模拟酸雨胁迫对杨梅幼苗水分生理特性的影响

应用生态学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (08): 1967-1974.

模拟酸雨胁迫对杨梅幼苗水分生理特性的影响

姚兆斌1,2,江洪1,2,3**,余树全1,2,鲁美娟1,2

1亚热带森林培育国家重点实验室/浙江省森林生态系统碳循环与固碳减排重点实验室,杭州 311300；2浙江农林大学, 杭州311300;3南京大学国际地球系统科学研究所, 南京 210093

出版日期:2011-08-18 发布日期:2011-08-18

Effects of simulated acid rain on water physiological characteristics of Myrica rubra seedlings.

YAO Zhao-bin1,2, JIANG Hong1,2,3, YU Shu-quan1,2, LU Mei-juan1,2

1State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Forest Science & Zhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Carbon Cycling in Forest Ecosystems and Carbon Sequestration, Hangzhou 311300, China;2Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, Hangzhou 311300, China; 3International Institute for Earth System Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China

Online:2011-08-18 Published:2011-08-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 选择浙江省典型亚热带经济植物杨梅为对象,通过盆栽试验研究了重度酸雨(pH 2.5)、中度酸雨(pH 4.0)和对照(pH 5.6)处理对杨梅幼苗水分生理特性的影响.结果表明: 季节、年份和酸雨对杨梅幼苗的光合速率均有显著影响,各处理中，夏季的差异大于春、秋季,pH 4.0处理对光合速率有促进作用；季节、年份、酸雨, 季节-年份交互作用以及三者交互作用对气孔导度均有显著影响,各处理在夏季的差异大于春、秋季,酸雨对气孔导度有抑制作用；季节、年份、酸雨及季节-年份和季节-酸雨两两交互作用对蒸腾速率有显著影响,各处理夏季的差异大于春秋季,且pH 2.5处理对蒸腾速率的抑制作用最强；酸雨、季节-年份和季节-酸雨交互作用对水分利用率有显著影响,且pH 2.5处理对水分利用率有一定的促进作用
.

关键词: 模拟酸雨, 杨梅, 幼苗, 水分生理

Abstract: Taking the seedlings of typical subtropical economic tree species Myrica rubra in Zhejiang Province as test materials, a pot experiment was conducted to study their water physiological characteristics under effects of simulated acid rain (pH 2.5 and pH 4.0), with water (pH 5.6) as the control. Season, year, and acid rain all had significant effects on the photosynthetic rate (P_n). Among the treatments, the P_n had a greater difference in summer than in spring and autumn, and was higher in treatment acid rain (pH 4.0). Season, year, acid rain, and the interactions of season and year and of the three factors had significant effects on the stomata conductance (G_s), and also, the G_s had a greater difference among the treatments in summer than in spring and autumn. Acid rain had inhibitory effect on G_s. Season, year, acid rain, and the interactions of season and year and of season and acid rain affected the transpiration rate (T_r) significantly. Same as P_n and G_s, the T_r had a greater difference among the treatments in summer than in spring and autumn. Acid rain (pH 2.5) had the strongest inhibitory effect on T_r. Acid rain and the interactions of season and year and of season and acid rain had significant effects on the water use efficiency (WUE), and acid rain (pH 2.5) had definitely positive effect on the WUE.

Key words: simulated acid rain, Myrica rubra, seedling, water physiology

姚兆斌,江洪,余树全,鲁美娟. 模拟酸雨胁迫对杨梅幼苗水分生理特性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(08): 1967-1974.

[1]	王宁, 师赵康, 徐世英, 尹凤茹, 王伟杰, 冯万军. 低氮诱导玉米幼苗叶片衰老过程中碳氮平衡的动态变化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(4): 1045-1054.
[2]	张晓鹏, 于立忠, 杨晓燕, 黄佳琪, 殷有. 辽东山区天然更新红松幼苗种群结构与动态 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(2): 289-296.
[3]	任海英, 徐巧, 戚行江, 俞浙萍, 郑锡良, 张淑文, 王震铄. 健康与凋萎病杨梅树体及根围菌群的差异 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(9): 3107-3118.
[4]	廖睿燕, 吴小琪, 靳程, 黄力, 钱深华, 杨永川. 林冠环境对润楠幼苗构型和生物量分配的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(6): 2061-2069.
[5]	周光, 徐玮泽, 万静, 汪雁楠, 刘丽婷, 刘琪璟. 长白山阔叶红松林不同演替阶段林下红松幼苗能量与养分季节动态 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(5): 1663-1672.
[6]	曹亚玲, 俞梦笑, 江军, 曹楠楠, 赵梦頔, 王琛, 张德强, 闫俊华. 模拟酸雨对南亚热带典型森林土壤N₂O排放的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(4): 1213-1220.
[7]	马占强, 许雁翀, 凡贞洁, 侯典云, 徐秋月. Cu₂O纳米颗粒对小麦根系形态及遗传毒性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(3): 1105-1111.
[8]	潘慧超, 王俊锋, 敖云娜, 穆春生. 干旱胁迫下华北驼绒藜种子大小及苞片对萌发和幼苗生长的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(2): 399-405.
[9]	王秀青, 王进鑫, 马戌, 张玉玉, 王怀彪, 王玉宝, 狄龙. 紫穗槐叶片浸提液对长柄扁桃种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(1): 57-65.
[10]	刘斌, 陈维, 陈伏生, 唐润钰, 王小东, 程怡晴, 卜文圣. 九连山次生阔叶林幼苗生长对氮磷添加的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(8): 2533-2540.
[11]	李金鑫, 叶俊伟, 刘大会. 巴茅草水浸提液对3种作物种子萌发及幼苗生长的化感作用 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(7): 2219-2226.
[12]	董淑琦, 曹鹏, 胡春艳, Sher Alam, 原向阳, 杨雪芳, 郭平毅. 谷子秸秆不同部位水浸液对3种杂草的化感作用 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(7): 2243-2250.
[13]	杭伟, 戈玉莹, 刘浩宇, 江浩然, 张世航, 陶冶. 羽枝青藓和瘤柄匐灯藓对入侵植物种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(7): 2271-2278.
[14]	牛胤全, 史雨刚, 汤小莎, 晋秀娟, 曹亚萍, 杨进文, 王曙光, 孙黛珍. 高CO₂浓度、干旱及其互作对不同持绿型小麦幼苗的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(7): 2407-2414.
[15]	徐浩成, 郑路, 王宏翔, 农友, 陈永康, 李萌, 蔡道雄, 尤业明. 南亚热带红锥大径材培育林幼苗更新及其与母树的空间关联性 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(4): 1055-1062.