[1] Olff H. Effects of light and nutrient availability on dry matter and N allocation in six successional grassland species. Oecologia, 1992, 89: 412-421 [2] McCarthy MC, Enquist BJ. Consistency between an allometric approach and optimal partitioning theory in global patterns of plant biomass allocation. Functional Ecology, 2007, 21: 713-720 [3] Johnson NC, Rowland DL, Corkidi L, et al. Plant winners and losers during grassland N-eutrophication differ in biomass allocation and mycorrhizas. Ecology, 2008, 89: 2868-2878 [4] Gleeson SK, Tilman D. Allocation and the transient dynamics of succession on poor soils. Ecology, 1990, 71: 1144-1155 [5] Avolio ML, Smith MD. Mechanisms of selection: Phenotypic differences among genotypes explain patterns of selection in a dominant species. Ecology, 2013, 94: 953-965 [6] Fujita Y, Venterink HO, van Bodegom PM, et al. Low investment in sexual reproduction threatens plants adapted to phosphorus limitation. Nature, 2014, 505: 82-86 [7] West GB, Brown JH, Enquist BJ. A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology. Science, 1997, 276: 122-126 [8] Enquist BJ, Niklas KJ. Global allocation rules for patterns of biomass partitioning in seed plants. Science, 2002, 295: 1517-1520 [9] West GB, Brown JH, Enquist BJ. A general model for the structure and allometry of plant vascular systems. Nature, 1999, 400: 664-667 [10] Enquist BJ, West GB, Charnov EL, et al. Allometric scaling of production and life-history variation in vascular plants. Nature, 1999, 401: 907-911 [11] Poorter H, Jagodzinski AM, Ruiz-Peinado R, et al. How does biomass distribution change with size and differ among species? An analysis for 1200 plant species from five continents. New Phytologist, 2015, 208: 736-749 [12] Xian J-R (鲜骏仁), Hu T-X (胡庭兴), Zhang Y-B (张远彬), et al. Effects of forest canopy gap on Abies faxoniana seedling’s biomass and its allocation in subalpine coniferous forest of West Sichuan. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2007, 18(4): 721-727 (in Chinese) [13] Wright SJ, Yavitt JB, Wurzburger N, et al. Potassium, phosphorus, or nitrogen limit root allocation, tree growth, or litter production in a lowland tropical forest. Ecology, 2011, 92: 1616-1625 [14] Yang L-X (杨连新), Wang Y-L (王余龙), Li S-F (李世峰), et al. Effects of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) on dry matter production and allocation in wheat. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2007, 18(2): 339-346 (in Chinese) [15] Xiao Y (肖 遥), Zhang Y-M (张元明). Biomass allocation and leaf stoichiometric characteristics in four desert herbaceous plants during different growth periods in the Gurbantünggüt Desert, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology (植物生态学报), 2014, 38(9): 929-940 (in Chinese) [16] Müller I, Schmid B, Weiner J. The effect of nutrient availability on biomass allocation patterns in 27 species of herbaceous plants. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 2000, 3: 115-127 [17] Zhang J-P (张建平), Li T (李 涛), Zhao Z-W (赵之伟). Diversity of arbuscular mycorrizal fungi in the hot-dry valley of Jinsha River. Mycosystema (菌物系统), 2003, 22(4): 604-612 (in Chinese) [18] Yan B-G (闫帮国), Liu G-C (刘刚才), Fan B (樊博), et al. Relationships between plant stoichiometry and biomass in an arid-hot valley, Southwest China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology (植物生态学报), 2015, 39(8): 807-815 (in Chinese) [19] Chen G, Yang Y, Robinson D. Allocation of gross primary production in forest ecosystems: Allometric constraints and environmental responses. New Phytologist, 2013, 200: 1176-1186 [20] Warton DI, Duursma RA, Falster DS, et al. Smatr 3: An R package for estimation and inference about allometric lines. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2012, 3: 257-259 [21] Kerkhoff AJ, Enquist BJ. Ecosystem allometry: The scaling of nutrient stocks and primary productivity across plant communities. Ecology Letters, 2006, 9: 419-427 [22] Kozłowski J, Konarzewski M. Is West, Brown and Enquist’s model of allometric scaling mathematically correct and biologically relevant? Functional Ecology, 2004, 18: 283-289 [23] Borer ET, Seabloom EW, Gruner DS, et al. Herbivores and nutrients control grassland plant diversity via light limitation. Nature, 2014, 508: 517-520 [24] Poorter H, Niklas KJ, Reich PB, et al. Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: Meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. New Phytologist, 2012, 193: 30-50 [25] Patty L, Halloy SRP, Hiltbrunner E, et al. Biomass allocation in herbaceous plants under grazing impact in the high semi-arid Andes. Flora: Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants, 2010, 205: 695-703 [26] Piñeiro G, Paruelo JM, Jobbágy EG, et al. Grazing effects on belowground C and N stocks along a network of cattle exclosures in temperate and subtropical grasslands of South America. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2009, 23: 1291-1298 [27] Arredondo JT, Johnson DA. Root architecture and biomass allocation of three range grasses in response to nonuniform supply of nutrients and shoot defoliation. New Phytologist, 1999, 143: 373-385 [28] Niklas KJ. Plant allometry, leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry, and interspecific trends in annual growth rates. Annals of Botany, 2006, 97: 155-163 |