城市绿地土壤健康质量问题与对策

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202201.009

应用生态学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 268-276.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202201.009

城市绿地土壤健康质量问题与对策

韩继刚^1,2, 李刚³, 张维维^1,2, 刘文^1,2, 刘舒³, 马想^1,2, 张浪^1,2*, 朱永官³

¹上海市园林科学规划研究院, 城市困难立地生态园林国家林业和草原局重点实验室, 国家林业和草原局城市困难立地绿化造林国家创新联盟, 上海 200232;
²上海城市困难立地绿化工程技术研究中心, 上海 200232;
³中国科学院城市环境研究所城市环境与健康重点实验室, 福建厦门 361021

收稿日期:2021-05-13 接受日期:2021-11-16 出版日期:2022-01-15 发布日期:2022-07-15
通讯作者: * E-mail: 1132467518@qq.com
作者简介:韩继刚, 男, 1970年生, 博士, 教授。主要从事城市绿地土壤质量监测和土壤功能微生物研究。E-mail: jghan9@gmail.com
基金资助:
国家住房和城乡建设部科技研发项目(K62018038)、上海市科学技术委员会科研计划项目(19dz1203300,16dz2251400)和上海市绿化和市容管理局科技攻关项目(G200201)

Problems and countermeasures of soil health quality in urban green space

HAN Ji-gang^1,2, LI Gang³, ZHANG Wei-wei^1,2, LIU Wen^1,2, LIU Shu³, MA Xiang^1,2, ZHANG Lang^1,2*, ZHU Yong-guan³

¹Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration on Ecological Landscaping of Challenging Urban Sites, National Forestry and Grassland Administration Innovation Alliance on Afforestation and Landscaping of Challenging Urban Sites, Shanghai Academy of Landscape Architecture Science and Planning, Shanghai 200232, China;
²Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Landscaping on Challenging Urban Sites, Shanghai 200232, China;
³CAS Key Lab of Urban Environment and Health, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, Fujian, China

Received:2021-05-13 Accepted:2021-11-16 Online:2022-01-15 Published:2022-07-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 城市绿地土壤质量是保障绿化植物健康生长的基础,也是保障绿地为城市及其居民提供健康生态系统服务和城市可持续发展的重要基础。目前在提升城市绿地土壤质量方面,主要关注了肥力质量和环境质量方面的问题,对健康质量方面的问题还较少关注。本文综述了土壤健康质量的概念、内涵及其评价指标,总结了城市绿地土壤健康质量所面临的主要问题和挑战,提出了提升城市绿地土壤健康质量的途径和策略,展望了今后有关城市绿地土壤健康质量的研究方向。旨在引起人们对城市绿地土壤质量,特别是城市绿地土壤健康质量的重视,以充分认识到全面提升城市绿地土壤质量、为城市可持续发展和生态城市建设提供有力支撑的重要意义。

关键词: 城市绿地, 土壤健康质量, 问题, 对策

Abstract: Soil quality of urban green space (UGS) is the basis for ensuring healthy growth of plants and maintaining the healthy ecosystem services for the residents and the sustainable development of city. At present, in order to improve the soil quality of UGS, more attention has been paid to fertility quality and environmental quality, but less to the health quality. We analyzed the concept, connotation, and assessment indicator of soil health quality, summarized the main problems and challenges of soil health quality of UGS. Finally, we put forward the ways and strategies to improve soil health quality of UGS, and prospected future research direction. Our aim was to attract the attention to the soil quality of UGS, especially soil health quality, and the importance of comprehensively improving soil quality of UGS, eventually providing strong technical support for urban sustainable development and eco-city construction.

Key words: urban green space (UGS), soil health quality, problem, measure

韩继刚, 李刚, 张维维, 刘文, 刘舒, 马想, 张浪, 朱永官. 城市绿地土壤健康质量问题与对策[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(1): 268-276.

HAN Ji-gang, LI Gang, ZHANG Wei-wei, LIU Wen, LIU Shu, MA Xiang, ZHANG Lang, ZHU Yong-guan. Problems and countermeasures of soil health quality in urban green space[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(1): 268-276.

参考文献 80

[1]	中华人民共和国统计局. 中国统计年鉴. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2019
[2]	Hao Y, Zheng S, Zhao M, et al. Reexamining the relationships among urbanization, industrial structure, and environmental pollution in China: New evidence using the dynamic threshold panel model. Energy Reports, 2020, 6: 28-39
[3]	Fan P, Xu L, Yue W, et al. Accessibility of public urban green space in an urban periphery: The case of Shanghai. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2017, 165: 177-192
[4]	骆玉珍, 张维维, 李雅颖, 等. 上海市公园绿地土壤肥力特征分析与综合评价. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019(6): 13
[5]	岳军妹, 刘群录, 孙文, 等. 上海市外环高速公路4个绿地土壤重金属含量及污染状况. 上海交通大学学报: 农业科学版, 2018, 36(5): 7-13
[6]	Carreiro MM, Pouyat RV, Tripler CE, et al. Carbon and nitrogen cycling in soils of remnant forests along urban-rural gradients: Case studies in the New York metropolitan area and Louisville, Kentucky// McDonnell MJ, ed. Ecology of Cities and Towns: A Comparative Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009: 308-328
[7]	Francini G, Hui N, Jumpponen A, et al. Soil biota in boreal urban greenspace: Responses to plant type and age. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2018, 118: 145-155
[8]	Liu Z, He C, Wu J. The relationship between habitat loss and fragmentation during urbanization: An empirical evaluation from 16 world cities. PLoS One, 2016, 11(4): e0154613, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154613
[9]	Tyler HL, Triplett EW. Plants as a habitat for beneficial and/or human pathogenic bacteria. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 2008, 46: 53-73
[10]	Wang FH, Qiao M, Su JQ, et al. High throughput profiling of antibiotic resistance genes in urban park soils with reclaimed water irrigation. Environmental Science and Technology, 2014, 48: 9079-9085
[11]	Adimalla N. Heavy metals pollution assessment and its associated human health risk evaluation of urban soils from indian cities: A review. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2020, 42: 173-190
[12]	Brevik E, Sauer T. The past, present, and future of soils and human health studies. Soil, 2015, 1: 35-46
[13]	Li G, Sun GX, Ren Y, et al. Urban soil and human health: A review. European Journal of Soil Science, 2018, 69: 196-215
[14]	Zhu YG, Ioannidis JP, Li H, et al. Understanding and harnessing the health effects of rapid urbanization in China. Environmental Science and Technology, 2011, 45: 5099-5104
[15]	Lehmann J, Bossio DA, Kögel-Knabner I, et al. The concept and future prospects of soil health. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment, 2020, 1: 544-553
[16]	张俊伶, 张江周, 申建波, 等. 土壤健康与农业绿色发展: 机遇与对策. 土壤学报, 2020, 57(4): 783-796
[17]	刘占锋, 傅伯杰, 刘国华, 等. 土壤质量与土壤质量指标及其评价. 生态学报, 2006, 26(3): 901-913
[18]	赵其国, 孙波, 张桃林. 土壤质量与持续环境Ⅰ. 土壤质量的定义及评价方法. 土壤, 1997(3): 113-120
[19]	Anderson TH. Microbial eco-physiological indicators to asses soil quality. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2003, 98: 285-293
[20]	徐建明, 张甘霖, 谢正苗, 等. 土壤质量指标与评价. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010
[21]	Doran JW, Parkin TB. Defining and assessing soil quality// Doran W, Coleman DC, Bezdicek DF, eds. Defining Soil Quality for A Sustainable Environment. Madison, WI, USA: Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1994
[22]	The Nature Conservancy. reThink Soil, A Roadmap to U.S. Soil Health [EB/OL]. (2016) [2021-11-12]. https://www.nature.org/content/dam/tnc/nature/en/documents/rethink-soil-executive-summary.pdf
[23]	Norris CE, Bean GM, Cappellazzi SB, et al. Introducing the North American project to evaluate soil health mea-surements. Agronomy Journal, 2020, 112: 3195-3215
[24]	Publications Office of the EU. Caring for Soil Is Caring for Life[EB/OL]. (2020-09-22) [2021-11-12]. https://op.europa.eu/en/web/eu-law-and-publications/publication-detail/-/publication/32d5d312-b689-11ea-bb7a-01aa75ed71a1
[25]	Brussaard L, Kuyper T, Didden W, et al. Biological soil quality from biomass to biodiversity: Importance and resilience to management stress and disturbance// Sojka RE, Sanchez P, eds. Managing Soil Quality: Challenges in Modern Agriculture. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing, 2004: 139-161
[26]	Wagg C, Schlaeppi K, Banerjee S, et al. Fungal-bacterial diversity and microbiome complexity predict ecosystem functioning. Nature Communications, 2019, 10: 4841
[27]	Bünemann EK, Bongiorno G, Bai Z, et al. Soil quality: A critical review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2018, 120: 105-125
[28]	Frouz J, Nováková A. Development of soil microbial properties in topsoil layer during spontaneous succession in heaps after brown coal mining in relation to humus microstructure development. Geoderma, 2005, 129: 54-64
[29]	Lu Q, Liu T, Wang N, et al. A review of soil nematodes as biological indicators for the assessment of soil health. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2020, 7: 275-281
[30]	Povolo VR, Ackermann M. Disseminating antibiotic resistance during treatment. Science, 2019, 364: 737-738
[31]	Yan ZZ, Chen QL, Zhang YJ, et al. Antibiotic resis-tance in urban green spaces mirrors the pattern of industrial distribution. Environment International, 2019, 132: 105106, doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105106
[32]	Shi Y, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Li YT, et al. Abundance of kinless hubs within soil microbial networks are associa-ted with high functional potential in agricultural ecosystems. Environment International, 2020, 142: 105869, doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105869
[33]	Banerjee S, Schlaeppi K, van der Heijden MG. Keystone taxa as drivers of microbiome structure and func-tioning. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2018, 16: 567-576
[34]	Jiao S, Chen W, Wei G. Biogeography and ecological diversity patterns of rare and abundant bacteria in oil-contaminated soils. Molecular Ecology, 2017, 26: 5305-5317
[35]	Liang Y, Xiao X, Nuccio EE, et al. Differentiation strategies of soil rare and abundant microbial taxa in response to changing climatic regimes. Environmental Microbiology, 2020, 22: 1327-1340
[36]	Xue Y, Chen H, Yang JR, et al. Distinct patterns and processes of abundant and rare eukaryotic plankton communities following a reservoir cyanobacterial bloom. The ISME Journal, 2018, 12: 2263-2277
[37]	Blouin M, Hodson ME, Delgado EA, et al. A review of earthworm impact on soil function and ecosystem ser-vices. European Journal of Soil Science, 2013, 64: 161-182
[38]	Bongiorno G. Novel soil quality indicators for the evaluation of agricultural management practices: A biological perspective. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2020, 7: 257-274
[39]	Trivedi P, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Trivedi C, et al. Keystone microbial taxa regulate the invasion of a fungal pathogen in agro-ecosystems. Soil Biology and Bioche-mistry, 2017, 111: 10-14
[40]	Bowers RM, McLetchie S, Knight R, et al. Spatial varia-bility in airborne bacterial communities across land-use types and their relationship to the bacterial communities of potential source environments. The ISME Journal, 2011, 5: 601-612
[41]	Hanski I, von Hertzen L, Fyhrquist N, et al. Environmental biodiversity, human microbiota, and allergy are interrelated. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012, 109: 8334-8339
[42]	von Hertzen L, Haahtela T. Disconnection of man and the soil: Reason for the asthma and atopy epidemic? Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2006, 117: 334-344
[43]	Trivedi P, Trivedi C, Grinyer J, et al. Harnessing host-vector microbiome for sustainable plant disease management of phloem-limited bacteria. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016, 7: 1423, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01423
[44]	Trivedi P, Leach JE, Tringe SG, et al. Plant-micro-biome interactions: From community assembly to plant health. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2020, 18: 607-621
[45]	Tao HH, Slade EM, Willis KJ, et al. Effects of soil management practices on soil fauna feeding activity in an Indonesian oil palm plantation. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2016, 218: 133-140
[46]	Liu KL, Peng MH, Hung YC, et al. Effects of park size, peri-urban forest spillover, and environmental filtering on diversity, structure, and morphology of ant assemblages in urban park. Urban Ecosystems, 2019, 22: 643-656
[47]	Tóth Z, Hornung E. Taxonomic and functional response of millipedes (diplopoda) to urban soil disturbance in a metropolitan area. Insects, 2020, 11: 25, doi: 10.3390/insects11010025
[48]	Xie T, Wang M, Chen W, et al. Impacts of urbanization and landscape patterns on the earthworm communities in residential areas in Beijing. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 626: 1261-1269
[49]	Gosling L, Sparks TH, Araya Y, et al. Differences between urban and rural hedges in England revealed by a citizen science project. BMC Ecology, 2016, 16: 15, doi: 10.1186/s12898-016-0064-1
[50]	Dozsa-Farkas K. Effect of human treading on enchytraeid fauna of hornbeam-oak forests in hungary. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 1987, 3: 91-93
[51]	Skaldina O, Peräniemi S, Sorvari J. Ants and their nests as indicators for industrial heavy metal contamination. Environmental Pollution, 2018, 240: 574-581
[52]	Pižl V, Josens G. Earthworm communities along a gra-dient of urbanization. Environmental Pollution, 1995, 90: 7-14
[53]	Rzeszowski K, Zadrony P, Nicia P. The effect of soil nutrient gradients on collembola communities inhabiting typical urban green spaces. Pedobiologia, 2017, 64: 15-24
[54]	da Silva Souza T, Christofoletti CA, Bozzatto V, et al. The use of diplopods in soil ecotoxicology: A review. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2014, 103: 68-73
[55]	Wall DH, Nielsen UN, Six J. Soil biodiversity and human health. Nature, 2015, 528: 69-76
[56]	Zhang JL, van der Heijden MG, Zhang FS, et al. Soil biodiversity and crop diversification are vital components of healthy soils and agricultural sustainability. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2020, 7: 236-242
[57]	Bultman MW, Fisher FS, Pappagianis D. The ecology of soil-borne human pathogens// Selinus O, ed. Essentials of Medical Geology. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, 2013: 477-504
[58]	Pepper IL. The soil health-human health nexus. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2013, 43: 2617-2652
[59]	黄新琦, 蔡祖聪. 土壤微生物与作物土传病害控制. 中国科学院院刊, 2017, 32(6): 593-600
[60]	方天露, 夏佳元, 易图永. 株洲市桥体绿化植物迎春花枯死原因的研究. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(4): 148-152
[61]	韩长志, 李瑞强. 球花石楠黑斑病病害调查及病原鉴定初报. 中国森林病虫, 2019, 33(5): 8-9
[62]	王伟, 王新荣, 曾炳山, 等. 南洋楹溃疡病病原菌生物学特性研究. 中国森林病虫, 2019, 36(6): 14-17
[63]	Brevik EC, Pereg L, Steffan JJ, et al. Soil ecosystem services and human health. Current Opinion in Environmental Science and Health, 2018, 5: 87-92
[64]	Delgado-Baquerizo M, Guerra CA, Cano-Díaz C, et al. The proportion of soil-borne pathogens increases with warming at the global scale. Nature Climate Change, 2020, 10: 550-554
[65]	Zhu YG, Gillings M, Penuelas J. Integrating biomedi-cal, ecological, and sustainability sciences to manage emerging infectious diseases. One Earth, 2020, 3: 23-26
[66]	Zhu YG, Gillings M, Simonet P, et al. Microbial mass movements. Science, 2017, 357: 1099-1100
[67]	Fountain-Jones NM, Craft ME, Funk WC, et al. Urban landscapes can change virus gene flow and evolution in a fragmentation-sensitive carnivore. Molecular Ecology, 2017, 26: 6487-6498
[68]	Bradley CA, Altizer S. Urbanization and the ecology of wildlife diseases. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 2007, 22: 95-102
[69]	United Nations Environment Programme. Frontiers 2017: Emerging issues of environmental concern[EB/OL]. (2017) [2021-11-12]. https://www.un.org/development/desa/youth-flash/publications/2018/06/7975/
[70]	Ben Y, Fu C, Hu M, et al. Human health risk assessment of antibiotic resistance associated with antibiotic residues in the environment: A review. Environmental Research, 2019, 169: 483-493
[71]	Maurya AP, Rajkumari J, Bhattacharjee A, et al. Development, spread and persistence of antibiotic resis-tance genes (args) in the soil microbiomes through co-selection. Reviews on Environmental Health, 2020, 35: 371-378
[72]	上海市城乡建设和交通委员会. 园林绿化栽植土质量标准(DG/TJ 08-231—2013). 上海: 同济大学出版社, 2013
[73]	上海市质量技术监督局. 园林绿化工程种植土壤质量验收规范(DB31/T 769—2013). 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2014
[74]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 绿化种植土壤 (CJ/T 340—2016). 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016
[75]	中华人民共和国生态环境部, 国家市场监管总局. 土壤环境质量建设用地土壤污染风险管控标准(试行)(GB 36600—2018). 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2018
[76]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 住房城乡建设部关于印发海绵城市建设技术指南——低影响开发雨水系统构建(试行)的通知[EB/OL]. (2014-10-23) [2021-11-12]. http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/wjfb/201411/t20141102_219465.html
[77]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 住房和城乡建设部关于发布国家标准《海绵城市建设评价标准》的公告[EB/OL]. (2018-12-26) [2021-11-12]. http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/wjfb/201904/t20190409_240118.html
[78]	Song Y, Kirkwood N, Maksimovič Č, et al. Nature based solutions for contaminated land remediation and brownfield redevelopment in cities: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 663: 568-579
[79]	睢晋玲, 刘淼, 李春林, 等. 海绵城市规划及景观生态学启示——以盘锦市辽东湾新区为例. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(3): 975-982
[80]	初亚奇, 曾坚, 石羽, 等. 基于暴雨径流管理模型的海绵城市景观格局优化模拟. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(12): 4089-4096

城市绿地土壤健康质量问题与对策

Problems and countermeasures of soil health quality in urban green space

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 80

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	邱瑶, 罗涛, 王琼, 蒋思雨. 夏热冬暖地区绿量构成对城市热环境的影响——以福州居住区为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1932-1940.
[2]	唐雨倩, 吴晓奕, 宗桦. 成都青羊区背街小巷行道树孢粉致敏风险分析 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(6): 1615-1621.
[3]	李海防, 俞洁蕾, 邵西宁, 周春玲. 半湿润地区城市绿地灌木的截留集水功能及其影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(5): 1363-1369.
[4]	李肖肖, 唐丽玉, 彭巍, 陈建新, 麻霞. 基于背包式激光雷达测量系统的城市绿地树木三维绿量估算方法 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(10): 2777-2784.
[5]	林佳育, 李榜江, 程才, 张远东, 高敏, 龙明忠. 石质建筑的生物风化防治研究现状 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(8): 3023-3030.
[6]	董锦熠, 胡军和, 金晨钟, 刘勇波. 我国古树资源的生存现状评估及威胁因素分析 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(10): 3707-3714.
[7]	陈樟昊, 黄甘霖. 城市绿地供需的差异与联系研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(11): 3925-3934.
[8]	邵俭, 马宝珊, 段友健, 谢从新, 林少卿, 周贤君, 霍斌. 雅鲁藏布江拉萨裸裂尻鱼种群资源状况及其渔业管理对策 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(7): 2437-2446.
[9]	鲁敏, 罗晓楠, 王永华, 高鑫, 刘国恒. 济南城市森林景观生态格局 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(12): 4117-4126.
[10]	罗丹丹, 王传宽, 金鹰. 植物应对干旱胁迫的气孔调节 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(12): 4333-4343.
[11]	孙守家, 雷帅, 仇兰芬, 李春友, 舒健骅. 北京城市绿地与周边道路空气CO₂浓度和δ¹³C值的差异及影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(11): 3844-3854.
[12]	李琪, 陈文波, 郑蕉, 谢涛, 卢陶捷. 南昌市中心城区绿地景观对PM_2.5的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(11): 3855-3862.
[13]	曹雅琴, 陈樟昊, 黄甘霖, 陈力原, 姜亚琼, 张征恺, 屠星月, 华野毓. 城市绿地格局与居民社会经济特征关系研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(10): 3303-3315.
[14]	刘凤凤, 闫伟姣, 孔繁花, 尹海伟, 班玉龙, 徐文彬. 基于气温实地调查的城市绿地降温效应研究现状与未来展望 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(4): 1387-1396.
[15]	郗凤明1,2*,梁文涓1,2,牛明芬2,王娇月1. 辽宁中部城镇密集区土地利用变化的碳排放及低碳调控对策 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(2): 577-584.