放牧对亚热带人工草地牧草构型及小格局的影响

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对休牧后的亚热带人工草地及长期禁牧草地牧草种群的构型及小格局的研究结果表明,随着放牧强度的增加,鸭茅、红三叶株丛宽度逐渐变小.在对照及6只羊·hm^-2、75只羊·hm^-2、10只羊·hm^-2轮牧草地上,鸭茅基径的峰值分别介于6～8cm、2～4cm、0～2cm和0～2cm之间;红三叶则介于1～1.2cm、6～8cm、4～6cm和2～4cm之间;鸭茅丛密度分别为60、95.1、210.2和160丛·m^-2;单丛蘗数量分别为11.9、11.2、7.3、6.9蘗/丛.与禁牧草地相比,放牧草地鸭茅单丛蘖的数量明显减少,而丛密度则明显增加.白三叶节间长度因放牧强度增加而明显下降,为1.51～2.04cm,分枝角度则逐渐变大,介于46.5～77.3°.鸭茅、白三叶及红三叶在小格局水平上其格局规模均以1个样方(2cm×2cm)为主,并且随着放牧强度的提高,鸭茅、红三叶小格局规模进一步变小.白三叶构型及小格局的变化提高了牧草对环境资源的利用率.

关键词: 人工草地, 牧草, 构型, 小格局

Abstract: This study was conducted on a 5-year artificial grassland in subtropical zone of South China.The main types of established artificial grassland there were Dactylis glomerata-Lolium prenne-Trifolium repens and D.glomerata-T.repens pastures. Four grazing intensities were designed,i.e.,CK(no grazing),G₁ (6 adult sheep·hm^-2), G₂(7.5 adult sheep·hm^-2) and G₃ (10 adult sheep·hm^-2),and all the grazing plots were rotationally grazed. The architecture and small-scale pattern of grasses on the grazed and ungrazed grassland were discussed. After a period of 5-year grazing, the plant basal width and sward height of D. glomerata and T. pratense decreased gradually. In treatments CK,G₁,G₂ and G₃,the basal width of D. glomerata was 6～8,2～4,0～2 and 0～2 cm, and that of T. pratense was 1～1.2, 6～8, 4～6 and 2～4 cm, respectively. The tuft density of D. glomerata in treatments CK, G₁, G₂ and G₃ was 60, 95.1, 210.2 and 160 tufts·m^-2, respectively. The tiller number per plant of D. glomerata decreased, while its tuft density increased significantly due to the increased grazing intensity. With the increase of grazing intensity, the internode length of T. repens decreased, while its branching angle increased. The average internode length in treatments CK, G₁, G₂ and G₃ was 2.04, 1.69, 1.64 and 1.51 cm, while the branching angle was 46.5, 65, 73 and 77.3°, respectively. The average leaf density of T. repens in treatments CK, G₁, G₂ and G₃ was 2.9, 13.0, 4.7 and 1.0·m^-2, while the relevant stolon density was 19.9, 101, 142 and 82.6 m·m^-2, respectively. Under moderate grazing intensity, both the leaf and stolon densities of T. repens increased. The main scale on small pattern of D. glomerata, T. repens and T. pratense was 2 cm×2 cm, which was further decreased under higher grazing intensity in the treatments of D. glomerata and T. pratense. Considering the heterogeneity of environmental resources, the change of the architecture and small-scale pattern could be regarded as an adaptation of grasses under grazing disturbance.

Key words: Artificial grassland, Grass, Architecture, Small-scale pattern

中图分类号:

Q142
S812

包国章, 康春莉, 郭平. 放牧对亚热带人工草地牧草构型及小格局的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2004, (12): 2267-2271.

BAO Guozhang, KANG Chunli, GUO Ping. Effects of grazing on architecture and small-scale pattern of grasses on artificial grassland in subtropical zone[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2004, (12): 2267-2271.

参考文献

[1] Adler PB. 2001. The effect of grazing on the spatial heterogeneity of vegetation. Oecologia, 128:465～479
[2] Aguiar MR, Sala OE. 1999. Patch structure, dynamics, and implications for the functioning of arid ecosystems. Trees, 14:273～277
[3] Archer M. 1978. Further studies on palatability of grasses to horses. J British Grassl Soc,33:239～243
[4] Bazzaz FA. 1996. Plants in Changing Environments. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
[5] Bircham, JS, Hodgson J. 1984. The effects of change in herbage mass on rates of herbage growth and senescence in mixed swards.Grass Forage Sci,39:111～115
[6] Carlson GE. 1966. Growth of clover leaves-developmental morphology and parameters at ten stages. Crop Sci, 6: 293～294
[7] Case TJ and Sidell R. 1983. Pattern and chance in the structure of model and natural communities. Evolution, 37: 832～849
[8] Clapharn WM, Elbert-May D. 1989. Influence of population on white lupin morphology and yield. Can J Plant Sci, 69:161～170
[9] Coughenour MB. 1991. Spatial components of plant-herbivore interactions in pastoral, ranching, and native ungulate ecosystems. J Range Manage, 44: 530～542
[10] Dong M(董鸣). 1996. Clonal growth in plants in relation to resource heterogeneity: Foraging behavior. Acta Bot Sin ( 植物学报), 38 (10): 828～835 ( in Chinese)
[11] Evans JP, Cain ML. 1995. A spatially explicit test of foraging behaviour in a clonal plant. Ecology, 76:1147～1155
[12] Harper JL. 1977. Population Biology of Plants. London and New York: Academic Press. 24～30
[13] Hutchings MJ, de Kroon H. 1994. Foraging in plants: The role of morphological plasticity in resource acquisition. Adv Ecol Res, 25:159～238
[14] Kelly CK. 1990. Plant foraging:A marginal value model and coiling response in Cuscuta subinclusa. Ecology, 71:1916～1925
[15] Langer R, Ryle SM, Jewiss OR. 1964. The changing plant and tiller populations of timothy and meadow fescue swards I. Plant survival and the pattern of tillering. J Appl Ecol, 1:197～208
[16] Li H(李红), Yang Y-F(杨允菲), Qiao X-B(乔喜波).2000.Age structure of tillers of Hordeum brevisulatum clone in Songnen plain of China. Chin J Appl Ecol ( 应用生态学报 ), 11 ( 3 ): 403～407(in Chinese)
[17] Ma W-L ( 马万里 ), Zhong Z-C ( 钟章成 ). 1998. Morphological adaptability of clonal herb Iris japonica to changed light condition.Chin J Appl Ecol(应用生态学报),9(1) :23～26(in Chinese)
[18] Munier-Jolain NM, et al. 1996. Analysis of branching in springsown white Lupins ( Lupinus albus L. ): The significance of the number of axillary buds. Ann Bot, 77:123～131
[19] Newton P, Hay M. 1996. Clonal growth of white clover: Factors influencing the viability of axillary buds and the outgrowth of a viable bud to form a branch. Ann Bot,78:111～115
[20] Owen DF, Wiegert RG. 1976. Do consumers maximize plant fitness?Oikos, 27:488～492
[21] Owen DF. 1980. How plants may benefit from the animals that eat them. Oikos, 35: 230～235
[22] Pitelka LF. 1977. Energy allocation in annual and perennial Lupines ( Lupinus: Leguminosae). Ecology, 58:1055～1065
[23] Rakocevic M, et al. 2000. Assessing the geometric structure of a white clover ( Trifolium repens L. ) canopy using 3-D digitizing.Ann Bot, 86: 519～526
[24] Silvertown J, Gordon GM. 1989. A framework for plant behaviour.Ann Rev Ecol Syst, 20: 349～366
[25] Stevens RD, Willig MR. 2000. Community structure, abundance,and morphology. Oikos, 88: 48～56
[26] Stowe LG, Wade MJ. 1979. The detection of small-scale pattern in vegetation. J Ecol, 67:1047～1064
[27] Trewavas A. 2002. Plant intelligence: Mindless mastery. Nature,415:841
[28] Xia J-X(夏景新). 1993. Grazing ecology and its application in pasture management. Grassl China (中国草地), (4): 64～70(in Chinese)
[29] Yang C(杨持), Yang L(杨理). 1998. Plasticity of clonal modules of Leymus chinensis in response to different environments. Chin J App Ecol(应用生态学报), 9(3) :265～268(in Chinese)
[30] Zhang J-T(张金屯). 1994.The small-scale pattern for main plant species population in grassland communities. Acta Pratac Sin (草业学报), 3(4) :7～11(in Chinese)
[31] Zhong Z-C(钟章成). 1995. Reproductive strategies of plant populations. Chin J Ecol(生态学杂志), 14(1) :37～42(in Chinese)
[32] Zhu Z-H(朱志红),Wang G(王刚),Zhan S-L(赵松岭).1994.Dynamics and regulation of clonal ramet population in Komresia humilis under different stocking intensities. Acta Ecol Sin ( 生态学报), 14(1) :40～45(in Chinese)