[1] 生态环境部. 土壤环境质量: 建设用地土壤污染风险管控标准(试行) (GB36600—2018). 北京: 中国环境出版集团, 2018 [2] Ali NA, Ater M, Sunahara GI, et al. Phytotoxicity and bioaccumulation of copper and chromium using barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in spiked artificial and natural forest soils. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2004, 57: 363-374 [3] 李波. 外源重金属铜,镍的植物毒害及预测模型研究. 博士论文. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2010 [4] Critto A, Torresan, S, Semenzin, E, et al. Development of a site-specific ecological risk assessment for contaminated sites: Part I. A multi-criteria based system for the selection of ecotoxicological tests and ecological observations. Science of the Total Environment, 2007, 379: 16-33 [5] Li XZ, Wang ME, Chen WP, et al. Ecological risk assessment of polymetallic sites using weight of evidence approach. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2018, 154: 255-262 [6] 吴斌, 宋金明, 李学刚, 等. 证据权重法及其在近海沉积物环境质量评价中的应用研究进展. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(1): 286-294 [7] Piva F, Ciaprini F, Onorati F, et al. Assessing sediment hazard through a weight of evidence approach with bioindicator organisms: A practical model to elaborate data from sediment chemistry, bioavailability, biomarkers and ecotoxicological bioassays. Chemosphere, 2010, 83: 475-485 [8] Thompson C, Wadhia K, Loibner AP, et al. Environmental Toxicity Testing. London, UK: Blackwell, 2005: 269-287 [9] Isigonis P, Ciffroy P, Zabeo A, et al. A multi-criteria ecision analysis based methodology for quantitatively scoring the reliability and relevance of ecotoxicological data. Science of the Total Environment, 2015, 538: 102-116 [10] Semenzin E, Critto A, Carlon C, et al. Development of a site-specific ecological risk assessment for contaminated sites: Part II. A multi-criteria based system for the selection of bioavailability assessment tools. Science of the Total Environment, 2007, 379: 34-45 [11] Sorvari J, Schultz E, Haimi J. Assessment of ecological risks at former landfill site using triad procedure and multicriteria analysis. Risk Analysis, 2013, 33: 203-219 [12] Jensen J, Mesman M. Ecological risk assessment of contaminated land. Decision support for site specific investigations. RIVM Report Number: 711701047 [13] 王美娥, 丁寿康, 郭观林, 等. 污染场地土壤生态风险评估研究进展. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(11): 3946-3958. [14] U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). Ecological Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Process for Designing and Conducting Ecological Risk Assessments: Interim Final (EPA 540-R-97-006). EPA Environmental Response Team, 1997 [15] 水利部. 生态风险评价导则 (SL/Z 467—2009). 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2010 [16] 宋文恩, 陈世宝. 基于水稻根伸长的不同土壤中镉(Cd)毒性阈值(ECx)及预测模型. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(17): 3434-3443 [17] 李宁. 基于不同终点测定土壤铅的生态风险阈值及其预测模型. 硕士论文. 北京: 中国农业科学院,2016 [18] 陈世宝, 林蕾, 魏威, 等. 基于不同测试终点的土壤锌毒性阈值及预测模型. 中国环境科学, 2013, 33(5): 922-930 [19] 付平南, 贡晓飞, 罗丽韵, 等. 不同价态铬和土壤理化性质对大麦根系毒性阈值的影响. 环境科学, 2020, 41(5): 2398-2405 [20] 岳士忠, 张慧琦, 黄财德, 等. 不同基质及硒添加量对蚯蚓生长、繁殖和富硒能力的影响. 应用与环境生物学报, 2019, 25(4): 885-891 [21] OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). Test No. 208: Terrestrial Plant Test: Seedling Emergence and Seedling Growth Test. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals. Paris: OECD, 2006 [22] Wu J, Joergensen RG, Pommerening B, et al. Measurement of soil microbial biomass C by fumigation extraction: An automated procedure. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 1990, 22:1167-1169 [23] Xu B, Brandt-Pearce M. Comparison of FWM-and XPM-induced crosstalk using the Volterra series transfer function method. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2003, 21: 40-53 [24] 林蕾, 刘继芳, 陈世宝, 等. 基质诱导硝化测定的土壤中锌的毒性阈值、主控因子及预测模型研究. 生态毒理学报, 2012, 7(6): 657-663 [25] NEPC (National Environment Protection Council). National Environment Protection (Assessment of site contamination) Measure 1999: Schedule B5a, Guideline on Ecological risk assessment (F2013L00768). Canberra: NEPC, Australia, 2013 [26] UKEA (UK Environment Agency). An ecological risk assessment framework for contamination in soil (SC07009/SR1). Bristol, UK: UKEA, 2008 |