yin D-S (殷东生), Wei X-H (魏晓慧), Shen H-L (沈海龙). Floral syndrome and breeding system of Physocarpus amurensis. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (北京林业大学学报), 2016, 38(1): 67-73 (in Chinese)
[3] Yin D-S (殷东生), Shen H-L (沈海龙), Lan S-B (兰士波). Pollen viability, stigma receptivity and pollinators of Physocarpus amurensis. Journal of Northeast Forestry University (东北林业大学学报), 2010, 38(4): 80-81 (in Chinese)
[4] Qin R-M (秦瑞明), Wang D (王迪), Chi F-C (迟福昌). Rare and Endangered Plants in Heilongjiang Province. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University Press, 1993: 97-99 (in Chinese)
[5] Kim YK, Yoon SK, Ryu SY. Cytotoxic triterpenes from stem bark of Physocarpus intermedius. Planta Medica, 2000, 66: 485-486
[6] Munsamy A, Naidoo Y. Laticifers in the leaves and stems of Gomphocarpus physocarpus: Distribution, structure and chemical composition. Planta Medica, 2015, 81: 1-8
[7] Liu X-D (刘晓东), Yu J (于晶). Extraction of anthocyanin from Physocarpus opulifolius ‘Diabolo’ and its stability. Journal of Northeast Forestry University (东北林业大学学报), 2011, 39(2): 38-39 (in Chinese)
[8] Chalker-Scott L. Environmental significance of anthocyanins in plant stress responses. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 1999, 70: 1-9
[9] Zlesak DC. Physocarpus opulifolius (L.) Maxim ‘Donna May’: A new compact, purple-leafed landscape shrub. Hortscience, 2012, 47: 1372-1374
[10] Yu Y-Y (郁永英), Zhang H-Y (张华艳), Pan J (潘杰), et al. Cross-breeding of Physocarpus plant. Journal of Northeast Forestry University (东北林业大学学报), 2010, 38(7): 16-18 (in Chinese)
[11] Liu X-D (刘晓东), Zhai X-Y (翟晓宇), Shi B (施冰). Cold resistances of P. opulusclius ‘Summer Wine’. Journal of Northeast Forestry University (东北林业大学学报), 2011, 39(4): 38-39 (in Chinese)
[12] Liu Y, Li S, Chen F, et al. Soil water dynamics and water use efficiency in spring maize (Zea mays L.) fields subjected to different water management practices on the Loess Plateau, China. Agricultural Water Mana-gement, 2010, 97: 769-775
[13] Chaitanya KV, Jutur PP, Sundar D, et al. Water stress effects on photosynthesis in different mulberry cultivars. Plant Growth Regulation, 2003, 40: 75-80
[14] Parry MAJ, Andralojc PJ, Khan S, et al. Rubisco acti-vity: Effects of drought stress. Annals of Botany, 2002, 89: 833-839
[15] Manivannan P, Jaleel CA, Sankar B, et al. Growth, bio-chemical modifications and praline metabolism in Helianthus annuus L. as induced by drought stress. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 2007, 59: 141-149
[16] Nielsen DC, Vigil MF, Benjamin JG. The variable response of dry land corn yield to soil water content at planting. Agricultural Water Management, 2009, 96: 330-336
[17] Zhang H-H (张会慧), Zhang X-L (张秀丽), Xu N (许楠), et al. Effects of exogenous CaCl₂ on the functions of flue-cured tobacco seedlings leaf photosystem Ⅱ under drought stress. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2011, 22(5): 1195-1200 (in Chinese)
[18] Gao J (高杰), Zhang R-H (张仁和), Wang W-B (王文斌), et al. Effects of drought stress on perfor-mance of photosystem Ⅱ in maize seedling stage. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2015, 26(5): 1391-1396 (in Chinese)
[19] Schansker G, To’th SZ, Strasser RJ. Methylviologen and dibromothymoquinone treatments of pea leaves reveal the role of photosystem Ⅰ in the Chl a fluorescence rise OJIP. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 2005, 1706: 250-261
[20] Chen YH, Hsu BD. Effect of dehydration on the electron transport of Chlorella: An in vivo fluorescence study. Photosynthesis Research, 1995, 46: 295-299
[21] Efeoglu B, Ekmekci Y, Cicek N. Physiological responses of three maize cultivars to drought stress and recovery. South African Journal Botany, 2009, 75: 34-42
[22] Massacci A, Nabiv SM, Pietrosanti L, et al. Response of photosynthesis apparatus of cotton to the onset of drought stress under field conditions by gas change ana-lysis and chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. Plant Physio-logy and Biochemistry, 2008, 46: 189-195
[23] Hendrickson L, Förster B, Pogson BJ, et al. A simple chlorophyll fluorescence parameter that correlates with the rate coefficient of photoinactivation of photosystem Ⅱ. Photosynthesis Research, 2005, 11: 741-747
[24] Zhou YH, Lam HM, Zhang JH. Inhibition of photosynthesis and energy dissipation induced by water and high light stresses in rice. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2007, 5: 1207-1217
[25] Strasserf RJ, Srivastava A. Polyphasic chlorophyll a fluo-rescence transient in plants and cyanobacteria. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 1995, 61: 32-42
[26] Dou X-Y (窦新永), Wu G-J (吴国江), Huang H-Y (黄红英), et al. Responses of Jatropha curcas L. seedlings to drought stress. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2008, 19(7): 1425-1430 (in Chinese)
[27] Farquhar GD, Sharkey TD. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 1982, 33: 317-345
[28] Zhang H-H (张会慧), Tian Q (田褀), Liu G-J (刘关君), et al. Responses of antioxidant enzyme and PSⅡ electron transport in leaf of transgenic tobacco carrying 2-Cys Prx to salt and light stresses. Acta Agronomica Sinica (作物学报), 2013, 39(11): 2023-2029 (in Chinese)
[29] Lu CM, Qiu NW, Wang BS, et al. Salinity treatment shows no effects on photosystem Ⅱ photochemistry, but increases the resistance of photosystem Ⅱ to heat stress in halophyte Suaeda salsa. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2003, 54: 851-860
[30] Li X (李鑫), Zhang H-H (张会慧), Zhang X-L (张秀丽), et al. Photosynthetic gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in response to illumination intensity in leavesof Lespedeza davurica under diffe-rent light environments. Pratacultural Science (草业科学), 2016, 33(4): 706-712 (in Chinese)
[31] Konstantina Z, Yiannis M, Yiola P. Transient winter leaf reddening in Cistus creticus characterizes weak (stress-sensitive) individuals, yet anthocyanins cannot alleviate the adverse effects on photosynthesis. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2009, 60: 3031-3042
[32] Wang L-Z (王良再), Hu Y-B (胡彦波), Zhang H-H (张会慧), et al. Photoprotective mechanisms of leaf anthocyanins: Research progress. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2012, 23(3): 835-841 (in Chinese)
[33] Skotnica J, Matoušková M, Nauš J, et al. Thermoluminescence and fluorescence study of changes in photosystem Ⅱ photochemistry in desiccating barley leaves. Photosynthesis Research, 2000, 65: 29-40
[34] Li PM, Cheng LL, Gao HY, et al. Heterogeneous behavior of PSⅡ in soybean (Glycine max) leaves with identical PSⅡ photochemistry efficiency under different high temperature treatments. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2009, 166: 1607-1615
[35] Zhang H-H (张会慧), Zhang X-L (张秀丽), Li X (李鑫), et al. Role of D1 protein turnover and xanthophylls cycle in protecting of photosystem Ⅱ functions in leaves of Morus alba under NaCl stress. Scientia Silvae Sinice (林业科学), 2013, 49(1): 99-106 (in Chinese)
[36] Cheng DD, Zhang ZS, Sun XB, et al. Photoinhibition and photoinhibition-like damage to the photosynthetic apparatus in tobacco leaves induced by Pseudomonas syringae pv. Tabaci under light and dark conditions. BMC Plant Biology, 2016, 16: 1-11

乡土风箱果和紫叶风箱果叶片光合特性对土壤干旱的响应

Responses of photosynthetic characteristics in leaves of Physocarpus amurensis and P opulifolius to drought stress

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价